- Joined
- Jun 5, 2024
Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"
- Thread starter 1440p Curved Monitor
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2022
Louie_The_Dago / Louie The Dago / 2BitterFucks / Fartzman / The Weird Turn Professional / Louis Caponecchia / Louis A Caponecchia / Louis Anthony Caponecchia
DOB: June 1st 1981, 43 year old from Clinton Township, Michigan, (suburb of Detroit). Graduated from Mt. Clemens High School in 1999. He's gotten into it with several politicians over the years.
Louis showing off his karate moves
From his old channel, He does this weird sailor dance in his undies
In one video, He and his buddy joke about animal abuse by pointing a gun and wielding a hammer at their dog. Though no animal was hurt as a result, It ain't the kind of thing worth joking about.
Twitter, A
Youtube, A
Old Youtube, A
Classmates, A
Blog he made about Brian Kolfage, A, theweirdturnprofessional
Kolfage vs Caponecchia, A, He was sued by Brian Kolfage in 2014 for libel and slander.
Reddit thread he joins to talk about Brian Kolfage in
Email:
louiscaponecchia@hotmail.com
Registered to
21451 N Nunneley Rd, Clinton Township, MI 48036
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2020
I'm pretty sure Rowling could make this "writer" grovel and beg for mercy as calling someone a nonce (especially when unsubstantiated) is considered unlawful in the UK.
Last edited:
Hodgdon H4350
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2024
Your math's a bit off there, he'd be 43 currently
Gorillion others
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2023
I think I just threw up something in my mouth.
Kyria the Great
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2017
Well women have a right to not have their spaces infested with dysgenic, sex crazed weirdos. I'm so glad that the UK will show they aren't real women.
Trannies almost always without fail are also massive misogynists
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2021
I just wish trannies had a sense of humor. They take everything way to seriously.
Oh god damn it he's a lefty to?! There has to be someone in entertainment who hasn't taken the fucking blue pill.
Kyria the Great
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2017
Well AGPs are the joke of society so I guess there's that
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
It's dumb how I ended up with so many, they are getting cut down don't worry. I'd probably get the other books of hers second hand anyway.
I'll check to make sure the libraries here all have copies, good idea!
They don't want anyone else to be "exposed" to JKR. They should just throw it away, the cowards. My comrade tried to sell her stuff, but I don't even think she went through with it.
Candidate No 7
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2023
A totally insane thread on Bluesky calling for a boycott of all things HP descends into the usual delirious allegations about how efil the whole saga was in the first place.
This cracked me up:
(I'm not going to look for that ten hours long video - I'm not that committed to the milking! Good lord.)
This cracked me up:
(I'm not going to look for that ten hours long video - I'm not that committed to the milking! Good lord.)
Gorillion others
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2023
It's genuinely tiring.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
Because that's always succesful. Absolutely no one bought Hogwarts legacy.
Trannies seriously overestimate their importance. It's a giant narc cult.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2020
I think I recognize the thumbnail, I had this video recommended to me too.
Yep I found it
If I recall correctly I was idly listening to it a few years ago until I noticed the video was essentially nitpicking every single detail to make either the characters or JK out to be terrible people.
One such example I vividly remember is this guy saying that Harry is a terrible person because he is rich and doesn't give the Weasleys, a poor family, any money or shows them any generosity.
Despite the fact that he HAS offered them money numerous times and that they refused it every time for one reason or another either stated or implied.
And even the one time where he literally forced money into the hands of Fred and George Weasley it is construed and presented in such a way that Harry didn't want anything to do with this money.
The money in question was the prize from winning the Tri-Wizard Tournament, in the conclusion of the tournament Harry essentially tied with another boy for the win but in the process of grabbing the cup they were teleported away and the boy was murdered and Voldemort was resurrected.
The video construes Harry giving this specific money away to Fred and George as essentially pawning off blood or cursed money to them just so he, Harry, doesn't have to have it.
Another example the video goes into to my recollection is that Harry is sometimes freeloading with the Weasleys during summer...meaning he sleeps in their house, gets fed breakfast and gets to lounge around for free despite the Weasleys being poor and Harry being rich.
This again ignores the fact that Harry is AN ORPHANED BOY and that he actively does chores just like the other Weasley children.
The entire video is like this, always interpreting every line and every action a character takes in the most uncharitable of lights.
It would be comical if it didn't make me so angry, which is why I am not rewatching it, i'll leave that to someone else.
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2016
It's been awhile since I read the books, but I was under the impression Harry couldn't access his fortune until he became an adult? It's not like he carried sacks of wizard gold under his cape every day.
But I do remember that Harry gave his tainted winnings to Fred and George specifically so they could open their dream joke shop. He basically told them "the world is about to go tits up so we're going to need whatever whimsy we can get." Seems pretty based for a rich kid.
But I do remember that Harry gave his tainted winnings to Fred and George specifically so they could open their dream joke shop. He basically told them "the world is about to go tits up so we're going to need whatever whimsy we can get." Seems pretty based for a rich kid.
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2022
Headline on the frontpage of the Daily Mail right now. They have pictures of the placards, of course. Keep going lads, there's still so many people left to be peaked! 1400 comments so far.
I'm glad Rowling has enough money to pay for good security though. Lotta psychos out and about right now.
I'm glad Rowling has enough money to pay for good security though. Lotta psychos out and about right now.
Archive.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2020
I don't recall any such plotpoint, no.
In the first book Hagrid takes him to his fortune with the goblins, he literally takes money from it and buys his school supplies with it, nothing really implies he has no access to it.
By book 3 he even goes to Hogsmeade and buys Butterbeer and other stuff there, I would say he does keep money on him.
This is also true, it's just this whole him wanting to to get rid of the winnings only because it was tainted is the narrative the video was pushing.
It's obviously false, in my eyes it struck me more as a "I have this fucking money in my hands right now and you will take it because you have your shop to open, no buts!" kind of situation.
Kyria the Great
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2017
Also Harry gave Fred and George the money because it recooperated their money and then some from Ludo Bagman (a character I wish would have been in the films) stiffed them in a sports bet at the Quidditch tournament. I wish people were more honest about their criticism of Rowling and HP rather than this sour grapes method they take.
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
I have a headcannon that Dumblebumble was unofficially aware of how much money he was using and would’ve given him a warning if he was spending it like water. Dumbledore’s omniscience cures everything.
hind matches ltd
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2024
It's consistently the Weasleys who refuse money from Harry, while Harry takes every opportunity and half-chance he has to get them gifts and stuff they want (the money from the prize is one example, but he also repeatedly buys Ron sweets under the guise of either buying too much for himself or simply buying sweets for all of his friends. He gifts Lockhart's very expensive books to the Weasleys in Chamber of Secrets when Lockhart gifts them to him. In that same Quidditch tournament the thread mentioned, Harry buys Ron an expensive souvenir the Weasleys wouldn't have been able to afford. He claims it's a "birthday and Christmas" gift, if I remember correctly, and later, when Ron pays him back with gold he didn't realize at the time was fake, Harry doesn't say anything about it. It's Ron who has to point it out after he finds out, and he asks why Harry didn't tell him).
The point of this situation, I think, is that the Weasleys aren't friends with Harry because of his money or fame, unlike what many "Weasley bashing" fics say. Molly and Arthur respect Harry's money, and understand that he's a child. They're not going to accept him using his dead parents' inheritance on them. They may not be able to afford new books, pets and robes, but they're not starving. Their attitude also contrasts with Draco's and his Slytherin buddies: Draco throws money around, gets into the Quidditch team because Lucius bought everyone new brooms, etc.
This is all very common in literature aimed at children: be humble, be generous, you don't need the newest toy (Harry even realizes on his own, when he's set loose on Diagon Alley with money and no supervision, that he doesn't need to buy the newest, fanciest broom when he already owns a perfectly good one), be careful with your money, don't pick your friends based on what they can do/buy for you, etc.
At this point, I genuinely can't tell whether those kind of videos are bad faith interpretations made by people who haven't read the books in at least a decade or just made by godawful people who wouldn't recognize selflessness and kindness if it bit them in the ass.
The point of this situation, I think, is that the Weasleys aren't friends with Harry because of his money or fame, unlike what many "Weasley bashing" fics say. Molly and Arthur respect Harry's money, and understand that he's a child. They're not going to accept him using his dead parents' inheritance on them. They may not be able to afford new books, pets and robes, but they're not starving. Their attitude also contrasts with Draco's and his Slytherin buddies: Draco throws money around, gets into the Quidditch team because Lucius bought everyone new brooms, etc.
This is all very common in literature aimed at children: be humble, be generous, you don't need the newest toy (Harry even realizes on his own, when he's set loose on Diagon Alley with money and no supervision, that he doesn't need to buy the newest, fanciest broom when he already owns a perfectly good one), be careful with your money, don't pick your friends based on what they can do/buy for you, etc.
At this point, I genuinely can't tell whether those kind of videos are bad faith interpretations made by people who haven't read the books in at least a decade or just made by godawful people who wouldn't recognize selflessness and kindness if it bit them in the ass.
Last edited: