- Joined
- Jul 6, 2021
"Duggard looked pale and clammy as U.S. Marshalls handcuffed him behind his back."
...so...he looked like he usually does, then?
Seriously, no one in that family has ever looked remotely healthy or hale.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Duggard looked pale and clammy as U.S. Marshalls handcuffed him behind his back."
I love the letter of St. James: "be doers of the Word, and not just hearers" (1:22), and "faith without works is dead" (2:20).I have the impression Jesus is less than thrilled with fake Christians, who pretty much make up 99% of all claiming to be.
Matthew 7:14 KJV: Because strait [is] the gate, and narrow [is] the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
He probably thought Daddy Jim Bob was getting him off.
Ok but what if a person doesnt want to get married? What if they're gay?In many cases, I dispute that religious conservatives think sexuality is evil in and of itself. They think it is good within the context of marriage (how do you think they got all those kids?) Heck, even the Catholic Church teaches that marriage is a sacrament; that is, when a husband and wife fulfill their wedding vows by banging, they receive divine grace.
Rather, I'd say Duggar-type fundies have a bad approach to it. Chastity is not necessarily prudishness, it's understanding that your sexuality is a gift from God and that you shouldn't misuse it. A Christian parent shouldn't be repressing their kids, but teaching them self-control.
Because, let's be honest: porn and having a coomer mentality also fucks up your brain. It's a major part of the reason fewer people are having sex and there's an increase in loneliness, inceldom, and troonery.
I don't know any Christians that are supporting this family. The ones I do know are looking to buy millstones.lol Christians are fucking retarded for defending this family, just a bunch of assholes.
I see you don't look at Facebook groupsI don't know any Christians that are supporting this family. The ones I do know are looking to buy millstones.
It's a rich person thing. His family immediately went into legal and PR damage control when the sister raping thing broke in 2015. They have money and influence. If money and influence can't outright buy justice, it can certainly delay it.I wouldn’t (and I’m sure I’m not alone) call the culture of covering this shit up Christian thing, though. Maybe just a fundie thing.
Uh oh. Now you've done it. You're gonna get people complaining about the fact we always mention big black cocks whenever this happens.19 Big Black Cocks and counting is awaiting him soon.
To be fair, most sane people don’t.I see you don't look at Facebook groups
oh 100%, im just tired of people acting like everyone hates him and there are no defenders.Usually people defending these types are cult fundies themselves.
I’m not surprised Facebook users would defend them to own the libs.I see you don't look at Facebook groups
No I disagree again, liberal cultures have this same problem, only it comes from passive neglect or aggressive defense, especially if the perp happens to be LGBTQ+. Though to be fair, many leftists want LGBTQ to have a P, & have advocated for pedo acceptance. The gay acceptance movement was plagued by pedos & trannies hanging onto their coattails and trying to synonymize themselves with gay people. Overall, the biggest open push for pedophile acceptance has come from the left in the last ten years. See: The Salon article, the Gay Men's Choir, Devon is Amazing, ect.Pedos do come from all walks of life, but let's not deny the fact that cultures, and places that are highly repressive, and highly conservative while also viewing all forms of sexuality as inherently evil, and women and children like chattel don't tend to have more of them.
I’m not surprised Facebook users would defend them to own the libs.
I didn't say liberal cultures didn't have this problem. I just said that highly conservative ones have a higher tendency of having it. I'd say the same thing for highly liberal ones, too, where there are no rules, or boundaries.No I disagree again, liberal cultures have this same problem, only it comes from passive neglect or aggressive defense, especially if the perp happens to be LGBTQ+. Though to be fair, many leftists want LGBTQ to have a P, & have advocated for pedo acceptance. The gay acceptance movement was plagued by pedos & trannies hanging onto their coattails and trying to synonymize themselves with gay people. Overall, the biggest open push for pedophile acceptance has come from the left in the last ten years. See: The Salon article, the Gay Men's Choir, Devon is Amazing, ect.
Pedos will infest anything they can worm into. It's really not a matter of ideology, it's a matter of what conveniences them the most.
> Owning the Libs
Pick one.
There's weirdos that will defend just about anyone. A tiny minority of people were defending Charles Manson up until they day he finally dropped dead in prison. The most common heard argument was that he wasn't actually at the Tate-Labianca house, and he's actually a wonderful humanitarian (or some shit)oh 100%, im just tired of people acting like everyone hates him and there are no defenders.
BasedGuilty!
View attachment 2786413
![]()
Verdict revealed in explosive Josh Duggar child pornography trial
JOSH Duggar has been found guilty on two child pornography charges and is being taken into custody. Duggar, 33, was arrested and charged with receiving and possessing child pornography in April 202…www.the-sun.com
No, not those sort of groups. But I won't associate with fundies.I see you don't look at Facebook groups
Is there even a way to verify this? This is like the first time in five years I've heard about a conservative in particular being a pedo, but I hear a lot of advocacy for it on the left consistently.I just said that highly conservative ones have a higher tendency of having it.
The one that Styx made was that Helter Skelter was actually a hoax and really just the name of a nightclub, that the killings were drug deals gone wrong & Charles' friends used him as a scapegoat for their own actions by insisting they were brainwashed. I never looked into it but it sounds realistic enough to cast doubt on the "serial killer cult" narrative.There's weirdos that will defend just about anyone. A tiny minority of people were defending Charles Manson up until they day he finally dropped dead in prison. The most common heard argument was that he wasn't actually at the Tate-Labianca house, and he's actually a wonderful humanitarian (or some shit)