Mike said he liked the Orville and Rich thinks the spiritual aspect of Star Wars was what originally made it unique. The issue is that RotJ turned it from relatively normal people with super powers and strong moral values to a Catholic nunnery. Uncle Ben was not emotionless. He had self-control, but he wasn't a flat line. RotJ with the Emperor introduced the Dark Side = anger/passion/hate, and then TPM expanded it into Dark Side = using emotions at all. ANH and TESB had room for people who used their emotions. You can use hate as a strong motivator, just don't let it control you. TESB had Vader's lust for power and his anger clashing with Luke's untempered love for his friends and ethical crusading. Thomas Aquinas was quite clear that virtues are not extremes the same way that sin is- temperance is not the opposite of gluttony, but a middle ground. Sex, food, drugs, these are not inherently evil and are basic needs or pleasures of life. The Catholic and Anglican Churches view alcohol as inherently good, with beer and wine specifically being singled out compared to spirits. A lot was also made of Ben and Yoda in the first two films being near-ascetic and outsiders of society, extrapolated to the entire concept of Jedi. The issue is that they were hiding from Imperial troops, not intentionally trying to live lives that were virtuous through ascetic contemplation. By the time of RotJ, being a Jedi means having no emotions, to the point that Luke forgoes self-defense. It's fine in the context of that one scene, but as always, George takes one line or one action or one scene and then ten years later expands it as a panacea for the entire concept.