Culture Review: Ready Player Two deserves a ruthless force-quit - GAMERGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATE!!!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://thespinoff.co.nz/books/07-12-2020/review-ready-player-two-deserves-a-ruthless-force-quit/

Nine years ago, the author Ernest Cline published the monster hit Ready Player One. Somehow, despite being a huge gamer nerd, Sam Brooks managed to avoid it – until now. We also made him read the sequel, which came out last month. Sorry, Sam.

Ready Player One is an ode to the kind of white nerd culture that has taken a quite deserving beating in the years since its release.

Here’s a passage that occurs not far into the sequel, Ready Player Two:

We lost our virginity to each other three days after that first kiss. Then we spent the rest of that week sneaking off to make the beast with two backs at every opportunity. Like Depeche Mode, we just couldn’t get enough.

Throughout this book’s bloated 384 pages, I kept coming back to this passage. Not only is it a symphony of bad writing, but each sentence builds on the previous to create a weird mini-narrative that is remarkably disrespectful of both the story and its readers.

The first sentence by itself? Fine. It’s not elegant, and it skates over a significant development in two major characters’ lives, but it’s not inherently offensive. The second? Simply reading the unironic use of “the beast with two backs” makes you feel worse about the narrator, the author and yourself. And the third? Well, that’s the worst thing to happen to Depeche Mode since the 80s clocked over into the 90s.

However, there is one good thing about this passage: it quite handily illustrates nearly everything that is wrong with Ready Player Two. So, in the interest of making lemonade from rotten lemons, I’ll use this passage as a way to interrogate where Ready Player Two fails, and how. Again, for emphasis: And how.



We lost our virginity to each other three days after that first kiss.

To catch you up a bit on Ready Player One: it’s set in 2045, after climate change and an energy crisis has pushed the world into a tech-dystopia. To escape their grim reality, people hook into a VR-type situation called the OASIS, which is one part MMORPG and one part social substitute. James Halliday, a barely-veiled Steve Jobs and the creator of OASIS, dies and leaves behind a series of clues, all relating to his obsession with 1980s pop culture. Anybody solving these clues will gain access to his vast fortune and also control of the OASIS. The plot follows socially awkward nerd Wade Watts as he figures out all the clues, and the book ends with him being literally on top of the world, essentially a somewhat benevolent tech dictator.


The prose of Ready Player One was fairly rudimentary, but you could forgive that due to some pretty inventive world building and action set pieces. In the sequel, though, Cline takes a full step back, ditching any sort of elegance or beauty in favour of getting through the plot as quickly as possible. The prologue of Ready Player Two skips through what could, and should, be a novel in itself: a new system called ONI, which takes virtual reality one step forward by allowing users to step into and experience other people’s lives, is discovered by Wade in the first few pages. Over one scant chapter, this technology becomes an addiction for the entire planet. The conversation where Wade and his allies from the first book, Samantha, Aech and Shoto, decide to release this technology to the public is rendered thusly:

We didn’t make our decision lightly. We weighed all of the pros and cons. Then, after a heated debate, the four of us held a vote.

Why not show us that conversation? There is meaty philosophy to wrangle with here. Just what are the implications of giving the public access to a technology that, in effect, allows them to enact any fantasy without any material consequences? Instead of addressing this Cline vaults over it in a few sentences.

The entire book is written this way – as though it’s been written by someone editing the Wikipedia page for the book. Even when the novel’s actual plot begins (another quest, albeit with higher stakes) the only time that Cline’s prose really takes off is during the action sequences. Even then the writing has the cadence of a precocious child recounting a fantasy game they played with friends during lunch. Every sentence reads as though it should be prefixed with a breathless “and then”.

I’ll take enthusiastic world-building over dispassionate plot progression any day. Unfortunately, the book has significantly more of the latter. Cline is the kind of writer who will devote multiple paragraphs to explaining the new security system of Wade’s billion-dollar home, and only one to Wade losing his virginity to the love interest, Samantha/Art3mis, of the previous book.

Then again, maybe we should be thankful he only devoted the one sentence to it.

(To fend off the nerd-pedants, there is a second more oblique passage, earlier in the book: “I was truly, madly, deeply in love with Samantha. And I was still reeling from losing my virginity to her just a few days earlier.” )

Then we spent the rest of that week sneaking off to make the beast with two backs at every opportunity.

About halfway through, I wondered if I was being too harsh on Cline. Maybe his simplistic, overly-explanatory and surface-level prose was his way of getting us inside the head of Wade. The awkward nerd of the first book turns tech billionaire in this one, and he dives into those excesses rampantly. He abuses his newfound omnipotence in every way possible, although the reader is reminded, in a way that feels editor-lead rather than author-lead, that Wade is aware that he’s being a jerk.

This is most egregious, unsurprisingly, in his treatment of women. Early on in the story, Wade starts cyberstalking his ex-girlfriend: “Since I’d already violated her privacy, I decided to go full-on Big Brother and have a look at her headset feeds.” To Cline’s credit, he presents this as the huge moral transgression that it is, but he quickly forgives Wade, and handwaves any lasting damage that his actions might have.

The backbone of the plot involves Wade seeing the world through the eyes of Kira, the unrequited love of Halliday (the Steve Jobs stand-in) through the ONI. He relives her experiences and slowly begins to build an understanding of this woman. But even this is facile, and Wade’s understanding is summed up, as so many things in this damn book are, with one sentence. After spending some time inside Kira’s head, and her lived experience, he feels “closer to [her] now, more aware of her as a human being”.

If you feel gross or weird about that, it’s because it’s gross and weird. The idea of VR as some revolutionary technology to hardwire empathy into people is one that’s long been criticised, and I’d frankly say debunked. VR doesn’t make you aware of somebody else’s experiences, it makes you hyper-aware of the limits of your own experience. Even if we were to go along with Cline’s idea that being inside Kira’s head makes Wade a more understanding, empathetic person, none of that is borne out by how Wade thinks, talks or acts for the rest of the novel. He’s still the omnipotent global dictator that he is at the start of the book, just with more awareness that he’s a jerk.

But awareness means nothing without action, and Wade still acts like any socially awkward nerd acts when he’s given a modicum of power, let alone unlimited power: he’s an absolute asshole. And the way Cline writes him, he’s an asshole who can only express himself in cliches, run-on sentences stuffed with more proper nouns than an acceptance speech, and exhausting cultural references.

For example, the below moment is meant to be a climactic moment of understanding between Wade and his poor girlfriend Samantha:

“I remember,” I said. “After she died, you would rewatch those movies, to feel closer to her, and to better understand who she was. I remember telling you that I did the same thing with my dad’s comic book collection, after he died.”

Look, there’s a minute chance that Cline is so inside the head of his protagonist, Wade, that his poor prose is a choice rather than a reflection of his ability. You know, like Lolita without the paedophilia. But Wade Watts is no Humbert Humbert, and Ernest Cline is sure as shit no Vladimir Nabokov.

Like Depeche Mode, we just couldn’t get enough.

At least Prince is dead so he didn’t have to read how Ready Player Two depicts him.

One of the force-quit moments for readers of Ready Player One was deciding they were simply unable to deal with the barrage of cultural references. They were cacophonous, and if you’re in Ernest Cline’s demographic then chances are you enjoyed them. There’s nothing wrong with that – god knows if there was a book called It’s Me Cathy that pulled together references to the Bronte sisters, Kate Bush and all things in between I would not care to hear any criticism of it.

Cline’s use of pop culture in his novels is nerd wish fulfillment at its most ridiculous. It asks the question: what if your deeply specific knowledge of cultural touchstones could actually solve all your problems, rather than just make you deeply annoying at dinner parties? Ready Player One answered that question with varying degrees of success, while ignoring the fact that Wade’s skill was just a moderately deep knowledge of ’80s pop culture. It’d be more remarkable if Wade, as a white nerd, didn’t know about Star Wars at all, for example.

Cline runs into an inevitable problem writing about the past from the viewpoint of the future: the present is going to get in the way. So while the cultural references of the first book might’ve been fine in 2011 – and that’s a terse stretch of the word “fine” – a book populated solely with nostalgia for art made by white nerds is not going to fly in 2020. (Which is to say nothing of the bizarre logic of these kids being obsessed with ’80s pop culture, which is like if teens these days were obsessed with ’40s pop culture. Again, give me that book.)
Wishing that Cline had a bigger pool of references feels like wishing upon a monkey paw, which I can only assume is curled up something fierce in the author’s home. Still, I don’t think anybody would have expected him to write a sequence in which his protagonist is offered sage advice by DJ Spinderella from Salt ‘n Pepa rapping the chorus to ‘Push It’.

That’s just a few pages, though. Even worse is an entire section, an act even, of the book being devoted to Prince. While told energetically, Cline seems to fail to understand any of what made Prince a once in a generation talent: he blended genre, bent gender, and transgressed both industry and art, all within the boundaries of pop music. Prince probably would’ve hated everything about Ready Player Two, not just his own depiction, which reduces him to “The Royal Badness” and little else. (Cline’s understanding of gender is too much to get into at length here. You can probably guess it’s not great, but it’s worth bringing up the moment where Wade encounters a trans woman, and Cline spends the next few pages interrogating his sexual response to her. Moving on.)

So yes, Cline’s references to art made by women and people of colour is deeply tokenistic, but so are all his references. It was better in Ready Player One, when those references were grafted onto a plot about an impoverished kid triumphing against a mega-corporation, but in the second book, where that same kid is a multi-billionaire, reading those references feels like watching a snake gag on its own tail and then throw up. Cline isn’t a good enough writer to weave the references in elegantly, so there are horribly awkward sentences like this:

This had to be Kira’s drunken stepfather, Graham – who was clearly enraged, and only keeping his distance thanks to the cricket bat that Og was clutching with both hands and brandishing threateningly, like Shaun of the Dead.

Yikes. Not only does the reference take the reader out of the horrifying, triggering situation, that’s not even what Shaun is called in Shaun of the Dead! He’s just Shaun. It takes a special lack of talent to combine bad writing with soulless writing, but Cline’s managed to do it. In the world of the novel, he’s taking from the graveyard of culture to honour what is long past and forgotten. In the real world, he’s cashing in on the love that audiences have for his artistic superiors.

The one saving grace of the Depeche Mode reference, the unfortunate chaser to a cursed cocktail, is that it comes early enough in the book that you won’t feel bad putting it down. Enjoy the silence.

Ready Player Two, by Ernest Cline (Century, $37) is available from Unity Books Auckland and Wellington.

Take a drink every time you see the phrase "white nerd".
 
The whole premise of nerd culture is that it's a place where people who don't feel comfortable in mainstream spaces come together and do things that they like. Somehow they've got it in their heads that only white men become socially awkward and pursue these interests. Their explanation for this is Dobsonesque: The only reason a white person would be excluded from anything would be because he is sexually and socially inadequate and thus this also means he is racist. In their warped narrative, every other shade always gets along perfectly in their imagined utopia, while overcome by the glorious multiculturalism of the future, the mayonnaise ghoul retreats into his basement.

Being the privileged social outcast that he is, whitey is able to afford comics and vidya whilst Sam Brooks is getting AIDS from his theater instructor so he gets to call everyone else an incel. In his mind, very single wog on the planet like me is doing constructive things like chanting leftist mantras for all eternity while whitey is horribly oppressing us by masturbating to Lara Croft instead of some hundred pound tranny. Us coloured boys don't think politically incorrect thoughts, not ever, nuh uh. We don't have human desires at all and that never, ever shows in the art we make. All women are immutable goddesses, and to depict them in evil ways would be sacrilege. Nobody would ever become a social outcast and turn to video games for solace unless they are bad people who think bad thoughts.

I'm a Chinese immigrant who absolutely despises, fucking loathes their narrative about nerd culture being inherently white supremacist according to the outrageous lies and assumptions of gamergate hangers on. I've always been the one asian guy in a room full of whites, or the one asian guy who can't speak Chinese in a room of asians who can. It didn't help that I was also autistic, and embarassed myself so often that talking to other people was a fucking nightmare for me. As you can imagine, I never really fit in.

This led to me really liking video games and cartoons growing up, particularly more than my peers. I know a lot of other people, immigrants too, who're like that. What pisses me off right here is that Sam Brooks is so hopped up on narrative, he's ignored the fact that people like us exist. What he's done was that he projected himself, his shitty ideology, and the lies he's gargled on in twitter, into entire fucking ethnicities.

Sam Brooks is a lying, disingenuous piece of shit human tapeworm who perpetuates a bullshit narrative that makes no sense.


He looks like a smarmy, spineless piece of shit in highschool who pretends to be your friend for one day and shit talks you the other. I've known a number of individuals who behave and write like he does, the kind who use a facade of righteousness to get whatever they want. Wouldn't be surprised if he's a rotten, annoying little asshole IRL.
It's such bullshit, how did nerd culture find itself in such a nightmare from what it was a decade ago?

And the first RPO book is a great snapshot of what it used to be, everyone immersed and enjoying nerd culture, nobody giving a shit about what race or gender you are, it's an even more appealing fantasy than it was in 2011.
 
Ernest Cline is a left-leaning woke beardo and he dialed up the woke for his shitty sequel. And for some damn reason, they're still crucifying him for writing a spergy book that's the equivalent of a popcorn flick.

What more do these people want from him?

Ready Player One isn't even political and the Woke Left just seems to hate it on it anyway and for no other reason than it's about escapism without trying to push a political agenda.

RPO may be poorly written sperging about the 80's, but how the fuck is it an alt-right/white supremacist/Gamergate/insert boogeyman thing?

Because it's not trying to be "deep" and pretentious high art garbage and isn't preaching some kind of critical theory or intersectional leftist baloney? It's an autistic 1980's nostalgia fest, not the goddamn Communist Manifesto. If you're trying to find intellectualism or any kind of meaning or didacticism in a book written by an aging Gen X dork, look elsewhere.

Cline's a sperg and a shitty writer, but the one thing I hate more than Ready Player One is the Woke Leftists and radfems who hate RPO purely for political reasons and not because it's a shoddy book

RPO sucks, but why can't we just have fiction written purely for the sake of entertainment? Why can't a story just be a story? Why is the mere concept of escapism seen as "problematic" to the Woke Left and "degenerate" to the traditionalists?

I get that escapism in excess is a bad thing, but in moderation, there is no problem with it. There's a time and a place for everything, even "problematic" things like fun or escapism. So long as it's done with a sense of moderation and you don't neglect any of your everyday responsibilities or become an obsessive sperg, there is no problem.

Pseudo-intellectualism, asceticism and pretentiousness does not automatically make someone a better person than the hedonists they maniacally shriek at.
 
Last edited:
It's such bullshit, how did nerd culture find itself in such a nightmare from what it was a decade ago?

And the first RPO book is a great snapshot of what it used to be, everyone immersed and enjoying nerd culture, nobody giving a shit about what race or gender you are, it's an even more appealing fantasy than it was in 2011.
It didn't just happen. This was done to it.
 
RPO sucks, but why can't we just have fiction written purely for the sake of entertainment? Why can't a story just be a story? Why is the mere concept of escapism seen as "problematic" to the Woke Left and "degenerate" to the traditionalists?
"Everything is political, everything is problematic, and you have to point it out."

In the eyes of the Left and the shrieking harpies that make up their attack and DARVO forces, the idea of escapism means you are priveledged enough to be able to escape, even from one fucking second to the next, that you are a [FILL IN BLANK] and that evil white cis-patriarchy Orange Man supporters will triple rape and double murder you at any second.

Escapism is the ULTIMATE evil of these groups. Commies don't like it because why should you need to escape glorious communism, comrade. Leftists and SJW attack dogs hate it because "what are you trying to escape from, comrade?"

With traditionalist, escapism in moderation is OK.

With fundie fucking weirdos, escapism means removing yourself from God/Allah/Hari Krishna's divine light and plan and you don't think you know better than God, do you?
 
It didn't just happen. This was done to it.
I know and you can't even imagine how angry it makes me.

The irony is these fucks have only Redpilled me far more than I ever would have been otherwise, to the degree that I unironically question is Nazism is right, which still shocks me but shit, when the people who throw around "Nazi" at the drop of a hat are clearly the worst scumbags you can imagine, Nazi doesn't sound so bad.

All we wanted to do was have some fun and be left the fuck alone, but nope, can't have that, we just can't have that.

So fuck 'em.
 
Ernest Cline is a left-leaning woke beardo and he dialed up the woke for his shitty sequel. And for some damn reason, they're still crucifying him for writing a spergy book that's the equivalent of a popcorn flick.

What more do these people want from him?

Ready Player One isn't even political and the Woke Left just seems to hate it on it anyway and for no other reason than it's about escapism without trying to push a political agenda.

RPO may be poorly written sperging about the 80's, but how the fuck is it an alt-right/white supremacist/Gamergate/insert boogeyman thing?

Because it's not trying to be "deep" and pretentious high art garbage and isn't preaching some kind of critical theory or intersectional leftist baloney? It's an autistic 1980's nostalgia fest, not the goddamn Communist Manifesto. If you're trying to find intellectualism or any kind of meaning or didacticism in a book written by an aging Gen X dork, look elsewhere.

Cline's a sperg and a shitty writer, but the one thing I hate more than Ready Player One is the Woke Leftists and radfems who hate RPO purely for political reasons and not because it's a shoddy book

RPO sucks, but why can't we just have fiction written purely for the sake of entertainment? Why can't a story just be a story? Why is the mere concept of escapism seen as "problematic" to the Woke Left and "degenerate" to the traditionalists?

I get that escapism in excess is a bad thing, but in moderation, there is no problem with it. There's a time and a place for everything, even "problematic" things like fun or escapism. So long as it's done with a sense of moderation and you don't neglect any of your everyday responsibilities or become an obsessive sperg, there is no problem.

Pseudo-intellectualism, asceticism and pretentiousness does not automatically make someone a better person than the hedonists they maniacally shriek at.
pretention.JPG
 
The movie was a lot less bad. At the very least it had the advantage of cg visuals of stuff interacting, instead of just the lists of stuff that was the book.
Spielberg put a lot of Spielberg in fixing the story and really turned it into a Cyber-Goonies. I found it to be a pleasant popcorn flick, in the atmosphere of "sci fi is mostly dead now, unless you like Jupiter Ascending." I'd probably never read the book though.
 
Bruh; so the trick is to play ball,
when you get into nerd shit, just shuffle some Afro-futurism in there, ya know like Wakanda and shit, and then when they try to peg you for something, you peg them.

Also Rico from starship troopers was hispanic, check m8 clintos
 
The left hated RPO because it was a straight white male hero who pursued and ended up with a straight white female. And had a happy ending where they won. That's totally unacceptable.

The irony of all the CONSOOMers missing the book's anti-corporate warnings still cracks me up the most, though.
 
I think I would have liked the movie better if I did not read the book. From a writing standpoint the movie was better, but it the crossovers were more interesting and cooler in the books.

Max headroom and a pseudo super robot wars would have been nice, that's all im saying.
 
I think I would have liked the movie better if I did not read the book. From a writing standpoint the movie was better, but it the crossovers were more interesting and cooler in the books.

Max headroom and a pseudo super robot wars would have been nice, that's all im saying.
the movie giving us The Iron Giant killing the shit out of stuff was pretty funny
 
I think I would have liked the movie better if I did not read the book. From a writing standpoint the movie was better, but it the crossovers were more interesting and cooler in the books.

Max headroom and a pseudo super robot wars would have been nice, that's all im saying.
I feel the same way, the book was able to so much better convey just how much OASIS is truly a world of everything in a way the movie just couldn't do as well.
 
Wasn't Ready Player One just Twilight for dudes? I don't see the point getting worked up about it either way. It's goofy wish fulfillment Mary Sue story, nothing more, nothing less.
View attachment 1891325
View attachment 1891334
Okay, OP, I give up. What is this thing supposed to be, and do I need light magic or dark magic to peacefully sunset it for XP/loot?
The face looks male, but the hips, clothes, and the fact the article calls it a him makes me think it's actually a really ugly woman that low-effort trooned out. Generally if you see a creature like that that was born with a penis it won't want to be referred to as a him, and if it does there's a 90% chance it was born with a vagina.

I could be wrong and it's just a really ugly femme gay dude. But I think there's a strong possibility this one is actually a women (just a very ugly one that wants to pretend she's something else).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom