- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
They heavily overestimate how complicated most modern firearms are. The leap from muzzle loaders to revolvers and auto loaders had more to do with technological advances in ammunition than the actual engineering of firearms. Precision tooling was necessary for the advancement as well, but to say that an engineer in 1760 couldn't imagine a repeating firearm is just retarded. If they were about 150 years more advanced in chemistry and machining, George Washington would have had an M249 mounted to the front of his row boat.I mean, according to le enlightened redditors, it somehow makes more sense that you should be able to own a grapeshot-filled cannon that turns people into chunks of meat rather than a standard caliber handgun.
Though what really bugs me is the idea of modern NPCs that everyone in the past was stupid because they didn't carry smartphones around or be able to buy luxury cat beds off Amazon using a smart refrigerator. This isn't limited to leftists (see: ancient aliens people), but you see it a lot with them on constitutional topics. As if people 200 years ago, who were biologically indistinct from us in terms of brain structure and capacity, just couldn't imagine a firearm that took less time to load, carried more ammunition, was smaller, and could shoot more rapidly than what they had access to. No, clearly those stone age dummies thought that the world was technologically stagnant and the principles that they thoughtfully laid out after much debate wouldn't take into account basic mechanical improvement of the most elementary functions of firearms. We enlightened moderns just know better, after all.
They also don't get that the firearms at the time of the founding aren't even considered firearms today. Black powder firearms aren't legally recognized as guns so they skirt a shitload of laws that the "you should only own muskets" crowd demands. No background checks, direct to customer shipping, no sales record storage requirements, felons can own them, etc.


