Red Letter Media

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Favorite recurring character? (Select 4)

  • Jack / AIDSMobdy

    Votes: 257 24.0%
  • Josh / the Wizard

    Votes: 77 7.2%
  • Colin (Canadian #1)

    Votes: 460 42.9%
  • Jim (Canadian #2)

    Votes: 230 21.4%
  • Tim

    Votes: 386 36.0%
  • Len Kabasinski

    Votes: 208 19.4%
  • Freddie Williams

    Votes: 274 25.5%
  • Patton Oswalt

    Votes: 27 2.5%
  • Macaulay Culkin

    Votes: 541 50.4%
  • Max Landis

    Votes: 64 6.0%

  • Total voters
    1,073
Why are we even discussing box office? It's about as interesting as comparing console or game sales. Sure, it's sad if a movie I like flops because it means that more movies like it probably won't get made in the future. Other than that I couldn't care less.

The financial side of moviemaking is only interesting to me if a film looks great, but was made with a really low budget. Two of my favorite movies were made for peanuts, but don't stand out compared to movies made for tens of millions of dollars. Most viewers probably don't even notice the obvious signs: only a few actors, barely any sets, almost no special effects etc.
Box office is an objective measure of general interest and can be data points in an emerging trend. It's necessary to tell if good movies or slop will continue. So far, slop is winning because the artsy movies also suck as art and as business.
 
Honestly, why should they even care about monetization at this point?
Youtube doesn't just demonetize anymore. They're openly threatening to delete channels for wrongthink, not just demonetize them. I don't know if RLM has received any such admonitions, but even I've been "warned" by their automated systems that my account could be deleted for posting the most milquetoast comments. Full masks-off mode.
 
Youtube doesn't just demonetize anymore. They're openly threatening to delete channels for wrongthink, not just demonetize them. I don't know if RLM has received any such admonitions, but even I've been "warned" by their automated systems that my account could be deleted for posting the most milquetoast comments. Full masks-off mode.
YouTube only occasionally warns you when posting comments, but I have noticed they censor your comments over all sorts of shit without warning all the time. I have started editing and re-posting my comments as a point of rule now if I ever bother commenting at all. Protip: If it errors out and fails to edit then that means the comment got removed. You can also just right click the date next to any comment and open in private window to see if it's censored.

One thing I have noticed recently is YouTube's extreme crackdown on gore. Simulated gore in video games and movies. More YouTubers I watch have started overly censoring all of the good shit. I am sure RLM just cuts those parts out from their viewings unless something really funny happened, in which case they censor. Really annoying. I wish RLM would upload an uncensored version of whatever video they make to their Patreon, but that would mean a little bit of extra work in making a Director's Cut and so they can't do that.
 
One thing I have noticed recently is YouTube's extreme crackdown on gore.
Yeah I've seen that too. The "true crime" crowd must be shitting bricks about that; "shocking" photos behind "sensitive content" warnings are their bread & butter.
 
YouTube only occasionally warns you when posting comments, but I have noticed they censor your comments over all sorts of shit without warning all the time. I have started editing and re-posting my comments as a point of rule now if I ever bother commenting at all. Protip: If it errors out and fails to edit then that means the comment got removed. You can also just right click the date next to any comment and open in private window to see if it's censored.

One thing I have noticed recently is YouTube's extreme crackdown on gore. Simulated gore in video games and movies. More YouTubers I watch have started overly censoring all of the good shit. I am sure RLM just cuts those parts out from their viewings unless something really funny happened, in which case they censor. Really annoying. I wish RLM would upload an uncensored version of whatever video they make to their Patreon, but that would mean a little bit of extra work in making a Director's Cut and so they can't do that.

The worst one I've seen recently I just stumbled across today -- some crime channel screening clips from Breaking Bad censored the word "moron." YouTube has really got to get some competition.
 
The worst one I've seen recently I just stumbled across today -- some crime channel screening clips from Breaking Bad censored the word "moron." YouTube has really got to get some competition.
Some hardcore woke types consider moron to be a slur these days.

What a bunch of retards.
 
Talking more about how much theaters suck... RLM is still my top 3 YouTube channels ever, but if they keep harping on this subject and let it poison their other shows, I could see it souring the fan base.

Just talk about things you like, there's enough negativity in the world, you don't need to apply it to art and hobbies. It isn't their job to save movies. They could be leading an old movie renaissance in the younger generation, as they have quietly done. Every Re:View causes a 30 year old movie to trend on Prime, and gets kids into old media. DO THAT!
Dude, it's a rejected rambling from Spitballs and it is from the past, chill.
 
Youtube doesn't just demonetize anymore. They're openly threatening to delete channels for wrongthink, not just demonetize them. I don't know if RLM has received any such admonitions, but even I've been "warned" by their automated systems that my account could be deleted for posting the most milquetoast comments. Full masks-off mode.
One of the key problems with Youtube is that they use speech-to-text to detect the no-no words. Of course they'll never tell you which words are the ones that will get you in trouble because Youtube is run by bots and not real people.

DMCA is another one. From what I understand, anyone can give you a copyright strike and it's up to YOU as the channel owner to prove your innocence. The only way to do this is by consulting a real lawyer and sending a counter-claim with your real name on it. I'm saying this because I got a DMCA strike once from a guy who just didn't like me very much and there was nothing I could do. It's all backwards.
 
DMCA is another one. From what I understand, anyone can give you a copyright strike and it's up to YOU as the channel owner to prove your innocence. The only way to do this is by consulting a real lawyer and sending a counter-claim with your real name on it.
Standard doxing technique at this point. You don't actually need to consult a lawyer at that stage either btw. It's enough to say "nuh-uh." They can reply back "yeah-huh!" and Youtube will take it at face value, take down the video and hit you with a strike, but it's in no way any kind of "legal" victory. There's no judgment (or even ruling) against you. In fact, if you pay close attention to the exact wording Youtube uses, they're not even DMCA claims. They're "copyright claims" and "copyright strikes." It has literally nothing to do with the actual DMCA. Even a successful "copyright claim" takedown that results in a "copyright strike" in no way provides any kind of legal benefit to the claimant under the terms of the DMCA. If the claimant wants something from a court to spank you with, they still have to start from scratch.

It's all phony bullshit staged by Youtube. They whipped it together in a panic back when the copyright cartel (the companies that pushed the DMCA through in the 90's -- the RIAA, MPAA, all those shitheads) started making noises they were going to start going hard after Youtube and the other hangers-on at the time. Google realized the cartel was just going to start rapid-firing copyright infringement lawsuits at Youtube instead of playing "by the rules" with actual DMCA claims, and by the time Youtube eventually prevailed in court (not a 100% guarantee either, even with the safe harbor provision of the DMCA), there'd be lots of fallout and costs. It had shades of Microsoft's old "FUD" attacks against Linux -- use the threat of endless litigation to discourage people from "risking" using Linux. Google promised to make it trivial for the cartels to hassle individuals, and they cheerfully accepted.
 
Youtube doesn't care about Fair Use, either. But you probably already know that. What bothers me is that the claim automatically deletes your video. It's not just unavailable - it's gone. Although maybe it does get restored somehow if the asshole who gave you the strike gives up, I dunno.

When Dailymotion's bots detected copyrighted music in my video, at least they gave me whole 24 hours to do something before they deleted it. 👌
 
Dude, it's a rejected rambling from Spitballs and it is from the past, chill.
This back to back to back with "Half in the Bag: Movies Suck!" and "Black Void: Movies SUCK!!" only to go to "Snippet of something where we talk about how MOVIES SUCK!!!" is just too much. I don't know if it's Mike or Jay or both, but they can't leave the subject alone and are using it to nosedive the vibe of the channel.

BTW, just watched Sinners, and it sucks. It is yet another movie that provokes white guilt, and requires that every critic sucks it off, just like Black Panther. Coogler seems to excel at these types of projects. Even divorcing the movie from the DEEPLY baked in racial messaging, its action and horror aspects fail to come close to the movies they're ripping off: The Thing and From Dusk Til Dawn.
 
And btw (sorry for the double post) this missing woman case that make Jay laugh so much, that's Gabby Petito. She was killed by her boyfriend during a hiking trip.
View attachment 7264740
That's disgusting. There is nothing that sickens me more than seeing Americans export the worst aspects of their culture. I don't want to fed post so I'm going to try and calm down. Please don't show me this. I'm very upset right now and it's past my bed time.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=UPt9pGfpmS0
Again, I don't think they're woke. A woke person IMO is someone who's a lot more vocal and passionate about those things. They just don't seem to understand the idea that people divide based on ethnicity and nationality and it's not in their (white guys') interest to say anything good specificially about the blacks or bad about the whites.

Remember when Like Like Stoklasa got upset because an African in Last Vampire On Earth had AIDS? "This movie is racist right off the bat!". He was 100% serious and nobody confronted him about it.
Thinking RLM turned woke is silly. There's no reason to think they were never not milquetoast leftists. Making fun of triggers and girl bosses doesn't mean they're hip to the JQ and want a Christian theocracy.
Whether they are brainwashed from birth to be anti-White, or newly-woke [which is just a new coat of paint on anti-Whiteness]:
ghibli tiresome empire.webp
Point is that the idea that China minimizes or removes black people from posters intentionally is probably not true, they care more about excessive violence, things that may upset "harmony" or "stability" and ghosts for some reason.
I'd just like to racistly point out that "spook" means both "ghost" and "nigger." CHINA NUMBAH ONE.
 
I didn't know anything about Coogler. Looks like his first movie was about a 2009 incarnation of St. George Floyd. I'm not even going to bother reading about this case, but $10 says the guy deserved it.
 
This back to back to back with "Half in the Bag: Movies Suck!" and "Black Void: Movies SUCK!!" only to go to "Snippet of something where we talk about how MOVIES SUCK!!!" is just too much. I don't know if it's Mike or Jay or both, but they can't leave the subject alone and are using it to nosedive the vibe of the channel.

BTW, just watched Sinners, and it sucks. It is yet another movie that provokes white guilt, and requires that every critic sucks it off, just like Black Panther. Coogler seems to excel at these types of projects. Even divorcing the movie from the DEEPLY baked in racial messaging, its action and horror aspects fail to come close to the movies they're ripping off: The Thing and From Dusk Til Dawn.
Why would you even expect a horror movie set in the deep south to not be a cringefest?

Dude.... what if vampires.... was racism.....
 
Wasn't the whole concept of vampires originally about the taboo nature of being queer?

Something, something about the most homophobic race maybe being afraid of being outed as queer...
It's hard to pin down 'originally' with vampires, because it goes back to prehistoric times. If you go by 'modern', I would think that would be Bram Stoker and I don't believe there was any woke queerness going on there. Anne Rice was the one that is responsible for that part IMO.
 
It's hard to pin down 'originally' with vampires, because it goes back to prehistoric times. If you go by 'modern', I would think that would be Bram Stoker and I don't believe there was any woke queerness going on there. Anne Rice was the one that is responsible for that part IMO.

Stoker's take on vampires was very much about the foreigner spreading filth and disease, and corrupting wholesome white women. If only the English had paid attention, huh? (No shade to my Kali-Ma bros; we've been sticking to the subcontinent where we belong since I, er, misplaced the Shankara Stones.)

As for vampires and "queerness," that goes back to at least Carmilla, which was about as openly lesbian as you could get in 1872 literature. Not sure on the gay male vampire archetype, but it was definitely present in The Fearless Vampire Killers, which predates Rice by a few years. She's certainly the one who popularized the modern conceit of it.
 
As for vampires and "queerness," that goes back to at least Carmilla, which was about as openly lesbian as you could get in 1872 literature. Not sure on the gay male vampire archetype, but it was definitely present in The Fearless Vampire Killers, which predates Rice by a few years. She's certainly the one who popularized the modern conceit of it
Oh yeah, I did forget about Fearless Vampire Killers. I haven't seen that movie in forever, but I remember thinking that Roman Polanski guy was a good actor and director (and Chinatown of course, hit bit part in that is a highlight. What a shame how that went right after all that...) . I never read any Rice, but I remember the movie of Interview was flat out full faggotry allegory.
 
Why would you even expect a horror movie set in the deep south to not be a cringefest?

Dude.... what if vampires.... was racism.....
I wanted to give it a chance against my better judgement. It had positive buzz around it, and was Coogler's "blank check" movie. I liked Creed well enough, so I thought I would be a nice white patron and support my BIPOC arts :) , perhaps it would be a dumb fun movie about vampires ! That seems like a cool original idea...

I then was treated to a non stop hateful racist movie about how my culture is evil and must be purged.

So basically I will never be that naive again.
 
Back
Top Bottom