Harry Potter is more important than the entirety of the trans-gender+ community.
>Unlike Rowling, my fantasy series is queer & communist
Wow, I can't believe Rowling didn't include monologues about planned economy and they/them tranny sex in her book series for 9-12-year-olds. It's almost like her target audience was children and not the much smaller audience insane adult troons.
>Unlike Sanderson, my series embraces mystery & ambiguity instead of sounding like a game wiki.
This is just another way of saying it's going to be pretentious tranny nonsense.
>Unlike Tolkien, my series is predicated on real, gritty diversity.
It's a weird flex to say that you thought of including wheelchair-bound black trans women sex workers in your book, therefore you are a better author than a man who wrote his books during the first half of the 20th century when the concept of wheelchair-bound black trans women sex workers hadn't even been invented. Not that it matters, because no serious book should feature wheelchair-bound black trans women sex workers.
Also, you are not Tolkien.
>Unlike Martin, my series has a plan & an ending you won't hate.
Only if all the characters kill themselves at the end.
