I notice it was a response to the first amended complaint. It happened, obviously, but I would have assumed you can't amend your original complaint until the defendant had filed his answer.
But anyway, just like with the Vic case Zaid seemed to be throwing everything and the kitchen sink into the mix. Which makes sense, since if he doesn't say it now he can't bring it up later. Then again, this seems cookie cutter. Libel-proof? Really?
View attachment 1147000
So here's something I don't know about. I know the TI-EC happened in Texas, but this is going federal since Waid's in CA while Meyer is in Texas. Now the question is, is truth a defense for tortoise interference with existing contracts in federal? I know it's not in Texas because Texas is weird about the restatement of torts. Obviously the point is moot if Waid was a lying sack of shit, but hypothetically.