Random Thoughts & Questions: MrEnter Edition

  • Thread starter Thread starter EI 903
  • Start date Start date
  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
You know, out of all of the embarassing things I've come to see in the Entersphere in the past four or five days, I have to say this is easily the most embarassing, and if my browser actually recorded browsing history, I would purge all of it just for coming in to direct contact with that page.

The amount of autism in that page is enough to fill a fucking ledger.

HE CANT WRITE.
 
So, can someone explain the appeal of this guy?

As a lolcow, he's kinda a combination of a bunch of different things: brony (he even called himself an "analyst"), manchild, narcissist, sperg, emotional trainwreck, pseudointellectual SJW, has a Tom Preston complex when it comes to taking criticism, Tumblrite mentality, and is completely way over his head about so many things just because he makes poorly edited videos bitching about childrens cartoons.

It's like why someone like benthelooney had a fanbase because basically what I think he is sort of like that kind of YouTuber with similar kind of spergy fans but on a much more massive scale.

Some people here have even compared him to someone like @Connor in how he writes and bitches about education and other topics. I hope that can explain part of why people are talking about him now. I think the Enter introduction thread here explains it much better than I can.

I think the biggest fun from discussing him though would be many of his fanboys, who are arguably way worse than he is and even some of the people that are the opposite too like what happened with NZ Drow for instance.
 
Last edited:
Enter posted another rant about copyright again: :roll:

http://mrenter.deviantart.com/art/Final-piece-of-proof-against-YouTube-copyright-520294503

hqoPTfN.png


I want you to take a very good look at this image, as it contains proof of how broken YouTube's copyright is and the full extent of it. If you remember correctly, this was one of the videos that was removed by Viacom and disputed. Because they did nothing to fight back against it, the claims were released. Sometime later, this video once again gets copyright ID matched. Not from Viacom, who essentially agreed that this was fair use, but by Viacom_Vobile and BBTV_Viacom.

So tell me Google, is Viacom just getting ad revenue off of this video twice now. Or is it the same ad revenue just split between Viacom and Viacom. I understand that certain companies have different "regions" as I've frequently gotten tagged by TBS of Latin America and Asia. Actually no I don't. For all intents and purposes these are of the same country and they own the same assets. They shouldn't be able to claim these things twice, and that's giving them the best benefit of the doubt. Hell knows what BBTV and Vobile means. Then again, I have been claimed by random letters, so...

And yes, these random other Viacom branches do reject disputes (thankfully they don't block the video at least). The sad part is, I don't think this is an oversight. It seems like an intentional function of the system. When a company is too lazy or whatever to actually keep track of the videos that they take down, Google is ready and willing to give them a second chance to claim ad revenue off of these things. I can see that Viacom is playing this game very well. When you can't get a video removed, claim it again and start getting ad revenue off of it. I also think that there's no better time to take on the YouTube Copyright school.,.. this Monday.

He then posted about it again on Twitter:

mgYMxad.png

And again, on Tumblr:
http://mrenter.tumblr.com/post/113675366784/anyone-see-anything-wrong-with-this-picture#notes

mE8O6gn.png
 
Enter posted another rant about copyright again: :roll:

http://mrenter.deviantart.com/art/Final-piece-of-proof-against-YouTube-copyright-520294503

hqoPTfN.png

He then posted about it again on Twitter:
[MEDIA=twitter]577030420992303104[/MEDIA]
mgYMxad.png

And again, on Tumblr:
http://mrenter.tumblr.com/post/113675366784/anyone-see-anything-wrong-with-this-picture#notes

mE8O6gn.png
curi011 2 minutes ago
Grr, the people of Viacom needs to die! They're ruining YouTube for everyone. They don't own the site. I don't get why videos that has fake links to watch episodes aren't taken down but homemade videos with any popular song are taken down right away due to copyright claim.
:story:
Guy looks legitimate too. Not even a troll.
 
Why doesn't he just post stills from the episodes and talk over them? That would solve this whole thing.
 
Is...that supposed to be to the tune of that Christmas Song "Do You Hear What I Hear"?

Idiot can't even do that right. First "line" is completely off tempo with how the words match the tune, and the second one doesn't even rhyme. Probably would have had better luck trying to do it off of "Do you hear the people crying"
 
Today's Pearls Before Swine was about Enter. They called him an Insecurasaurus.

"The Insecurasaurus wanted to impress his friends"

"So he used big words"

"But they were not impressed"

"So he made lots of money"

"But they were not impressed"

"So he dressed in the finest suits"

"But they were not impressed"

"So he found shallower friends"
 
From his DeviantArt:
"I also think that there's no better time to take on the YouTube Copyright school.,.. this Monday."

Take on? Why is it that every time some cartoon-obsessed sperg gets his shit taken down, he has to make it sound like a war or a struggle for a greater cause? You're not Gandhi, you're a loser nerd bitching about children's cartoons.
 
He always says he's "taking on" these bad cartoons. Like it's some kind of war or some shit.
 
From his DeviantArt:
"I also think that there's no better time to take on the YouTube Copyright school.,.. this Monday."

Take on? Why is it that every time some cartoon-obsessed sperg gets his shit taken down, he has to make it sound like a war or a struggle for a greater cause? You're not Gandhi, you're a loser nerd bitching about children's cartoons.
Most of them lack the self awareness required to comprehend the idea that not every action taken against them is some sort of war crime or act of tyranny.
 
He thinks Viacom is literally "afraid" of him, and that he's getting too powerful for them to handle.
 
@Clay Claymore: They think they're fighting a culture war, like they're the National Legion of Decency or something.

They think that they can win the American people away from bad cartoons. Of course, when those people love MLP...

(Incidentally, Clay, you got more videos coming?)

@Piga Dgrifm: Viacom probably doesn't know who he is. But to him, they're the Party and the Matrix rolled into one.
 
Here's the copyright school video he'll be sperging about tomorrow:

 
Back
Top Bottom