Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
They know they'd never be able to make someone like Matt Walsh bend the knee, but they've been successful bullying just about every other woman except this one.
Thank the Good Lord above for "fuck you" money. 🙏

Edit: typos
They have no interest in making someone like Matt Walsh bend the knee, but JKR is exactly the kind of person from whom they expect and demand obedience.
 
View attachment 5066592
Screen shot is shitty but here ya go.

You know a lot of this rage can be boiled down to the fact that they can't control her and that drives them insane.

They know they'd never be able to make someone like Matt Walsh bend the knee, but they've been successful bullying just about every other woman except this one.
Thank the Good Lord above for "fuck you" money. 🙏

Edit: typos
ITS CAPITALISM THAY ALLOWS HER TO DO THIS WE MEED COMMUNISM. So then it wouldn't have allowed the few years you liked it to be possible...pick one lol
 
A popular (1.66M subs) leftist trans youtuber ContraPoints (who has a thread) posted a two-hour-long video comparing JKR to Anita Bryant, discussing the efficacy of debate as an activist tactic, and arguing that the anti-trans movement that was started by lesbian trans-exclusionary feminists has inevitably become a right-wing one.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=EmT0i0xG6zg
The video begins with talking about Anita Bryant, an anti-gay activist of the 1970s who lost her career. It then talks about a podcast ContraPoints was interviewed for, The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling, hosted by Megan Phelps-Roper, a former Westboro Baptist Church member.

ContraPoints discusses whether JKR is transphobic and concludes that those who think she is not do not believe transphobia exists at all because they do not believe transgenders exist, not in the capacity transgenders themselves assert they are.

After that, ContraPoints discusses the efficacy of debate as an activist tactic, concludes that it is scarcely useful, discusses how activist movements have historically achieved their goals by being threatening and disruptive, and points out how anti-trans movement likewise employs violent rhetoric on social media.

The video ends with speculations on what drives women to participate in the anti-trans movement, especially as ContraPoints sees it as having evolved from one started by trans-exclusionary lesbian feminists into a right-wing one; comparisons of Posie Parker to Phyllis Schlafly and ample quoting of Andrea Dworkin included. The conclusion is that anti-trans women displace their anger and resentment at men in their lives onto transgenders.
Oh yeah, didn't ContrAGPoints get cancelled by other troons a few years ago for not being woke enough?
 
A popular (1.66M subs) leftist trans youtuber ContraPoints (who has a thread) posted a two-hour-long video comparing JKR to Anita Bryant, discussing the efficacy of debate as an activist tactic, and arguing that the anti-trans movement that was started by lesbian trans-exclusionary feminists has inevitably become a right-wing one.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=EmT0i0xG6zg

This entire video reads to me as Contra being assmad that he couldn't take down Rowling despite getting the floor all to himself. There was such a perfect opportunity to do it, and in the end because he is such a lousy debater, he shat the bed badly. So instead of taking the L, and just moving on. Contra once again prove that Tranny Activists are some of the most scummy people in the planet by not only being intellectually dishonest, but also trying to shift the narrative once more on his favor.

Shit like this why many normies have started to turn against these maniacs because they cannot comprehend when the fight is done, and they lost.
 
Oh yeah, didn't ContrAGPoints get cancelled by other troons a few years ago for not being woke enough?
He actually brings this up in the podcast about JKR, And uses that as justification for how he understands what she's going through and that's how he knows that she's wrong and and a transphobe or some bullshit.
 
Johnny Bravo would freak the fuck out of he found out the woman he was hitting on was a man
Ft7uLfeWwAAktWv.jpg
 
After that, ContraPoints discusses the efficacy of debate as an activist tactic, concludes that it is scarcely useful, discusses how activist movements have historically achieved their goals by being threatening and disruptive, and points out how anti-trans movement likewise employs violent rhetoric on social media.

The video ends with speculations on what drives women to participate in the anti-trans movement, especially as ContraPoints sees it as having evolved from one started by trans-exclusionary lesbian feminists into a right-wing one; comparisons of Posie Parker to Phyllis Schlafly and ample quoting of Andrea Dworkin included. The conclusion is that anti-trans women displace their anger and resentment at men in their lives onto transgenders.
They're so completely divorced from reality, that the suggestion that the consequences of that divorce will be less cotton candy and unicorns and more physical violence and sexual assault becomes violent rhetoric. Maybe the push back has less to do with who women want to fuck or their politics and more with the fact that humans cannot change sex. No one has to resent a TIM or be angry at them to see that being men, they should be excluded anywhere sex is segregation makes sense. But first you'd have to think women are fully human rather than bit players in their own lives.
 
You know a lot of this rage can be boiled down to the fact that they can't control her and that drives them insane.
Isn't that the entire point of the trans movement, especially in the case of MtFs who are by far the loudest and most obnoxious of the movement? They bully their way into women-only spaces, scream and froth at the mouth at the slightest inconvenience, pressure women into accepting their reality, and getting violently angry when said women don't bow down to their whims?

Rowling is a symbol of reality and their impotence.

The HP franchise is going to extend into a new TV series and more movies. Even if the showrunners and directors remove every trace of her name from the products, at the end of the day, she still will reap massive royalties. Additionally, even if the movies and show flop, they still will serve as a stark reminder of her presence and forever cement her as living rent-free in their heads.
 
You have to admit that its pretty funny the way that they are trying to adopt the cartoon character where the whole joke is that he's an unsuccessful sex pest as some kind positive role model.
He's really not as much of a sex pest as even Pepe le Pew. He doesn't go all angry incel and start harassing his object of desire when he (almost invariably) gets shot down. He's nowhere near as bad as basically any troon.
 
He's really not as much of a sex pest as even Pepe le Pew. He doesn't go all angry incel and start harassing his object of desire when he (almost invariably) gets shot down. He's nowhere near as bad as basically any troon.
Albeit the show's creators have stated that Bravo gets plenty of girls off-screen, so he's beating any troon and incel by miles.
 
Oh my God I’m just now realizing who this person is.



They’re pretty big on r/lostmedia because they’ve found a whole bunch of lost stuff but among their posts are heaps of stupid shit and awful takes. Take this beauty for example:

View attachment 5064093
Join a community known for mass censoring, deleting/destroying information and is anti-archiving to ... protect archiving?
Very doubleplusgood.
 
Back
Top Bottom