Purity politics gets the left nowhere - The left contiues to eat its own.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Original (Archive)

Remember Jill Stein?

In case you’ve forgotten—since her name only resurfaces on schedule every four years—she’s the perennial Russian-backed Green Party candidate who materializes right on cue to trash Democrats, ostensibly from the left, then vanishes back into whatever bunker sustains her until the next presidential cycle.

Her 2024 campaign manager was Jason Call. In February 2025, this supposed leftist wrote that while Donald Trump was bad, “electing [Kamala] Harris would’ve been worse.”

Yes of course Trump is bad, there was no illusion that he would be terrible

Electing Harris would have been worse

We can fight Trump. Through mutual aid, through civil disobedience, through active resistance and organizing. We can overcome

We would never overcome the moral…

— Jason Call 🇵🇸 🇨🇩🇸🇩 (@CallForCongress) February 11, 2025

To Call, all of Trump’s evils—and the list is endless—were still preferable to the alleged “moral stain of re-electing genocide.” You can argue, quite easily, that Trump was objectively worse for Gaza given that Israeli warmongering Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu openly preferred him.

You can also ask why, if the vice president is apparently the all-powerful architect of Middle East policy, this crowd has spent approximately zero energy targeting Vice President JD Vance, Trump himself, Jared Kushner, or the rest of the cabal openly plotting ethnic cleansing.

“As godawful as Trump is, it was the better outcome,” Call concluded back in 2025. “Now, let’s organize to bury fascism (again, but this time for real and that means ending capitalism).”

And there it is. If you’re not trying to “end capitalism,” you are impure. That’s the test. They would rather hand power to a man they describe as a fascist—one who cages migrants, threatens cities, and openly admires authoritarians—than vote for Democrats who fail their revolutionary purity checklist. They believe if things get bad enough, that the American people will deliver a glorious communist revolution bringing about their dream utopia.

Has Call since reconsidered now that the “better outcome” is playing out in real time? On Thursday he posted this:

I just don’t know how we’re proceeding here when the president is a child rapist and murderer, virtually the entirety of Congress (and the prior administration) are unrepentant Zionists in support of genocide, and the party that is supposed to be an opposition to fascism does…

— Jason Call 🇵🇸 🇨🇩🇸🇩 (@CallForCongress) February 26, 2026

“I just don’t know how we’re proceeding here when the president is a child rapist and murderer, virtually the entirety of Congress (and the prior administration) are unrepentant Zionists in support of genocide, and the party that is supposed to be an opposition to fascism does nothing but enable fascism,” he wrote, conveniently forgetting his own role in kneecapping that opposition party. “When do we hit the brick wall that stops it all? We should have passed critical mass months ago.”

Harris is not a fascist. She is not a murderer. She is not a child rapist. If those distinctions matter—and they kinda do—then maybe, just maybe, things would not have been “worse” had Democrats won.

Maybe instead of painting almost the political spectrum with the blunt instrument of “Zionism,” it would be more honest to acknowledge that Democrats rightfully support Israel’s right to exist while also backing a two-state solution that gives Palestinians a state of their own—something Republicans have shown zero interest in pursuing.

Maybe stop wailing that Democrats aren’t fighting fascism hard enough when Republicans control the White House, Congress, and Supreme Court. Power matters. Who holds it matters.

You don’t get to declare Trump the “better outcome,” then complain that Democrats aren’t stopping him to your satisfaction.

If someone wants to vote single-issue, it’s a free country. Knock yourself out. But elections aren’t performance art. They decide who commands the Justice Department, who appoints judges, who runs the military, who writes regulations, who controls the levers of state power. As Trump shows, the winners can literally stand up their own private militia and invade American cities. They can turn the world inside out, threatening to invade allies like Canada and Greenland.

You might not get your mythical candidate who snaps their fingers and ends capitalism. But you also might avoid handing unfettered control to an actual authoritarian.

This isn’t complicated.
 
We've been telling them this since 2016, and they still haven't learned.

Even in a piece they were trying to be measured and appealing with? (otherwise why even concede the left has a problem?) They can't do it and call Trump a fascist and baby rapist...

And this is them behaving as best as they can.....

Even when they try? They can not keep their sneering sense of superiority and frustration at not running the world come right to the surface.

The left has a purity problem because they honestly and truly do think? Deep down inside? That they ARE pure and that entitles them to disenfranchise the impure.....
 
Last edited:
MLs vote against their own best interests, news at 9
 
The left has a purity problem because they honestly and truly do think? Deep down inside? That they ARE pure and that entitles them to disenfranchise the impure.....
This is completely backward. "The left" (libs) don't have a purity problem, they're welcoming and defending every single degenerate and crime, doesn't matter how heinous, doesn't matter how big a PR problem, libs protect their own. Libs see a horrortroon rapist and immediately go "no misgendering".

"The right" has a purity problem, Charlie Kirk was murdered and they immediately started infighting because they're brownoid and redneck homosexuals jostling for status, it's their default mode of operation.
 
This is completely backward. "The left" (libs) don't have a purity problem, they're welcoming and defending every single degenerate and crime, doesn't matter how heinous, doesn't matter how big a PR problem, libs protect their own. Libs see a horrortroon rapist and immediately go "no misgendering".

"The right" has a purity problem, Charlie Kirk was murdered and they immediately started infighting because they're brownoid and redneck homosexuals jostling for status, it's their default mode of operation.

The "welcoming and defending" part of leftism is just the facade though. You will be stabbed in the back the moment someone realizes they can increase their clout or income by doing so. Allow me to explain:

There was a time, from about 2018 to 2022-ish, that all available online streaming platforms were populated by a small army of leftist content creators or streamers, especially Twitch. It was easy to get into, and if you made blanket statements about rejecting anything Trump does or said, or did reaction streams covering Sam Seder and talking about how based he is, you could gain a following.

You'd think with that much visibility and reach, it would have advanced leftist ideology greatly in the mainstream zeitgeist. But alas... because leftism is the Purity Olympics, as soon as any groups or collaborations would form between streamers, they would begin tearing each other apart for anything that could be spun into an example of how the target was grifting or not really a true leftist.

You gave 15 more seconds of coverage or talking time to a white person than a PoC? Everyone else covering/reacting to some social injustice but YOU didn't? Did you not update your Twitter bio with [CURRENT THING]? DO YOU NOT EVEN HAVE A TRANS FLAG ON YOUR WALL BEHIND YOU??? OMG

All of these and more were catalysts for breadtube character assassinations. Nothing leftists like more than pointing out how another leftists isn't as leftists as THEY are and it's why the ideology continues to languish in grass roots with only minor incursions into mainstream politics in the US. Despite what is said around here, the vast majority of democrats are centrist liberals.

The "right", has only recently ran into the problem of being "MAGA" enough in appearance. Prior to Trumpism, the GOP were fuckin lock step with each other. While this enabled them to accomplish things, they were slow, weren't very nimble in messaging or adapting to changing environments, and is what left the party open to the populist takeover. But with that populism, yes. There comes its own purity testing of who is the most aligned with the current popluist interest.
 
You're assuming that the goal of woke politics is to win elections. It's not. It's to score points on Twitter for being the most woke.

Woke is violently opposed to anything resembling compromise, because woke exists in pure theory land where such purity is possible, and it reacts violently when exposed to the reality of politics.

1.png
2.png
 
You're assuming that the goal of woke politics is to win elections. It's not. It's to score points on Twitter for being the most woke.

Woke is violently opposed to anything resembling compromise, because woke exists in pure theory land where such purity is possible, and it reacts violently when exposed to the reality of politics.

View attachment 8646809
View attachment 8646810
They're not known for being too bright sometimes. These are the same people who helped torpedo Harris because, while she supported Palestine, she didn't support them ENOUGH. The result of that action was them getting to watch Trump and BiBi level Gaza instead.

Truly 4D Chess masters.
 
Being a leftist must be exhausting. It's a 24/7 battle royale except the winner gets the lead special by Marxist-Leninists.
One of my favorite memories of the last 10 years is reading shitlib poasts about having to go to fucking therapy because they're made so exhausted and miserable by their own "news" sources and political allies :story:
 
And there it is. If you’re not trying to “end capitalism,” you are impure. That’s the test. They would rather hand power to a man they describe as a fascist—one who cages migrants, threatens cities, and openly admires authoritarians—than vote for Democrats who fail their revolutionary purity checklist. They believe if things get bad enough, that the American people will deliver a glorious communist revolution bringing about their dream utopia.
The migrant "cage" thing existed under several presidents before Trump, he has "threatened" cities because liberal mayors, activist judges and leftist governors openly defy federal law enforcement trying to deport criminals and "openly admires authoritarians" not even worth addressing who gives a fuck.
 
Back
Top Bottom