RU Put nuclear weapons in Cuba – Russian MP

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

Put nuclear weapons in Cuba – Russian MP​

Russia should place its nuclear weapons in “friendly countries” near the US in response to Washington’s alleged plans to move its own tactical arms to Europe, lawmaker Aleksey Zhuravlev has suggested.

His comments came after The Telegraph reported on Saturday that the US is looking to deploy its nuclear weapons in the UK for the first time in 15 years, in order to counter a supposedly increased threat from Russia.

In a post on Telegram, Zhuravlev, who is first deputy chairman of the Russian parliamentary defense committee and leader of the Rodina (Motherland) party, pointed out that Britain has its own nuclear weapons, and that the US has already deployed part of its atomic arsenal to several European countries close to Russia.

“Therefore, it’s unlikely that additional deployment [of nuclear weapons to the UK] would have an effect on the military-political landscape,” Zhuravlev surmised.

Nevertheless, the politician suggested that Moscow should consider deploying its own nuclear weapons closer to the US and send them to “friendly countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua.”

Zhuravlev admitted, however, that weapons systems have made a big leap in the years since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. “Russian hypersonic missiles launched from our territory would reach the US faster than subsonic ones launched from the American underbelly,” the MP wrote.

He also pointed out that Russia has strategic aviation as well as a vast arsenal of submarines stationed in unknown locations around the world’s oceans.

“We have ways to respond to any encroachments by the US and NATO, which it controls,” Zhuravlev said.

The Russian Foreign Ministry has previously warned that Moscow would be forced to enact “compensatory countermeasures” in the event that American nuclear warheads return to Britain. Russia has also repeatedly accused the West of fueling tensions in Europe, and has cited NATO’s continued eastward expansion as one of the root causes of the Ukraine conflict.

Meanwhile, a number of Western officials – including from the UK, Germany, Estonia, and even the chair of NATO’s Military Committee – have stoked fears of a supposed Russian attack on Europe in the next few years, and have called on Western governments and citizens to prepare for a major conflict with Moscow.

Russia, however, has vehemently denied any plans to invade neighboring European countries, with Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov calling such claims a “hoax.” Russian President Vladimir Putin has also stressed that Moscow “has no interest… geopolitically, economically or militarily... in waging war against NATO” and would instead prefer to improve ties with the US-led bloc.
 
There's no such thing as a hypersonic missile.

The Russian do know it's not the 1960's anymore, right? They already tried this, and it failed.
 
Nevertheless, the politician suggested that Moscow should consider deploying its own nuclear weapons closer to the US and send them to “friendly countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua.”
These three friendly countries that all signed the UN treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons? What the heckerino bros, I thought being liberated by russki means you never have to be a massive superpower's bitch again, not like those bad Americans do it. What do you mean they'll have you play janny for their nukes that you voted to ban? Do you do it for free, too? What do you think happens if you refuse?
 
There's no such thing as a hypersonic missile.

The Russian do know it's not the 1960's anymore, right? They already tried this, and it failed.
Actually it succeeded. The reason the Russians took nukes out of Cuba was because of a diplomatic compromise we made to take nukes away from their own borders (I forget the country)
Still a dumb idea though.
 
Actually it succeeded. The reason the Russians took nukes out of Cuba was because of a diplomatic compromise we made to take nukes away from their own borders (I forget the country)
Still a dumb idea though.
It was mostly over Jupiter missiles in Turkey and Italy. In the end both sides more or less got what they wanted, the thing was that Kennedy agreed not to talk too much about the IRBM thing.
 
Actually it succeeded. The reason the Russians took nukes out of Cuba was because of a diplomatic compromise we made to take nukes away from their own borders (I forget the country)
Still a dumb idea though.
From what I remember the US agreed to remove some missiles close to the Soviet Union. The missiles were pretty much obsolete anyway or something like that. It was only done so Krushchev could save face and not look weak. He gave into the US, but the US agreed to remove their own missiles to help Krushchev out. In the end the Russians really didn't get anything. The Soviets backed down, but people pretended they didn't.
 
the US agreed to remove their own missiles to help Krushchev out.
And you believe all the missiles went back to the USSR, right? I'm 100% certain there are no nukes of any kind in Cuba and the USA didn't invade the island that sits just a mere 90 miles away on oil deposits because it was way easier to invade a place like Iraq halfway around the world even after the USSR was no more and Fidel Castro left this mortal coil shortly afterward.

Yes, I am sure JFK was just being a nice guy and wanted to help Nikita out. :story:
 
Last edited:
Pff, you are getting just a small portion of what russian "MP"s say daily. Like one of them said that demilitarization of Ukraine is the first step, the next is defaggization of Europe.
Don't listen to them, they are statists in Putin's theater.
 
From what I remember the US agreed to remove some missiles close to the Soviet Union. The missiles were pretty much obsolete anyway or something like that. It was only done so Krushchev could save face and not look weak. He gave into the US, but the US agreed to remove their own missiles to help Krushchev out. In the end the Russians really didn't get anything. The Soviets backed down, but people pretended they didn't.
Did you read this somewhere or do you just "know" this is what happened?

The USA stuck its latest and greatest Jupiter missiles in Turkey. To get missiles out of Cuban the US agreed to remove the missiles from Turkey in secret so the USA could save face.
 
And you believe all the missiles went back to the USSR, right? I'm 100% certain there are no nukes of any kind in Cuba and the USA didn't invade the island that sits just a mere 90 miles away on oil deposits because it was way easier to invade a place like Iraq halfway around the world even after the USSR was no more and Fidel Castro left this mortal coil shortly afterward.

Yes, I am sure JFK was just being a nice guy and wanted to help Nikita out. :story:
Holy shit this is fucking stupid. LOL
Always funny to see someone determined to spin any geopolitical event into "my side won and the other guy lost"
:story:
It's not spin when you are correct. Partially correct anyway.
Did you read this somewhere or do you just "know" this is what happened?

The USA stuck its latest and greatest Jupiter missiles in Turkey. To get missiles out of Cuban the US agreed to remove the missiles from Turkey in secret so the USA could save face.
I looked into the Cuban Missile Crisis again because I don't remember that much about it. I was wrong on the details. But I was still right. It wasn't that the missiles were obsolete. But they were going to be removed anyway. This fact was kept secret so the Soviets could save face for backing down.

 
I looked into the Cuban Missile Crisis again because I don't remember that much about it. I was wrong on the details. But I was still right. It wasn't that the missiles were obsolete. But they were going to be removed anyway. This fact was kept secret so the Soviets could save face for backing down.
This is cope.
This is american propaganda.

No wonder you people are fucked.
 
Ok vatnigger.
You people always follow the same playbook. You say something that belies a fundamentally poor understanding of history, then when called out you retreat to "my details were wrong but the point it correct". Now its just childish insults.

Are you actually bots? Or are you so far up your own ass that you can't see how this comes across?
 
You people always follow the same playbook. You say something that belies a fundamentally poor understanding of history, then when called out you retreat to "my details were wrong but the point it correct". Now its just childish insults.

Are you actually bots? Or are you so far up your own ass that you can't see how this comes across?
No, I'm pretty sure you're too stupid to understand when you're being mocked.

Abso-fucking-lutely.

lol now this is not only stupid but delusional; @Rei is Shit. is right, you're so far up your own ass you haven't a clue
Ok vatniggers.

LOL
 
Back
Top Bottom