RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
And, surprise surprise, it comes down to our favorite battleground of retards, Gamergate

upload_2016-2-17_20-34-15.png


I swear to god Gamergate is the gift that just keeps on giving.
 
How hard is it to walk out on your cheating wife and her lover? He must still be getting some, after he waits his turn, and he must think he's not going to get any anywhere else for him not to walk out.
 
Apparently he's quite wealthy via a trust fund or inheritance, so not only does he let his fat cheating wife cuckhold him, he financially supports her with his daddy's money for the privilege.
 
If he's got money, what's stopping him from having someone on the side? If his wife's gonna step out on him, I think he's justified in doing the same.
 
http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1629937&oldid=1629922

Michael Cohen defense squad BTFO.

Current vote is 11 (73%) for desysop and probation (DAP) to 4 (26%) for no action (NA), out of 15. It would require 2 additional NA votes and no additional DAP votes for NA to achieve the 1/3 minimum threshold, which appears unlikely.

Further, this coop case has become a massive shitfest source of drama, and (from my perspective) underscored Castaigne's bad behavior.

As such:

*puts on Moderator Hat*

I am suspending the customary 48 hour waiting period and enacting DAP:

  • Castaigne has been desysopped and put on probation until the coop rules him not probation-worthy.
  • On his first violation of probation, he shall be vandalbinned for a week. Second, banned for a week. Third, banned without limit, pending improbable appeal.
  • Violation of probation is the harassment of other users. Merely insulting other users isn't enough (given that's common), but attacking other users using slurs, or spamming users, or getting pissy about their talkpages, or messing with voting sections, or in general stepping outside of standard conversation norms in order to adopt a tough guy persona. Just use that old definition of porn: you know it when you see it.
If the vote drastically changes, I can always roll back the decision. Again, this appears unlikely. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 06:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 
There's also the question if it sticks and if it's actually enforced if it comes to it... But it's funny how his attempts to derail things in drama backfired pretty hard on him.

Can't wait for his response though. I predict a rant on how most people that wrong him end up in a hospital or somesuch, but he'll let it slide for just this once.
 
Wouldn't your energy be better directed at fighting things like psuedoscience instead of screaming ineffectually on talk pages and wasting everyone else's time? - Kitsunelaine 「SJW Illuminati shill.」 00:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh the irony.
 
Back
Top Bottom