It sounds like he wants his own personal tortious interference, unlawful restraint of trade and racketeering lawsuits.
No joke, this brainless asshole is proudly endorsing goals that have a strong possibility of making any actions he takes towards them illegal. Has this fucking showboat do-nothing TV lawyer ever even read the definitions of the causes of action his own client is being sued over?
Except it isn't. At all.
"White supremacist" may not be libelous per se but it is fairly easy to demonstrate that it is inherently an extremely damaging accusation that tends to destroy someone's reputation and career if believed.
That sounds very like something Waid would do. Those texts with Antarctic sure demonstrate the sort of behavior of someone who has been on the "abusive ex harassing his last victim" train before.
Yes, it is incredibly stupid, even by Zaid standards. His client is on trial defending, not a plaintiff. He is being sued for illegally trying to put people out of business, something he has basically admitted in deposition already after extensive discovery that, thanks to the "defense" so far, was allowed to happen even before a motion to dismiss. In fact, the tack of the "defense" literally led straight to the discovery.
So he's admitting the motivation to destroy the plaintiff and random other people. Unlawful restraint of trade. Unfair competition. Any number of FTC actionable conducts. Racketeering even.