Strange Wilderness
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 30, 2020
Hopefully fan reaction to Mike as senile Picard is positive and they take it as a "Q" to make a video based on their predictions for season 2. Mike can play senile Picard, Jay can play the doctor trying to reform immigration, and Rich can play Seven of Nine in drag protesting climate change.This show looks like a fucking trainwreck. I love Q, and the fact they roped him into this thing is just depressing.
Also Mike's senile Picard impression near the end was hilarious.
Assuming that doesn't get them canceled because it will be revealed that Stewart really does have dementia, Jay is not a POC and can't understand their experience, and showing Rich Evans in the Seven of Nine body suit is considered a crime against humanity.
What gets me is how lazy the whole thing is. Old Star Trek shows dealt with issues that were big at the current time but they did so in allegory. They'd beam down to a random planet and deal with the Vietnam War or the Civil Rights movement through aliens, robots, or lost colonies. You could have the cast of Picard go to a random planet and have them try to solve a problem where the societies energy source is causing the planets core to become magnetically unstable but the planet is resistant to a new energy source because they treat the warnings as a doomsday scenario. Have the cast then debate how to stop the planet from exploding and maybe some of the issues with changing energy sources so rapidly, like the new energy source could destabalize the planets atmosphere in the future. Instead they transport the cast to modern day Earth and hit viewers over the head with "climate change bad". Its like they didn't want to make any effort and if this wasn't a Star Trek show it would be a YouTube video of them all in a zoom call staring at the camera and virtue signalling.Amazing, it looks like they're trying to throw literally every single liberal talking point at the wall at once. Vaccine chips are part of our utopian future (please ignore that we rewrote season one of picard to show the future as being a bigoted angry shithole), illegal immigration, environmentalism, fascist (right wing only!) boogieman. Surely in a show with phasers that disintegrate people they wont also do guns r bad?
At least in the older episodes, like you said, they tried to humanize the other side. The crew of the Enterprise would have a conversation with the antagonist of the episode and at least their viewpoints would make some kind of sense. Like when Kirk and Kodos talked and Kodos tried to justify that his actions made sense with the information he had but it was clear that he felt guilt for what he had done. In Picard Kodos would go on a supervillain rant about how people who are different than him are weak and need to be destroyed and how he will make Tarsus IV great again. Also every Shakespeare reference would be explained to the viewer.Also I don't want to rain on Rich and Mike's glorious nostalgia for the past, but some of those star trek episodes from way back when were actually quite preachy. Granted no where near as bad as today, and they're right that they did a better job of humanising the other side, but some still managed to be on the nose.