Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Struggle Cakes said:
I hope the SNL writers know everyone else can see this for what it actually is: an extinction burst from the most pants on head retarded idealogy ever seen.

In better news, James McAvoy's insta has been besieged all month by angry Hons impotently throwing their filthy sex toys around and calling him a tranny killer for working with Rowling.

View attachment 8001232

It goes on and on like this. Based Scottish king has weaponized their greatest weakness: ignoring them. No sniveling apologies, no donations to the Trevor project, just pure, silent indifference. Maybe Scotland really is healing.
Click to expand...
"How will you face Elliot page " Lmfao I'm sure he's really scared of the lil guy-ess-ette.
 
Entomologist said:
She does not mind the censorship, the bullying, the harassment, or the egregious abuse of governmental power; she endorses all of those tactics when they are wielded in service of a cause she supports. What she takes issue with is the rubbish idea that humans can change their biological sex.
Click to expand...
Entomologist said:
I’d love to believe that she's come around on censorship in recent times, but I'm not holding my breath.
Click to expand...
If you’re gonna be so autistically hung up on something, provide receipts. Where? When? Rowling’s entire ethos seems to be pretty blatantly anti-censorship in all its forms. It’s a genuine question — what are you talking about? Are you holding on to some random quote from a decade ago? Is this a bad game of telephone?

Also, Rowling is not right-wing nor has she ever pretended to be. So you people sound really retarded when you come around and finger wave and attempt to chastise this woman for not being what you want her to be. Gonna take a shot in the dark and say Rowling is probably a much better and principled person than you are.

It’s always the same profile of some tunnel-vision retard who sees the world in black and white but condescendingly pontificates as if they have something to teach people. Like YOU are the one who doesn’t get the big picture. Please spare us.
 
AnOminous said:
What is it with intense autism and randomly capitalizing words that are not proper nouns?
Click to expand...
They're probably ESL niggers
IMG_7191.jpeg
 
Sasmate said:
They’ve both tarnished their reputations. It was working when it was in their favor but now that the bar has shifted, it’s time to lick their wounds and retire from the public eye for a while, if they know what’s good for them. But they're
Celebrities, so they obviously won’t.
Click to expand...
As much as I admire Rowling for her principled stance on trans abuses, I agree that her beat down on Watson wasn't a good look. Rowling doesn't get superiority points for being poor when young or any other of her personal experiences. She is much older than Watson, and has long past made her "fuck you"money. Rowling was jumping on the race bandwagon a few years ago and commenting about Hermione being black. Given Watson was barely early 20s when jumping on the trans wagon, I think she also gets to make a few mistakes and maybe be more selective about wading into politics. The death threats (unless credible) are noise. Lots of celebrities get them and there is plenty of "kill XX" all over the Farms. Punching down doesn't impress me.
 
Gianfranco Pizzaballa said:
As much as I admire Rowling for her principled stance on trans abuses, I agree that her beat down on Watson wasn't a good look. Rowling doesn't get superiority points for being poor when young or any other of her personal experiences. She is much older than Watson, and has long past made her "fuck you"money. Rowling was jumping on the race bandwagon a few years ago and commenting about Hermione being black. Given Watson was barely early 20s when jumping on the trans wagon, I think she also gets to make a few mistakes and maybe be more selective about wading into politics. The death threats (unless credible) are noise. Lots of celebrities get them and there is plenty of "kill XX" all over the Farms. Punching down doesn't impress me.
Click to expand...
I think she just got sick of Watson constantly bringing her name up and after pointedly not saying anything for years, after a certain amount of times, especially when Watson (who is like 35 now) is posing as this olive branch holding empathetic wise one on a podcast, just decided to have her say.

You can only expect to have someones name in your mouth a certian amount, and not get a reply.
 
AfghanBlue said:
I think she just got sick of Watson constantly bringing her name up and after pointedly not saying anything for years, after a certain amount of times, especially when Watson is posing as this olive branch holding empathetic wise one on a podcast, just decided to have her say.

You can only expect to have soemone name in your mouth a certian amount, and not get a reply.
Click to expand...
You are probably right, but calling Watson names was a real lapse from a normally classy lady.
 
Gianfranco Pizzaballa said:
As much as I admire Rowling for her principled stance on trans abuses, I agree that her beat down on Watson wasn't a good look. Rowling doesn't get superiority points for being poor when young or any other of her personal experiences. She is much older than Watson, and has long past made her "fuck you"money. Rowling was jumping on the race bandwagon a few years ago and commenting about Hermione being black. Given Watson was barely early 20s when jumping on the trans wagon, I think she also gets to make a few mistakes and maybe be more selective about wading into politics. The death threats (unless credible) are noise. Lots of celebrities get them and there is plenty of "kill XX" all over the Farms. Punching down doesn't impress me.
Click to expand...
Watson was 29 the first time she explicitly mentioned trans issues, and again only after (and obviously in reaction to) Rowling's essay. Do people not know how time works, most of this stuff happened post 2018. It has not been that long. Deathly Hallows was 2011 friend, that's when she was "barely" early 20s, Troon time was late 20s early 30s.

T.E.R.F said:
It’s always the same profile of some tunnel-vision retard who sees the world in black and white but condescendingly pontificates as if they have something to teach people. Like YOU are the one who doesn’t get the big picture. Please spare us.
Click to expand...
Yes, its tedious whataboutism. Hell, the very fact that you can't talk about Rowling without her stance of refugees, whatever it may be, coming up, and without some dude crawling out of the woodwork to gargle bile and spit venom about black Hermione is a huge part of the problem. Do you know how hard it is to talk about the problems of mass, unregulated migration with normies when just around the corner there's some dude waiting to just start screaming about irrelevant culture war shit, about how the very presence of a black person in some alt history netflix garbage is an affront to them, no matter how many housewives love to fantasize about the lead faggot? Not everyone who opposes migration wants a triple walled ethnostate as the alternative, and the screeching internet banshees in favor of it don't make getting people to understand the reality of the situation any easier. Especially not when they engage in literally the same extreme cancelling behavior troons and their allies do, that we are laughing at in this thread at this very moment!

Hermione being black in the play literally doesn't matter, it's a fucking play, by the very nature of the art its expected that the characters will shift wildly in visual appearance by production. There are in fact entire productions, including a major broadway hit that I won't bother naming (because I hate it and it sucks, but box office numbers don't lie on whether or not its popular), that are based on basically that premise. Was it an absurd stretch of the truth to say that the book didn't mention Hermione's skin color? Obviously yes, the context and descriptions given to her make it clear that she was not intended as black. But it literally a nothingburger, something that does not fucking matter, and trying to frame it that way would have been way too much fucking effort to counter something so fucking stupid. Its the same way all the troons bitching about x cartoon property being transphobic for making their tomboy character "cis" does not matter. Were any of you frothing at the mouth the time Patrick Stewart played Othello?

This is literally the type of thing that alienates people and pushes them back towards liberal talking points.
 
Mellow Malevolent said:
Watson was 29 the first time she explicitly mentioned trans issues, and again only after (and obviously in reaction to) Rowling's essay. Do people not know how time works, most of this stuff happened post 2018. It has not been that long. Deathly Hallows was 2011 friend, that's when she was "barely" early 20s, Troon time was late 20s early 30s.
Click to expand...
What's with people constantly infantilizing Watson? She was "a child" when she was 19, and "in her early twenties" when she was almost 30. Is it because she's a former child actress so she'll forever be an adorable 11-year-old in most people's heads?

Just because she did and said dumb things doesn't mean she's not a grown adult who knows what she's about. Not every mistake you make in life is because you're young and stupid. Sometimes you're just stupid.
 
That project McAvoy is working with Jo is an audiobook read by many people. They'd have to also cancel Mark Addy and Hugh Laurie. Laurie is playing Voldemort and McAvoy is Moody.
 
When will people finally learn to stop engaging with Rowling on social media, if only to spare themselves the inevitable utter humiliation?

Screenshot 2025-10-05 172028.png

( x ; a ) ( x ; a )
Screenshot 2025-10-05 172109.png

( x ; a ) ( x ; a )

And in response to the synagogue attack in Manchester:
Screenshot 2025-10-05 173459.png

( x ; a ) ( x ; a )
lol
lmfao.jpg
 
Gianfranco Pizzaballa said:
You are probably right, but calling Watson names was a real lapse from a normally classy lady.
Click to expand...
I just reread Rowling's comment on X that caused this thread to (unfortunately) be featured on the KF front page, and I don't see anywhere she called Watson names. Can you show us the actual name calling? The closest I see is "Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is," which is not name-calling, but simply true of many of the rich and famous in general. I've mentioned on other threads that through my work I have had long interactions with a number of famous rock stars. One stayed for a week at a friend's house, and my friend was flabbergasted that the rock star, who had been rich and famous before turning 20, had absolutely no idea how to use a washing machine, and had never used one before. Rowling's statement is not name-calling, but oftentimes true.
 
I don’t understand why people took jk rowling’s statements about Emma Watson’s money as JK Rowling hypocritically fetishing poverty. She spelled out pretty clearly what she was saying: wealthy women like Emma Watson can happily cheer on trans ideology because they will never face the worst excesses of it like poor women trapped in prisons or rape crisis shelters with male sex predators will.
 
Last edited:
Hassou Tobi said:
I don’t understand why people took jk rowling’s statements about Emma Watson’s money as JK Rowling hypocritically fetishing poverty. She spelled out pretty clearly what she was saying: wealthy women like Emma Watson can happily cheer on trans ideology because they will never face the worst excesses of it like poor women trapped in in prisons or rape crisis shelters with male sex predators will.
Click to expand...
They seem to conveniently forget that Rowling is first generation wealthy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom