US Queer As Volk - An article about Jack Murphy

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

Queer As Volk​

95903722-54CD-469D-AA9A-690AD3FD06C7.jpeg
Major craziness going on right now in a certain niche corner of the Right. Do you know who Jack Murphy is? I barely knew of him until I saw him pass by in the hallway at the National Conservatism conference recently. He’s a striking figure: very tall, bald, with a dramatic beard. Someone explained to me that he is a big figure in the manosphere, and fronts a hypermasculine philosophy that at one point included polygamy. Here is a link to his self-description on his website Jack Murphy Live. Excerpt:
CA2AD5E1-5D28-4BAC-A2A9-9494AFFD51EE.jpeg
I was wondering why Jack Murphy — real name is John Goldman — turned up at NatCon, but someone told me that he is a Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute. Someone else told me that they thought he had recently turned to Christianity, but weren’t sure. “Is he still a polygamist?” I asked. My interlocutor didn’t know.

Why is Jack Murphy in the news this week? In part because Lyndon McLeod, the far-right mass shooter in Denver who wrote novels under the name “Roman McClay,” was allegedly a member of Murphy’s private brotherhood called
E06A2207-C1B1-4159-93DC-7534C588B00C.jpeg
What’s this Liminal Order all about? I suspect we will be finding out soon.

Plus, a week or so ago, Murphy went on a chat show and was asked about an article he once wrote speaking of the pleasures of being a literal cuckold (he wrote about farming his girlfriend out to other men for sex). Jack Murphy did not appreciate the question (don’t click on this at work; he drops several f-bombs):
0580854F-BB95-4AC5-BAB3-2E4CC616A412.jpeg
It turns out that back in 2015, Murphy, who now sells himself and his masculinist advisory services as an extreme chad, wrote a piece extolling the erotic pleasure of being a beta cuck. You can find this online; I’m not going to link to it. Some Redditors got busy digging, and found that Murphy and his girlfriend had acted in a self-made porn broadcast back in 2019 (Murphy admitted this on Twitter today). In the film, there is apparently a sequence in which the super-masculine Murphy impales himself with a plastic phallus, while simultaneously pleasuring himself. This is not a rumor, alas; I stumbled across the image online, and can’t unsee it.

So we now see that a far-right public figure whose entire personality and business model was promoting himself as a villainous straight white male is … rather more ambiguous about his straightness and his masculinity than he would have us know.

The reader who tipped me off to all this says this passage from Theodor Adorno describes Murphy:
6052A98B-A858-41B2-AC74-B32ADEC9CB81.jpeg
At the root of their sadism is a lie, and only as liars do they truly become sadists, agents of repression. This lie, however, is nothing other than repressed homosexuality presenting itself as the only approved form of heterosexuality.

Murphy has a history of sadistic writing and messaging. In 2015, he informed his readers that “feminists need rape” to solve the “problem” of man’s “natural tendency towards dominance and women to passivity and submission.” And now there are images going around of his self-sodomization in a porn movie that he and his girlfriend did for money.

A decade ago, Johann Hari, the gay, left-wing British journalist, wrote an essay exploring the connection between homosexual men and fascism. It will be interesting to see how the Jack Murphy story plays out. Looks like one more piece of evidence for the Weimar America thesis.
 
Guys who think about this shit constantly, even if they have some points, are always weirdos. Just like feminists.
It's a funhouse mirror reflection.

People who so wear their identity on their sleeves, be it male, female, white, black, gay etc are weirdos.
 
I once read a book on Christian masculinity called Wild At Heart (author's name is John Eldredge), and my favorite quote from it is this:

A dude who is secure in his manhood lets his actions and life speak for itself. He doesn't need to go around bragging about how much of a poonslaying chad he is.

Like I say in my refutation of Bob Chipman, there are two kinds of people in this world: Doers and Talkers.

When I first read Return of Kings, I thought it was just a benign blog to help men improve themselves. But then I saw the articles titled "Why you should beat your wife and kids", "why we must give moar money to Lord Roosh or the hoes will win", and other such trash.

And then there's Jack Donovan, who claims being a fudgepacker is acktchually super manly.

The manosphere is a pack of lying con men that preys on losers and tryhards.
I feel like most of these guys literally just need to be told that being a man isn't some shit like drinking whiskey or smoking cigars, you do that because you like it or because you don't want to ruffle the feathers of the group. I know guys that work as tailors and bakers that are manlier than this Jew because they actually work and have passion for something beyond sex and how they are perceived.
 
Back
Top Bottom