Opinion Put Warning Labels on the Bible

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

Put Warning Labels on the Bible​

Warning labels cover every package of every product we purchase. A country singer has even crooned, “They ought to put warning labels on those sad country songs.” By definition a, warning label is a label attached to a product, or contained in a product’s instruction manual, warning the user about risks associated with its use. When I survey the ways the Bible has been used to hurt, demean, and dehumanize Others, while promoting the most disgusting kinds of exclusion, I’m tempted to believe that it’s time for warning labels on the Bible. “DON’T DO THAT WITH THE BIBLE.” This book is not intended as a weapon in the culture wars of the USA. The Bible is not an actual sword. This book should never be used to hurt, injure, maim, or kill anyone under any circumstance.

Keeping in mind, that Scripture was used to justify the crucifixion of Jesus, and, seeing as how we worship a crucified Lord, we, of all people, should oppose the misuse of the Bible to injure people.

Ever since I watched in dismay as then President Trump waved a Bible above his head outside the Episcopal Church in Washington, D. C., I have thought there ought to be warning labels on the holy book of the church. “Don’t do that with the Bible.”

Trump raised the Bible as if the book alone, in his hands, and turned upside down, by the way, was enough to justify the menacing mistreatment of protestors. The Bible used as a license to bully, abuse, and oppress free expression of American citizens screams “Unjust.”

That’s the theme: There ought to be warning labels on the Bible. All the side effects should be listed. The dangers of misusing the Bible should be delineated. Slap on the warming labels. Here is a suggested sample:
934ABC4F-CB16-4646-AAF0-6927D8C3535B.jpeg
Warning labels will benefit those readers who come to the Bible with the assumption that a book filled mostly with symbolic language is somehow literal. Warning labels will help prevent “proof texting.” Whenever the Bible gets hijacked to appear that it aligns with human prejudices, assumptions, and false beliefs, we are in trouble. Old Testament scholar Ellen Davis says, “Using the text to confirm our presuppositions is sinful; it is an act of resistance against God’s fresh speaking to us, an effective denial that the Bible is the living word of God.”

Nine Theses for Interpreting Scripture

In The Art of Reading Scripture, the story of a group of scholars involved in “The Scripture Project,” there are “Nine Theses on the Interpretation of Scripture.” Each thesis guards against using the Bible in dangerous and harmful ways.
  1. Scripture truthfully tells the story of God’s action of creating, judging and saving the world.
  2. Scripture is rightly understood in light of the church’s rule of faith as a coherent dramatic narrative.
  3. Faithful interpretation of Scripture requires an engagement with the entire narrative.
  4. Texts of Scripture do not have a single meaning limited to the intent of the original author.
  5. The four canonical gospels narrate the truth about Jesus.
  6. Faithful interpretation of Scripture invites and presupposes participation in the church.
  7. The saints of the church provide guidance in how to interpret and perform the Scripture.
  8. Christians need to read the Bible in dialogue with diverse others outside the church.
  9. Scripture calls the church to continually fresh rereadings of the text in light of the Holy Spirit’s ongoing work in the world.
“Don’t Do that to the Bible”

Following these guidelines for interpretating Scripture and being aware of the warning labels that attach to any reading of the Bible, I reached a series of conclusions.
  • The Bible is not an advocate or promoter of Christian Nationalism. Don’t do that with the Bible.
  • The Bible celebrates creation, but not creationism. Don’t do that with the Bible.
  • Rejecting women in ministry. Don’t do that with the Bible.
  • Denying climate change. Don’t do that with the Bible.
  • Denying evolution and science. Don’t do that with the Bible.
  • Building a wall to shut out immigrants. Don’t do that with the Bible.
  • Supporting a serial liar and indicted candidate. Don’t do that with the Bible.
  • The rapture. Don’t do that with the Bible.
  • America founded by God as a Christian nation. Don’t do that with the Bible.
  • Demonizing the LGTQ community. Don’t do that with the Bible.
There are many other advantages to read the Bible as a progressive. No Bible reader has to trapped in the literalist template as if there are no other ways to read the Bible.

A Prayer for Faithful Bible Reading

As the congregation I serve prays prior to the reading of the lectionary lessons for the day:

Almighty God, enable us to know that this is the Church’s Bible and it contains your guidance for our lives. Teach us again that the Bible tells the truth about God. Help us know that the four Gospels tell the truth about Jesus. As we read the Bible together as God’s people may God’s Word be a light to our path. With boldness, we sit under the authority of your word and will engage in the faithful interpretation of the Bible. We will gladly hear the Word with open minds and full hearts guided by the Holy Spirit. We commit to you that together we will hear and do the Word from God as a faithful and obedient people. Amen.
 
This is that "I don’t believe in your religion but use it to indoctrinate and brainwash into wokeism." meme personafied.
 
this book is not intended as a weapon in the culture wars of the USA. The Bible is not an actual sword. This book should never be used to hurt, injure, maim, or kill anyone under any circumstance.
:story: now do the Quran. Faggot.
 
Alternative title: How to tell people you repeatedly moved the Bible into the fiction section at Borders when you were 15.
 
Warning labels? Sure, those work just great until some idiot decides to ignore them, runs their Keurig off an overloaded outlet in the bathroom and burns the whole damn house down.

I don't even know how you could argue anything about climate change using the Bible and you'd have to be really retarded to use it in relation to the clearly nonreligious Trump. A big part of his appeal is he dropped the religious right horseshit from the Bush years and focused on the core issues that matter to people most - their bank accounts and good-paying jobs.
 
Ever since I watched in dismay as then President Trump waved a Bible above his head outside the Episcopal Church in Washington, D. C., I have thought there ought to be warning labels on the holy book of the church. “Don’t do that with the Bible.”
Why did Donald Trump go to that building in the first place? You seemed to gloss over that little detail, Mr. Journo-scum.
 
I wonder what kind of people would warn God not to speak to others.

Demonizing the LGTQ community. Don’t do that with the Bible.
No. We should continue to do this, with the Bible and without the Bible.

Why did Donald Trump go to that building in the first place? You seemed to gloss over that little detail, Mr. Journo-scum.
This one is not a mere journoroach, but had actual Theology training.
Fantasic4.png
 
Force Bibles back into public school and ban all forms of glorification or normalization of sexual degeneracy, especially of the LGBT variety.
 
This one is not a mere journoroach, but had actual Theology training.
View attachment 5251671
I thought so, he didn't say anything wrong and used certain terms only people who know theology and church governance use. You can definitely disagree with his politics but none of his "warnings" were in conflict with Christian beliefs.

However, creationism is considered a valid interpretation of Genesis in most if not all denominations, along with theistic evolution and intelligent design. It's just not really the best position due to some theological issues that stem from the way you have to work around clear scientific evidence to support it as opposed to the other two.

You could argue about what he means with the LGBTQ one but there are some nuances around the specific moral issues involved.
 
Warning : Faggots were harmed during the making of this book.

Trigger Warning : No bumsex

Privacy Warning : God is Watching
 
Where on the doll did the bible hurt you, you poor sod?

A photo of the illustrious author (ninja'd), no comment necessary.

progressivepersuasionandpassion_HS.jpg

Okay one comment, isn't gluttony one of the 7 mortal sins? Put down the fork you lardass. Its amazing that you spread globohomo but can't follow your own faith.
 
Sure, but only if you put one on the Torah as well, and add pictures to the Quran depicting people and places.
 
Rioters were btfo because the night before they had tried to burn down the church while rioting, then attacked the White House, and had continued to riot extremely violently around the White House and Lafayette Square Park the next day. Does the Bible justify stopping them? Jesus Himself said yes. Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. Communist fat fucks notwithstanding
 
Back
Top Bottom