🤝 Community Quiverfull Movement Lolcows - Starring the Duggars

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Verxis said:
I think you should, otherwise you're talking bullshit. In antiquity, People didn't care about age. Women were married off as early as 9 or 10. If you're going to be morally outraged, you should at least 'try' to be correct.
Click to expand...
This... isn't true. Marriage at a very young age was rare and done for political reasons. Most women were married by 19 or 20, and most men by 20 to 25.
 
Techpriest said:
This... isn't true. Marriage at a very young age was rare and done for political reasons. Most women were married by 19 or 20, and most men by 20 to 25.
Click to expand...

MAJORITY - JewishEncyclopedia.com

Complete contents the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia.
www.jewishencyclopedia.com www.jewishencyclopedia.com
Jews did it early.
In Shariah law there is no age limitations for marriage.
link.springer.com

Demographic systems in historic China: Some new findings from recent research - Journal of Population Research

Up to the 1980s, studies of Chinese population history were largely confined to the examination of aggregate population figures collected at national or provincial levels. Since then, however, investigations into Chinese demographic history have entered a new stage. There has been an increasing...
link.springer.com link.springer.com
Chinese loved marrying some kids.
theconversation.com

Children aren't starting puberty younger, medieval skeletons reveal

The panic about British children reaching puberty younger is unwarranted. Medieval skeletons provide a different answer.
theconversation.com theconversation.com
Before industrial development, children were married and marriages were consummated at the onset of puberty, which would be at average, 12.

MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
You do know that Josh Duggar has already been found guilty right?
Click to expand...
Okay, so a moralfag judge said guilty. But is he actually guilty?
Bunny Tracks said:
The trial's over, dumbass. He's already been found guilty.
Click to expand...
I am aware, but supposedly, the dudes that shot Armed Robbery were also found "guilty." Evidence?
 
The Dillards made a statement. Someone else archive pls bc the site keeps going down for me. Basically, verdict good, Josh bad, pray for Anna and kids.

www.dillardfamily.com

Dillard Family Statement On Josh Duggar Verdict Today - The Dillard Family

Today was difficult for our family. Our hearts go out to the victims of child abuse or any kind of exploitation. We are thankful for the hard work of law enforcement, including investigators, forensic analysts, prosecutors, and all others involved who save kids and hold accountable those...
www.dillardfamily.com www.dillardfamily.com
 
Verxis said:
Even worse. Why would I trust a moralfag jury that made their minds up once they discovered the alleged nature of the supposed crime. Fuck Josh. I'm glad he's going to prison, but I still don't think he did it.
Click to expand...
Nigga, he had CP all over his laptop under passwords that he himself used. He did it.
Red Mask said:
Please tell me you’re being sarcastic.
Click to expand...
He's a pedo. Prove me wrong.
 
Verxis said:

MAJORITY - JewishEncyclopedia.com

Complete contents the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia.
www.jewishencyclopedia.com www.jewishencyclopedia.com
Jews did it early.
In Shariah law there is no age limitations for marriage.
link.springer.com

Demographic systems in historic China: Some new findings from recent research - Journal of Population Research

Up to the 1980s, studies of Chinese population history were largely confined to the examination of aggregate population figures collected at national or provincial levels. Since then, however, investigations into Chinese demographic history have entered a new stage. There has been an increasing...
link.springer.com link.springer.com
Chinese loved marrying some kids.
theconversation.com

Children aren't starting puberty younger, medieval skeletons reveal

The panic about British children reaching puberty younger is unwarranted. Medieval skeletons provide a different answer.
theconversation.com theconversation.com
Before industrial development, children were married and marriages were consummated at the onset of puberty, which would be at average, 12.
Click to expand...
Kikes and chinks aren't exactly the best sources for healthy childhood development.
 
Jaded Optimist said:
40 years total, 20 years for both charges that he was found guilty for.
Click to expand...
Actually, the maximum is 20 years. He was charged with two counts- Count A (lesser) and Count B (greater). Count B actually encompasses Count A. So, when the jury ruled "guilty" on Count B, Count A became irrelevant. Thus, he has a minimum, mandatory 5 years, and a maximum of 20 years (pending any additional circumstances that influence sentencing).
Albert Ball said:
There is a lot of ass-mad kiwis in this thread. Chill the fuck out..... everyone agrees he is a pedo.
One thing I'm curious about is how much his wife Anna knew about his behavior. Besides the past Ashley Madison incident, she had to know he was a sexual deviant. There is no way his perversions didn't migrate into the marital bed as well. I think that is why she was so stoic once the verdict was read.
Click to expand...
What we know, based on Anna's own statements, is that she was told about Josh's "childhood mistakes". Now...what the fuck does that actually mean? My understanding is that she was told, verbatim, that "Josh had a little trouble with improper touching and was really curious about the opposite sex." That's a whole helluva lot different than, "Josh finger-raped his five year old sister while he read her a bible story and penned another sister against a washing machine to finger her ass". (The first is from Holt's testimony. The second is from the CPS report in 2006) So, as for his sisters....I'd argue she was pretty gas lit. She only knew what Jim Bob and her father told her. And, since her dad worked with prisoners, I'm not really surprised she was asked to take on someone with damage.... it was their family ministry and Josh was seen as an extension of that ministry.

When Ashley Madison broke and the woman came forward with her lawsuit (in which, let's not forget, she described Josh throwing her around and forcing her to perform "violent oral sex"), Anna was asked what she knew about Josh's prior allegations. She responded that Josh had told her "everything". But, did he? They (Anna and Josh) didn't work there shit out. Jim Bob had Josh make a public statement and then they sent him to an IBLP related "recovery center" near Chicago. The rules didn't really include confession to his wife or accountability or marriage counselling. It was just more manual labor, solitude, and church attendance. No qualified counsellors.

What's interesting, and why I think Anna found out something we still don't know about, is that Covenant Eyes was installed on Josh's shit in 2013 (per court testimony). I'm sorry... what? The inTouch story about his sisters didn't pop in mainstream media until 2015. The Ashley Madison shit was after that. THIS case was 2019. So...what did she know in 2013 or what happened in 2013? What was the catalyst that made her decide they needed to have that level of accountability with his online activities? Ironically, 2013 is when they moved to D.C. and he went to work for FRC.
I have a very difficult time believing that she didn't know what his kinks were. I think she probably suspected he was up to no good or caught him...but, what would she even do with that? Clearly, her family was rationalizing his behavior and telling her her job was to stay married no matter what.
 
Red Mask said:
Please tell me you’re being sarcastic.
Click to expand...
Think about it. Nobody has ever seen cp. We just take the government's word that it exists. Everyone that has supposedly seen it gets sent to prison and suspiciously dies. Curious, that.
Realistic Elephant said:
Kikes and chinks aren't exactly the best sources for healthy childhood development.
Click to expand...
It happened around the world. Those are just the most notable recent examples. It happened in America since the 18-1900s, and even in Europe. In some places in Europe, the Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is still 14-15.
 
Verxis said:
Think about it. Nobody has ever seen cp. We just take the government's word that it exists. Everyone that has supposedly seen it gets sent to prison and suspiciously dies. Curious, that.

It happened around the world. Those are just the most notable recent examples. It happened in America since the 18-1900s, and even in Europe. In some places in Europe, the Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is still 14-15.
Click to expand...
Lmao okay pedo
 
LogicBeetch said:
Actually, the maximum is 20 years. He was charged with two counts- Count A (lesser) and Count B (greater). Count B actually encompasses Count A. So, when the jury ruled "guilty" on Count B, Count A became irrelevant. Thus, he has a minimum, mandatory 5 years, and a maximum of 20 years (pending any additional circumstances that influence sentencing).

What we know, based on Anna's own statements, is that she was told about Josh's "childhood mistakes". Now...what the fuck does that actually mean? My understanding is that she was told, verbatim, that "Josh had a little trouble with improper touching and was really curious about the opposite sex." That's a whole helluva lot different than, "Josh finger-raped his five year old sister while he read her a bible story and penned another sister against a washing machine to finger her ass". (The first is from Holt's testimony. The second is from the CPS report in 2006) So, as for his sisters....I'd argue she was pretty gas lit. She only knew what Jim Bob and her father told her. And, since her dad worked with prisoners, I'm not really surprised she was asked to take on someone with damage.... it was their family ministry and Josh was seen as an extension of that ministry.

When Ashley Madison broke and the woman came forward with her lawsuit (in which, let's not forget, she described Josh throwing her around and forcing her to perform "violent oral sex"), Anna was asked what she knew about Josh's prior allegations. She responded that Josh had told her "everything". But, did he? They (Anna and Josh) didn't work there shit out. Jim Bob had Josh make a public statement and then they sent him to an IBLP related "recovery center" near Chicago. The rules didn't really include confession to his wife or accountability or marriage counselling. It was just more manual labor, solitude, and church attendance. No qualified counsellors.

What's interesting, and why I think Anna found out something we still don't know about, is that Covenant Eyes was installed on Josh's shit in 2013 (per court testimony). I'm sorry... what? The inTouch story about his sisters didn't pop in mainstream media until 2015. The Ashley Madison shit was after that. THIS case was 2019. So...what did she know in 2013 or what happened in 2013? What was the catalyst that made her decide they needed to have that level of accountability with his online activities? Ironically, 2013 is when they moved to D.C. and he went to work for FRC.
I have a very difficult time believing that she didn't know what his kinks were. I think she probably suspected he was up to no good or caught him...but, what would she even do with that? Clearly, her family was rationalizing his behavior and telling her her job was to stay married no matter what.
Click to expand...
Yeah. Something doesn't quite add up here. Why is Anna considered an accurate source? I'd say she's pretty biased. If anyone planted the evidence, I'd say it was her.
 
No boys for you to touch in prison now. Only men.
1639105231654.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom