Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
ManInTheBlarms said:
Do the actors go out of their way to talk about her? The first statements were sort of a big response to Rowling being a constant source of controversy from then on and I'm pretty sure they just reply when interviewers ask nowadays.

Tell me, if Rowling had instead dedicated the last 5 years to causing a violent white genocide, what response would you want from the actors? Should they just be quiet when asked and grateful that they got to be movie stars?
Click to expand...
So this is off topic and I give my apologies but..

Do you really equate not letting fat fetish fueled retarded faggots in bathrooms, changing rooms, prisons, and destroying sports with/for women and children on the same level as a genocide of about 60% of the country..? That’s.. a choice.

Anyways. JK has always been a really wonderful writer, and she’s been really good at getting down to brass tacks, as eloquently as possible without resorting to purple prose or talking down to people. Even if I didn’t agree with her, the way she makes far leftists and trannies absolutely seethe (see the quoted comment tbh) will always be respected. The fact like 70% of the trannies have multiple potter tatts makes it about 200% funnier.
 
Sneedmason said:
Cope.

The ball was in the woman's court here, the men only got power because the woman accepted it. A simple "no", and you wouldn't have this problem. They had the leverage at the moment and fucked it up.
Click to expand...
My post was about women who say yes because they want the whore job. And how you are angry that they wanted the whore job from that guy and not you. None of my post was about the ones who did not want to use the sex money.
Sexual Chocolate said:
Daniel Radcliffe
Click to expand...
He's normal-looking for an English or American mid-30s non-athlete. You'd be shocked to see the difference between 25 and 32 in men who were high levels of attractive at 25. Guys who are normal but good at fashion still destroy their own faces by 32-ish with never learning to drink water. Radcliffe's a perfectly acceptable 35 year old male (by he standards of heterosexual 35 year old women). He looks like all the married younger guys I see at instagram brunch restaurants. Shorter than northern and western Euros his age, but not enough that it would bother women that age. Remember that not fat, not bald, bathes, and wears pants that fit are an instant 7 for a straight male.
 
Tri-Tachyon'sClown said:
Did...did you misspell it twice?
Click to expand...
2 different misspellings. Some men just want to watch the world burn.
CECA Loather said:
I am torn. I am not sure if I prefer what Rowling wrote excoriating Emma girl or something more concise like the Ralphism, "I made you, bieeeeccchhh!"
Click to expand...
Real shit, I have never seen the Harry Potter movies and I can only tell you that I know Emma Stone from Harry Potter and that's it. I can't name one other movie she's ever been in.
Even the girl and guy from Twilight I could tell you other movies they were in.
 
Boingboingboingboi said:
this is completely wrong and i have no idea why people are thoughtlessly agreeing. "change of tact" is not a set phrase. it's a mistaken, ungrammatical bastardization of "change of tack", which is the correct, common set phrase and indeed has nautical, metaphorical origins. "change of tack" is a nice turn of phrase but it's utterly unremarkable. nobody says "change of tact" to refer to a "change of tactics" unless they're dumb. they would just say "change of tactics" or "tactical change". "tact" means "skill or sensitivity in dealing with others".
Click to expand...
irregardless pooch could care less toward comprised of
that is to say, "marry me".
 
teriyakiburns said:
She's said essentially nothing about immigration for the past year. Her most recent posts were of the same calibre as those she was making about transgenders, right before her open letter got her cancelled, while most of her public stance on things like islam is profoundly negative. Whether she supports or opposes mass immigration, she's staying quiet about it and remaining focused on defeating the troon menace.
Click to expand...
Lol. Lmao.
joanne_migration.webp
 
The greater a'tuin said:
Lol. Lmao.
View attachment 7979600
Click to expand...
If she said too much about the migrants in the UK there’s a genuine chance she could get arrested. I understand why she’s playing it safe if she is against the shit.

If she does still support it then I don’t really care, as far as I know she hasn’t said anything worse than the average lukewarm liberal take. I think she’s avoiding talking about stuff unrelated to trannies excessively to avoid alienating her supporters.
 
Dr. Butt said:
He's normal-looking for an English or American mid-30s non-athlete. You'd be shocked to see the difference between 25 and 32 in men who were high levels of attractive at 25. Guys who are normal but good at fashion still destroy their own faces by 32-ish with never learning to drink water. Radcliffe's a perfectly acceptable 35 year old male (by he standards of heterosexual 35 year old women). He looks like all the married younger guys I see at instagram brunch restaurants. Shorter than northern and western Euros his age, but not enough that it would bother women that age. Remember that not fat, not bald, bathes, and wears pants that fit are an instant 7 for a straight male.
Click to expand...
You look like Daniel Radcliffe, don't you?
 
Last edited:
Dan of Steel said:
How is what JKR says causing a transsexual genocide? If I'm being honest from what I've seen by JKR even though I'm endeared to what she says, she is a bit Twitterbrained but definitely doesn't have the worst or most chronic case of social media addiction. She gives her takes, and being a woman with children she has real stakes and a vested interest and concern for the future of women. So because she shitposts about something that the woman emotionally cares about she's now the cause for troons to kill xirselves? Get real dude.
Trannies were killing themselves before JKR started speaking out against their cult-like ideology. Because, by and large, they're mentally ill lunatics. It's a total false equivalency to say that anything she's posted is the one and the same as a violnt call to arms for a racial group to be murdered or supporting any kind of violence against them. But I suspect you've got an axe to grind at JKR and just want to seethe at her impotently, for whatever reason. Did you get a Harry Potter book dropped on your head as a kid? (They are pretty heavy) Quit embarrassing yourself.
Click to expand...
This is what bugs me the most about Rowling Derangement syndrome. They act like Rowling is some kind of revered expert on tranny issues and a lot of people listen to her her for pointers on policy. That idea is absolutely absurd, but perhaps not nearly as absurd as saying men can be women so they already are in that ballpark of mental gymnastics. When I hear people whining about Rowling and I instantly know they're retarded.
 
and I must scream said:
If I remember correctly, she did said something pro-trans at first
Click to expand...
Evanna sympathized with trannies, and the reason she gave was that she understands not being comfortable in their own body since she was anorexic.
She also stated that Ms. Rowling helped her with her anorexia and people should give Ms. Rowling more grace. That's when trannies turned on her.
 
CECA Loather said:
I am torn. I am not sure if I prefer what Rowling wrote excoriating Emma girl or something more concise like the Ralphism, "I made you, bieeeeccchhh!"
Click to expand...
The eloquence of describing the sublime has no definitive correct length. Both the lengthy and the brief are artistically valid and beautiful in their own merit, for they equally convey the meaning of pimp slapping a conceited bitch verbally.
 
The only thing I disagree with in JKR's statement is that, no, those kids DO owe her something. They owe her the gratitude of having adult guidance in the entertainment industry that genuinely cared for their wellbeing. The way that child actors are treated is fucking disgusting, and having someone they could rely on that they knew wouldn't pass them around Schneider-style is something that so many of these poor former starlets probably wish they had every single day.

Emma got to experience being a star in one of most influential media franchises in the world and got out of it without the shit that's made every single Nickelodeon kid tear themselves apart over the decade since.

She might not owe Joanne her career, but she sure as fuck owes her her innocence.
 
Squid Bitch said:
People here keep sperging about this, but, much like the hysterical trannies who screech about JK Rowling salivating at the thought of TTD and genocide, they never back it up with quotes of her saying anything to that effect.

In fact, as has already been pointed out, she actually has spoken up ( a ) about the Rotherham rape gangs, and regularly tweets about the plight of women living under the Taliban/Iranian rule/etc. (i.e., Islamist regimes).

Maybe I'm wrong, and if I am I'll be happy to call myself a retarded faggot. But until someone actually provides evidence of her being OK with rape gangs and radical Muslims etc., the retards are the ones making those baseless claims.
Click to expand...
This is about 60-70% true, she did advocate for taking refugees by the thousand but that seems to have been almost entirely on Twitter in 2015 and mostly a reaction to prominent depictions of dead children on magazine covers. What I most remembered, and what I expect a fair few do, is that petition that went around saying she should let refugees stay in her 18 empty bedrooms. But that came with people saying "She said anyone in the UK with a spare room should let a refugee stay in it" which was either memory holed or, more likely, was bullshit that she never said and was just an after the fact rationalization for the petition that stuck with people and their perception of her. But she railed hard against both Brexit and anyone critical of mass migration on twitter.
A lot of what was reported can be easily interpreted as an understandable expression of empathy, but the backlash points out that she is likely only as willing to extend this empathy as she is because, as a multi-millionaire media mogul, she will never be impacted by the lives of the working class that most of these migrants would likely slate into as their culture won't determine policy until the next generation is of voting age.
I don't think anyone is saying she literally, directly acted as any kind of apologist for rape gangs or radical Islamists. They're saying she's shortsighted for advocating for them to be brought in by the thousands because they're dying trying to leave. Lots of the normal people dying to get here are still coming from the most conservative nations on the planet to the most liberal, and that's obviously going to create problems.
That's cool that she said something. Only this year, but still. Talking about the suffering of women in Islamist countries while suggesting we should set a precedent to annually transplant the culturally entrenched Islamists who make those countries what they are is asinine. But she might be on the way to finding a way to actually criticize this effectively.
 
Lip Glossary said:
She just gave Emma Watson the verbal equivalent of the "call an ambulance but not for me" meme.
Also I want to know what kind of witchcraft JK used on Emma to age her horribly.
View attachment 7979343
I mean damn... She's early 30s in this picture. JK hit her with some magic that made her age like a trucker.
Click to expand...
What drugs do to an actress ig.

Flopper said:
Emma Watson stopped being relevant after the main Harry Potter films ended. From what little I've seen of her, she's pretty ignorant of anything outside of Hollywood.
Click to expand...
I wonder why would JK Rowling ever choose her for the role? Hermione was a buck toothed greasy and messy haired weirdo who had to make up her lack of a lot of things with smarts. Emma Watson clearly is not this.

I can see Daniel Radcliffe as harry even if his eyes are blue and Ruppert as Ron even if ron had shorter hair in the books. But Emma genuinely does not look like Hermione, even if we ignore the retcon of Hermione suddenly being black.

The funniest thing is that out of all the movies, you can give credit to the 6th movie, as bad as it is, that it tried to make Emma Watson to look like Hermione in the book as many of her scenes had her hair really messy. The rest didn't even try.
 
Last edited:
bouquetnine said:
This is what bugs me the most about Rowling Derangement syndrome. They act like Rowling is some kind of revered expert on tranny issues and a lot of people listen to her her for pointers on policy. That idea is absolutely absurd, but perhaps not nearly as absurd as saying men can be women so they already are in that ballpark of mental gymnastics. When I hear people whining about Rowling and I instantly know they're retarded.
Click to expand...
Leftists do not understand the idea of forming your opinions yourselves based on facts/data. They have very little to no theory of mind, thus they are heavily projecting. They listen to the electric jew and get all their opinions from it, therefore they believe that if you disagree with their cult, it's because you're in another one, you have some secret NS source telling you to dislike trannies, and if that source can just be shut down, then you will immediately join the leftist cult again. It's why they're so adamant on destroying JKR, Trump, Tate, Kirk... because they believe those are NS factories and we could all achieve gay space communism if only "every evil influencer" was silenced. They cannot fathom that we hate their death-cult independently of what any personality says, that our opinions and knowledge are truly our own, that we think things based on rationality and facts, not narratives.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom