Culture RIP ThinkProgress: The Top Progressive News Site Has Shut Down - Learn. To. Code.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
.
ThinkProgress, the influential news site that rose to prominence in the shadow of the Bush administration and helped define progressivism during the Obama years, is shutting down.
The outlet, which served as an editorially independent project of the Democratic Party think tank Center for American Progress, will stop current operations on Friday and be converted into a site where CAP scholars can post. Top officials at CAP had been searching for a buyer to take over ThinkProgress, which has run deficits for years, and according to sources there were potentially three serious buyers in the mix recently. But in a statement to staff, Navin Nayak, the executive director of the Center for American Progress Action Fund, said the site was ultimately unable to secure a patron.
“Given that we could find no new publisher, we have no other real option but to fold the ThinkProgress website back into CAP’s broader online presence with a focus on analysis of policy, politics, and news events through the lens of existing CAP and CAP Action staff experts,” said Nayak. “Conversations on how to do so are just beginning, but we will seek to reinvent it as a different platform for progressive change.”
A dozen ThinkProgress employees will be losing their jobs, a CAP aide said, as many who were on staff had already gone to work elsewhere and some were incorporated into the larger CAP infrastructure. Those who are being laid off will be given a severance package that runs through the end of November and health care coverage that lasts through the year, said the CAP aide.
As for the actual website, thinkprogress.org will continue to exist. But it will no longer function as an independent enterprise focused on original reporting. Instead, according to Nayak, it will be folded “back into CAP’s broader online presence” as a sounding board for policy and political analysis by existing CAP and CAP Action staff experts.
“Conversations on how to do so are just beginning,” said Nayak, “but we will seek to reinvent it as a different platform for progressive change.”
Nayak did say that ClimateProgress, which started as an independent blog before merging with ThinkProgress, will be taken over by its founder, Joe Romm.

t its peak, there were few more important pieces of unapologetically progressive, online real estate than ThinkProgress. The site combined original reporting with an attack-dog mentality to target Republican lawmakers and conservative ideas. A testament to its success is found in the list of prominent alumni currently working in politics and journalism. That list includes Faiz Shakir, who now serves as Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign manager; Amanda Terkel, the D.C. bureau chief of the Huffington Post; Nico Pitney, the political director at NowThis; Alex Seitz-Wald, a top campaign reporter for NBC News; Ali Gharib, a senior news editor at The Intercept; and Matt Yglesias, one of the founding members of Vox.
But the site suffered from editorial frictions during the Obama years, when the visions of some of the staff clashed with the larger political demands of CAP and its donors. At one point, CAP’s then-CEO Jen Palmieri wrote a guest post on Yglesias’ ThinkProgress blog to issue a defense of Third Way after Yglesias had criticized the centrist-Democratic group. Elsewhere, there were rifts and tensions over ThinkProgress posts that were critical of Israel.

In the fall of 2015, staffers at ThinkProgress unionized, in part as a means of formalizing editorial independence from CAP brass. And there was a sense that the election of Donald Trump in 2016 would spark a boomlet in material for staff to investigate and cover. In 2018, the site brought on board Jodi Enda, an alum of CNN, to serve as editor in chief, in what was presented as a movement towards more original reporting.
But editorial tensions have lingered. In April, the website posted a story and video about Sanders’ personal wealth which had grown over recent years due to book sales. The presidential candidate responded in a lacerating letter targeting CAP for accepting corporate donations and linking the published story to the bidding of said donors.
In early May, sources told The Daily Beast that the ThinkProgress writers’ union and the author of the story were concerned with the way in which Enda had handled the ordeal, including her making edits without the initial permission of the author. Enda said she publicly and privately apologized for the matter.
Adding to the problems has been a worsening financial situation for the site. Internal documents obtained by The Daily Beast showed ThinkProgress facing a $3-million delta between revenues and expenses in 2019, of which $350,000 had come via a shortfall in ad revenue.

Privately, staffers and some alumni argued that, with some budget reductions, CAP could continue funding operations through the reallocation of donor dollars. ThinkProgress’ staff had ballooned to more than 40 before the number began to dwindle this year. And within these quarters, there has been ample suspicion as to why CAP officials have been so alarmed over the current state of financial distress when the site has lived in this limbo for virtually its entire existence.
But CAP officials said that the long-term outlook for ThinkProgress was dire. A few months ago, they let it be known that they were looking to sell the site off to a prospective buyer.
According to Nayak, CAP had “conversations with more than 20 potential new publishers, including several extended dialogues.” But, he added, “broad trends” in digital news media “proved insurmountable in finding ThinkProgress a new home.


🦀 🦀 🦀 THINK PROGRESS IS DEAD🦀 🦀 🦀
 
Last edited:
Pressing S. I wonder if the clickbait market is oversaturated, or if it's some flaw in the model itself- they all do seem to be tumbling down of late.
 
This is the happiest news since:

McCain dead.png
 
Quite literally never even heard of them. When your sensationalist propaganda machine isn't even noteworthy, you know it's bad.
 
......................


I wont be truly happy until the headmaster, Media Matters, shuts down. Then we can truly celebrate.
 
"I disapprove of what you say, but I would die for your right to say it. But I won't cry if you're too insufferable and stupid to stay in the market, so see ya bitches."
--Voltaire or something I dunno
 
......................


I wont be truly happy until the headmaster, Media Matters, shuts down. Then we can truly celebrate.
I'm really surprised the various powers-that-be are still funding that joke of a think tank. I don't think I've even seen the general MSM take them seriously for a couple years now. You'd think at this point it's lost all whatever influence it once had.
 
Pressing S. I wonder if the clickbait market is oversaturated, or if it's some flaw in the model itself- they all do seem to be tumbling down of late.

ThinkProgress wasn't proper clickbait though, it was just regular old agenda-driven reporting. Angry headlines can be clickbait to the diehard partisans, but it's not a good mass-media strategy.

I think the market is finally processing the ramifications of media publishing in a world without barriers to entry. When there were only 5 TV channels to get your news from, ad revenue could be centralized and support a channel. When there are infinite places a consumer can get their news from, with no switching costs and no brand loyalty, ads are spread too thin to support individual publishers. On top of that, if daily outrage is your reason for consuming news, you can get that for free from Twitter or Facebook. People summarize stories for free on there, no ad-revenue-accruing clickthrough needed.

It's likely we are discovering an economic ceiling for the pool of ad revenue. Marketers have been glorifying hyper-targeted ads for 2 decades now, driven by data collection and affordable data analysis. Niche marketing is all the rage because it's the most effective. But no one stopped to ask, "how many of these niche ads are actually out there, and how many would be profitable enough to keep going?"
 
Who could have though that it wouldn't be profitable to run bugman propaganda straight from the hive through a slight humanizing filter?
 
Think Progress is now officially deader than John McCain?

All I can say is that's not good news for VICE, Buzzfeed, Vox, etc.

Think Progress was definitely agenda-driven, but they were generally far more respected and taken a lot more seriously than any of the clickbait mills, to the point that even MSM outlets like MSNBC and CNN would occasionally cite them as a source even in the pre-TDS days.

They lost a lot of their mainstream relevance well before their demise, but they also weren't a major target for mockery like your average clickbait mill.

Also, part of why VICE got as big as they did was because they were a counter-culture zine long before they became the main lefty hipster clickbait mill and because of that, Bill Maher was able to get them a TV deal with HBO.

Fast forward to 2019 and not only has Maher distanced himself from VICE as much as possible, but their TV deal is at an end and HBO is going to throw VICE out like last week's garbage by the end of the year.

The rest of the clickbait mills aren't doing any better and are likely even worse off.

I'm going to second what @Harvey Danger said about how the lowered bar of entry into the media has led us to a point where we've finally hit the ceiling and soon the only people who will have any use for all that mined data are the NSA and the Chinese government.
 
"The capital you function on in news media is trust. You lose some of that every time your readers or viewers figure out you sold a lie to them."
-Brian Cates​

You can't build a news outlet on lies. It's not a sustainable model. Click-bait and hyper-partisan reporting can net you some serious short-term gains, but over the long haul people are going to get tired of breathlessly running to their friends/political opponents with whatever hot take you cooked up only to get slapped down when they point out the lie. Once that 'burns' people too many times they'll quit fucking reading your news; they'll get sick of you making them look like a jackass.

That's the best-case scenario, too. The worst-case scenario is that they'll encounter the truth and then start reading up on the "other side" of the argument and then get pissed off because not only did you lie to them, but you lied to them to expressly to turn them away from an idea that they might have otherwise agreed with. Every time these companies tell a lie, they run the risk of causing someone to jump ship, and these people tell a lot of lies.

As always: If Far-Left progressivism is the wave of the future and everyone wants it, why do these people keep shutting down while the moderates and conservatives continue to grow?
 
"The capital you function on in news media is trust. You lose some of that every time your readers or viewers figure out you sold a lie to them."
-Brian Cates​

You can't build a news outlet on lies. It's not a sustainable model. Click-bait and hyper-partisan reporting can net you some serious short-term gains, but over the long haul people are going to get tired of breathlessly running to their friends/political opponents with whatever hot take you cooked up only to get slapped down when they point out the lie. Once that 'burns' people too many times they'll quit fucking reading your news; they'll get sick of you making them look like a jackass.

True. But, taking a page from Scott Adams, you can build an opinion outlet with the veneer of reporting based on lies and slant. People want to consume what makes them feel good. And for Big Important Internet Arguments it's more important to have an authority to cite than to prove it's The Truth. You just need to not have it blown up as blatantly false in an objective, tweet-summarizable manner.

The irony is that ThinkProgress was more of a proper journalistic outfit than an outright liar. Its stated ideology, progressivism, was built on lies and bullshit; but the outlet itself was brought down by the purity spiral on the left, not by being discredited. They got in trouble for going after lefties they didn't view as progressive enough, while catering solely to progressives; they split their audience of their own volition.

I'm not going to mourn their loss, but I am going to start citing it to counter the "niche media is the future" arguments.
 
"I disapprove of what you say, but I would die for your right to say it. But I won't cry if you're too insufferable and stupid to stay in the market, so see ya bitches."
--Voltaire or something I dunno

That wouldn't even apply in this situation because TP was never censored. They were just unpopular and couldn't make enough money/traction to keep alive. Ditto with ContraPoints: she was never censored, she got booed out of her own platform.

That's why censorship never works and it's better to allow the stupid to talk freely and openly.
 
Good stuff. It'll be even greater once we see Vice spiraling down the shitter after the end of this year
 
Back
Top Bottom