📚 Megathread Random Thoughts & Questions - ADF

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So the ballworm. Is it a literal worm in his balls? Am I retarded enough to look at the picture?
 
Personally I think Phil is more of an onion than a potato. He's disproportionately round, shockingly white, filthy, and his smell drives people to tears.
 
I enjoy how "our lady of Self Defense" has at least 3 completely illegal weapons.
Not much in the way of situational awareness and avoidance just mainly lethal weapons.
It's just ridicufunny how Phil flashes powertotems™ but completely crumbles from just having internet talk with someone from his past.

photo.php
 
Last edited:
Dain Bramage said:
I know this may be off-topic, but I swear this cartoon made me think of Taters enough to wonder if the artist may have heard of him.
10321471_704058579681642_7163286583558888171_o.jpg
Click to expand...

Possibly, though my guess is it shows just how pedestrian Phil really is. There are probably hundreds of trans-gendered/racial/species special unique snowflakes with head mates and self-diagnosed autism on Tumblr... And most of them are just fat white kids from the suburbs. Just like Phil. Just dye your hair pink and wear a t-shirt with a slogan on it and you can be an androgynous, non-binary, genderfluid trans-panda with gluten allergies too!
 
13335935_102113370212195_8355608986367217837_n.jpg


My big concern with Phils shitty knife is that heprobably learnshis technique from trannyganda posters and the taxpayers are going to have to pay for the hand surgery
 
Prince Omicron said:
13335935_102113370212195_8355608986367217837_n.jpg


My big concern with Phils shitty knife is that heprobably learnshis technique from trannyganda posters and the taxpayers are going to have to pay for the hand surgery
Click to expand...

ToroidalBoat said:
Who holds a knife like that?
Click to expand...

People that are hopelessly broken. Anyone who can't understand that you shouldn't grip a knife by the blade can't possibly know themselves, so of course they treat an intrusive thought as a different personality, or their reluctance to grunt and spit to mean they're actually women deep down inside.

I vaguely remember Phil posting why he gets tugboat. I think it had something about trauma being one factor, and an autism spectrum disorder related factor being another.
Click to expand...

Phil's ASD was definitely cited. Whatever it is Phil actually has, he sure as shooting needs welfare, and adult supervision for the foreseeable future. Phil's degeneration from life with his mother and the job at Wawa to a life with no direct supervision proves he isn't capable of taking care of himself.
 
Last edited:
Morbid Boredom said:
People that are hopelessly broken. Anyone who can't understand that you shouldn't grip a knife by the blade can't possibly know themselves, so of course they treat an intrusive thought as a different personality, or their reluctance to grunt and spit to mean they're actually women deep down inside.



Phil's ASD was definitely cited. Whatever it is Phil actually has, he sure as shooting needs welfare, and adult supervision for the foreseeable future. Phil's degeneration from life with his mother and the job at Wawa to a life with no direct supervision proves he isn't capable of taking care of himself.
Click to expand...

Here's all the text that was visible on what Phil posted, noting that he left out certain parts.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

After careful consideration of the entire record, I make the following findings:

1. The claimant’s date last insured is December 31, 2014.

2. There is no evidence of substantial gainful activity since August 31, 2010, the alleged onset date (20 CFR 404.1520(b), 404.1571 et seq., 416.920(b) and 416.971 et seq.).

There is no evidence that the claimant has engaged in substantial gainful activity at any time relevant to her applications for benefits (see, Exhibits 3D-8D, 10D-12D, 2E & 3E and hearing testimony). Therefore, a finding of disability is not precluded on the basis of work activity.

3. The claimant has the following severe impairments: a depressive disorder, an anxiety disorder, and a personality disorder (20 CFR 404.1520(c) and 416.920(c)).

The claimant has alleged disability on the basis of autism/Asperger’s syndrome, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a generalized anxiety disorder, a dissociative disorder, a personality disorder and fibromyalgia. She reported that her symptoms include suicidal ideation, difficulty interacting with others, difficulty sleeping, memory problems and impaired concentration. As a result of her symptoms, the claimant has become homeless and has difficulty performing tasks, including personal care. The claimant also testified that she is transgender woman who is transitioning from a man (see, Exhibits ?E, 6E, 10E, 11E & 15E and hearing testimony).

As will be discussed below, the findings reported in the claimant’s medical records indicate that the above impairments have more than a minimal effect on her ability to work. I therefore find that the claimant’s impairments are “severe.”

4. The severity of the claimant’s impairments meets the criteria of Section 12.06 of the Listing of Impairments found at 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 (20 CFR 404.1520(d), 404.1525, 416.920(d) and 416.925).

According to the claimant’s medical records, she legally changed her name after determining that she wanted to transition from male to female and was placed on a hormone regimen by her physician in May 2020 (Exhibit 1F/36). Thereafter, during a subsequent visit to the Mazzoni Center in June 2011, the claimant requested a referral for psychiatric treatment as she was

[. . .]

August 2013, she presented to the emergency room shortly thereafter, with suicidal ideation. Her emergency room physician suggested that the claimant’s current symptoms may have been precipitated by the new medication and her medication was stopped (Exhibit 13F/4).

At the hearing, the medical expert testified that he had reviewed the record, including the evidence of persistent depression, uncontrolled with psychotropic medication, and of a personality disorder, with difficulty functioning on a day-to-day basis. Dr. Tanenhaus specifically noted that the record describes a sleep disturbance, psychomotor agitation, feelings of worthlessness and difficulty concentrating, as contemplated under the “paragraph A” criteria of Section 12.04. He further testified that the record describes evidence of persistent disturbances of mood or affect and intense and unstable interpersonal relationships, as contemplated under the “paragraph B” criteria of both Section 12.04 and Section 12.08. In addition, in Dr. Tanenhaus’ opinion, the “paragraph B” criteria of both Section 12.04 and Section 12.08 are satisfied because the record indicates that the claimant’s impairments cause a mild restriction in activities of daily living, marked difficulties in maintaining social functioning, marked difficulties in maintaining concentration, persistence or pace, and no episodes of decompensation of extended duration.

I accept his testimony and accord it great weight, as it was based upon a review of the record in its entirety and is supported by the underlying medical evidence of record. Taking into consideration the opinion of the medical expert and the record as a whole, I find that the claimant suffers from a Listing level affective disorder that meets the criteria of Section 12.04 and from a Listing level personality disorder that meets the criteria of Section 12.08.

In making these findings, I have also considered other opinion evidence in accordance with the requirements of 20 CFR 404.1527 and 416.927 and SSRs 96-2p, 96-6p and 06-3p. I give some

[. . .]

I have also considered all symptoms and the [. . .] consistent with the objective medical evidence and other evidence, based on the [. . .] 20 CFR 404.1529 and 416.929 and SSRs 96-4p and 96-7p. After considering the evidence of record, I find that the claimant’s medically determinable impairments could reasonably be expected to produce the alleged symptoms, and that the claimant’s statements concerning the intensity, persistence and limiting effects of these symptoms are generally credible.

5. The claimant has been under a disability as defined in the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010, the alleged onset date of disability (20 CFR 404.1520(d) and 416.920(d)).

DECISION

Based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits filed on June 27, 2011, the claimant has been disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010.

Based on the application for supplemental security income protectively filed on February 16, 2013, the claimant has been disabled under section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010.

The component of the Social Security Administration responsible for authorizing supplemental security income will advise the claimant regarding the nondisability requirements for these payments and, if the claimant is eligible, the amount and the months for which payment will be made.

Medical improvement is expected with appropriate treatment. Consequently, a continuing disability review is recommended in 24 months.

/sneed/

Richard P. Laverdure
Administrative Law Judge

November 10, 2014
Date
 
AnOminous said:
Here's all the text that was visible on what Phil posted, noting that he left out certain parts.
Click to expand...

really nice detail work

well that pretty much invalidates Phil's reasoning here about losing his job

I like that Phil bases his pro-collectivist on personal, individual optimization (Pareto strong)...kinda antithetical there Phil.
So it's really more whatever system I can game the best.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom