Proof that Catholicism is true

  • Thread starter Thread starter MW 590
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Yes. I'm sure the Irish just made up their fifty odd years under a Catholic theocracy where having your spouse die was adequate reason to be incacerated for life in a laundry and your baby sold to rich Americans.

It's Satan and the Freemasons and the Gay Space Communism I'm sure.



Ironic that you call Hollywood a baby raping machine, considering that the Catholic Church controlled it for so long.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Legion_of_Decency



Muslims are cunts. Orthodox Judaism is cunty too.

Just because they are cunts, does not make you or your fellow cultists any less of a cunt either.



Love you too boo <3

That's like saying the ESRB controls video games. Hollywood has always been a bastion of jewry. Jewry has always gone hand in hand with blood ritual and child sacrifices.

Homosexuality is homosexuality. The gay virus spreads through child rape, even the most conservative liberal studies trying to isolate as many factors and have as many asterisks in their study as possible have found that child molestation increases the chance of being gay by as much as ten percent. If we drill down into the study and actually address the weaknesses that are present in any psychological study the inability to isolate variables, the inability to define certain variables, the inability to publish papers that go against established dogmas because there is no money, the complete lack of empiricism, we can assume the number is higher significantly. It's well known and has been written about by gay scholars that grooming is part of homosexuality. It's inseperable.

It's easy to focus on anything white or male instead of addressing the real problem. That's why Jews decided to make a pinata out of the Catholic Church and for the Right they gave them Muslims and hid in their Jewish shadows. Gays and Jews, typically one in the same are responsible for a majority of child rape. Not Catholicism
Jews have work around in their talmud to allow fucking if children because the goyim aren't human. Muslims are similar. Not the GOC the grand ol christ followers.
 
That's like saying the ESRB controls video games. Hollywood has always been a bastion of jewry. Jewry has always gone hand in hand with blood ritual and child sacrifices.

Homosexuality is homosexuality. The gay virus spreads through child rape, even the most conservative liberal studies trying to isolate as many factors and have as many asterisks in their study as possible have found that child molestation increases the chance of being gay by as much as ten percent. If we drill down into the study and actually address the weaknesses that are present in any psychological study the inability to isolate variables, the inability to define certain variables, the inability to publish papers that go against established dogmas because there is no money, the complete lack of empiricism, we can assume the number is higher significantly. It's well known and has been written about by gay scholars that grooming is part of homosexuality. It's inseperable.

It's easy to focus on anything white or male instead of addressing the real problem. That's why Jews decided to make a pinata out of the Catholic Church and for the Right they gave them Muslims and hid in their Jewish shadows. Gays and Jews, typically one in the same are responsible for a majority of child rape. Not Catholicism
Jews have work around in their talmud to allow fucking if children because the goyim aren't human. Muslims are similar. Not the GOC the grand ol christ followers.
Spouting /pol/ memes doesn't make them true. Produce specific citations for your claims.
EDIT: Shouting "THE JEWS AND FAGGOTS COVERED IT ALL UP" isn't proof.
 
Last edited:
That's like saying the ESRB controls video games. Hollywood has always been a bastion of jewry. Jewry has always gone hand in hand with blood ritual and child sacrifices.

Homosexuality is homosexuality. The gay virus spreads through child rape, even the most conservative liberal studies trying to isolate as many factors and have as many asterisks in their study as possible have found that child molestation increases the chance of being gay by as much as ten percent. If we drill down into the study and actually address the weaknesses that are present in any psychological study the inability to isolate variables, the inability to define certain variables, the inability to publish papers that go against established dogmas because there is no money, the complete lack of empiricism, we can assume the number is higher significantly. It's well known and has been written about by gay scholars that grooming is part of homosexuality. It's inseperable.

It's easy to focus on anything white or male instead of addressing the real problem. That's why Jews decided to make a pinata out of the Catholic Church and for the Right they gave them Muslims and hid in their Jewish shadows. Gays and Jews, typically one in the same are responsible for a majority of child rape. Not Catholicism
Jews have work around in their talmud to allow fucking if children because the goyim aren't human. Muslims are similar. Not the GOC the grand ol christ followers.
do you have any charts to prove that
 
The pope has the power of the grand magisterium when he makes interpretations of the Bible he is speaking as a divine messenger of Christ and can say no wrong. The Protestant religion has no objective interpretation. It is not so much the content or the exact words of the Bible that matter it is how they are interpreted.

I suggest you read Pius IX Syllabus of Errors, where amongst other things he declared democracy and freedom of religion to be heretical.

What a surprise, today the Pope does not consider voting to be heretical or a sin worthy of eternal damnation as it was for many Italians for decades after reunification.

If you'd like a less modern but more glaring example, google up Ursury and come back to me.

That's like saying the ESRB controls video games. Hollywood has always been a bastion of jewry. Jewry has always gone hand in hand with blood ritual and child sacrifices.

Most Jews today, even in Israel, are "Reform". That's basically a fancy way of saying Ethnically Jewish Atheists.

You may have not realised this, but Atheists aren't usually big into magic and worshipping nothing.

Homosexuality is homosexuality. The gay virus spreads through child rape,

Can someone put this as a random.txt, please?

even the most conservative liberal studies trying to isolate as many factors and have as many asterisks in their study as possible have found that child molestation increases the chance of being gay by as much as ten percent.

Would you please link me to this study you're talking about. Is it the Narf one?

If we drill down into the study and actually address the weaknesses that are present in any psychological study the inability to isolate variables, the inability to define certain variables,

Less word salad, please. Baffling with bullshit might be a Catholic go to, but keep it in English.
the inability to publish papers that go against established dogmas because there is no money,
There's plenty of money in contrarianism. See the Church Militant, Alex Jones etc.

the complete lack of empiricism, we can assume the number is higher significantly. It's well known and has been written about by gay scholars that grooming is part of homosexuality. It's inseparable.

The Catholic Medical Association itself alone is not all "gay scholars". And being gay does not guarantee you're the best qualified to speak about the mechanics of it anyway.

It's easy to focus on anything white or male instead of addressing the real problem. That's why Jews decided to make a pinata out of the Catholic Church and for the Right they gave them Muslims and hid in their Jewish shadows. Gays and Jews, typically one in the same are responsible for a majority of child rape. Not Catholicism

The race has nothing do to with this. No matter where in the world the Catholic Church has gone; Africa, Australia, America, Europe; we have a long and glorious history of sex abuse.

Even the fucking Synod of Elvira back in 305-306 AD had to fuck talk about priestly sexual abuse. It's not just the odd bad person, it has been institutionalised for more than a millennium and a half.
Jews have work around in their talmud to allow fucking if children because the goyim aren't human. Muslims are similar. Not the GOC the grand ol christ followers.

"I have not come to bring peace, but a sword"

Guess who said that about unbelievers?
 
@Fagatron make no mistake Judaism is indeed a race but that doesn't stop the blatant worship that Jews do of heretical demons from the old testament, baphomet, moloch, why are these always seen with Jews? One reason is Jews detest Jesus Christ. They are behind the church of Satan.

Funny you bring up Alex Jones, he used to talk about Israel's role in 9/11 he hasn't mentioned the Jews since. It's funny the people you've set up to be contrarian are really just Zionist cucks. You don't even realize that the figures that you believe to be on the outskirts were set up as fenceposts so you can't even consider the verboten ideas.
https://youtu.be/O3aBQNdqJO4
 
@Fagatron make no mistake Judaism is indeed a race but that doesn't stop the blatant worship that Jews do of heretical demons from the old testament, baphomet, moloch, why are these always seen with Jews? One reason is Jews detest Jesus Christ. They are behind the church of Satan.

Which part of modern Orthodox/Conservative Jews being monotheists did you miss?

Baphomet isn't in the Old Testament, it's a mistranslation of Muhammad. Moloch was a deity of a foreign people. Even when the Jews were polytheists before the Babylonian Captivity, Yahwists still pushed them to shun the worship of the rest of the Caananite Pantheon like Baal and Ashera.
Funny you bring up Alex Jones, he used to talk about Israel's role in 9/11 he hasn't mentioned the Jews since.

Has he had a reason to bring up Jews since? Not all right wingers feel a need to shriek about religion.
It's funny the people you've set up to be contrarian are really just Zionist cucks.

How is the Church Militant a zionist cuck? They were among the ones pushing for the reinstatement of the Good Friday prayers for the conversion of the "Impudent Jews" mainstream Catholicism condemned.

You don't even realize that the figures that you believe to be on the outskirts were set up as fenceposts so you can't even consider the verboten ideas.
https://youtu.be/O3aBQNdqJO4

Don't just wear a tin foil hat, work it baby. Give it some sass.
 
@Fagatron make no mistake Judaism is indeed a race but that doesn't stop the blatant worship that Jews do of heretical demons from the old testament, baphomet, moloch, why are these always seen with Jews? One reason is Jews detest Jesus Christ. They are behind the church of Satan.

Funny you bring up Alex Jones, he used to talk about Israel's role in 9/11 he hasn't mentioned the Jews since. It's funny the people you've set up to be contrarian are really just Zionist cucks. You don't even realize that the figures that you believe to be on the outskirts were set up as fenceposts so you can't even consider the verboten ideas.
https://youtu.be/O3aBQNdqJO4
are jews the reason why you can't get laid
 
Which part of modern Orthodox/Conservative Jews being monotheists did you miss?

Baphomet isn't in the Old Testament, it's a mistranslation of Muhammad. Moloch was a deity of a foreign people. Even when the Jews were polytheists before the Babylonian Captivity, Yahwists still pushed them to shun the worship of the rest of the Caananite Pantheon like Baal and Ashera.


Has he had a reason to bring up Jews since? Not all right wingers feel a need to shriek about religion.


How is the Church Militant a zionist cuck? They were among the ones pushing for the reinstatement of the Good Friday prayers for the conversion of the "Impudent Jews" mainstream Catholicism condemned.



Don't just wear a tin foil hat, work it baby. Give it some sass.
The Jewish god is Judaism, they can lie steal cheat kill rape etc so long as it's for the good of the Jews . To call it a religion is laughable, it's completely amorphous in it's beliefs so long as it benefits Judaism anything is forgiven how do you think these orthodox rabbis got herpes in the first place. Prostitution. Jews drink children's blood and worship baphomet because they believe it will increase their power, their life span etc. The talmud forgives all because the spoken word of God passed down by the tradition is that goyim are nothing more than cattle, the Jewish goyim converts are no more than goyim slaves.

Yeah the Catholic Church has fucked boys throughout time, but the hyper focus is brought on by a magnifying glass shaped like a yamulke.
 
The Jewish god is Judaism, they can lie steal cheat kill rape etc so long as it's for the good of the Jews . To call it a religion is laughable, it's completely amorphous in it's beliefs so long as it benefits Judaism anything is forgiven how do you think these orthodox rabbis got herpes in the first place.

Judaism is defined by Orthopraxy rather than Orthodoxy. Belief in "right doctrine" is something unique to Christianity and Islam. The Hasidic sects adopted it later in the 18th centuries, but for the vast majority of Jews, the idea you can be condemned for not all sharing the same scholarly opinion is totally alien.

Perhaps this is helped by a more cohesive social identity alongside racial unity.

Prostitution. Jews drink children's blood and worship baphomet because they believe it will increase their power, their life span etc. The talmud forgives all because the spoken word of God passed down by the tradition is that goyim are nothing more than cattle, the Jewish goyim converts are no more than goyim slaves.

Uh. Did we read the same Talmud? I know they accused Jesus of being a fraud who was hanged but the first mention "Baphomet" gets is by Catholics in reference to the Knights Templars in the 11th century. Baphomet has no link to Judaism at all.

Yeah the Catholic Church has fucked boys throughout time, but the hyper focus is brought on by a magnifying glass shaped like a yamulke.

The core difference being Jews claim to be a light unto the nations and the most beloved of their deity in their own land, for most of history they have not been the largest corporation the Earth has ever known claiming absolute divine authority from God to rule the entire world spiritually who can and will consign you to eternal damnation for even looking at his avatar on earth funny.

Jews have done some strange things, but they've never had the global cover ups as Catholics have orchestrated.

The very earliest exposes on Catholicism such as that by the Boston papers weren't done by Jews, they were done by Catholics. As Catholics were the victims, and Catholics who continue to come forward.
 
Mr. Jacob Harrison, have you considered trying to convert some of the uncontacted tribes in the world who will never have a chance to hear the gospel like the Sentinelese?

God would surely reward you if you could finish what the last missionary who tried to visit and convert them didn't finish.

Death of John Allen Chau ( 2018 )

In November 2018, John Allen Chau, a 26-year-old American missionary trained and sent by Missouri-based missionary organization All Nations, travelled illegally to North Sentinel Island by paying local fishermen, intending to make contact with and live among the Sentinelese in the hope of converting them to Christianity.

...

On his final visit, on 17 November, Chau instructed the fishermen to leave without him. The fishermen later saw the islanders dragging Chau's body, and the next day they saw his body on the shore.

Or perhaps you could visit North Korea and spread the gospel like missionary Kenneth Bae, with God on your side I'm sure nothing could go wrong.

_72402279_72400605.jpg
 
Last edited:
Priests get a bad rep (in my experience growing up catholic, a lot of them were genuinely great guys as angry about all the bad shit as anyone), but child abuse is a real issue in the church you can't just scapegoat away. I think the problem is a lot of catholic families send their misfit, deviant sons to the monastery in hopes they'll shape up. Sounds like a good idea in theory but if you think about it a minute, you'll realize that's probably the last place the black sheep of a community should be.
 
Judaism is defined by Orthopraxy rather than Orthodoxy. Belief in "right doctrine" is something unique to Christianity and Islam. The Hasidic sects adopted it later in the 18th centuries, but for the vast majority of Jews, the idea you can be condemned for not all sharing the same scholarly opinion is totally alien.

Perhaps this is helped by a more cohesive social identity alongside racial unity.



Uh. Did we read the same Talmud? I know they accused Jesus of being a fraud who was hanged but the first mention "Baphomet" gets is by Catholics in reference to the Knights Templars in the 11th century. Baphomet has no link to Judaism at all.



The core difference being Jews claim to be a light unto the nations and the most beloved of their deity in their own land, for most of history they have not been the largest corporation the Earth has ever known claiming absolute divine authority from God to rule the entire world spiritually who can and will consign you to eternal damnation for even looking at his avatar on earth funny.

Jews have done some strange things, but they've never had the global cover ups as Catholics have orchestrated.

The very earliest exposes on Catholicism such as that by the Boston papers weren't done by Jews, they were done by Catholics. As Catholics were the victims, and Catholics who continue to come forward.
@Bleachedanoos is incapable of communicating except in angry /pol/ack ranting. He unironically views 4chan circa 2014 as the pinnacle of human civilization, and views "are you jewish BTW" as an unassailable logical deathblow. He is one of the few people on this site I'd say don't really merit anything above a shitpost in response to his angry tantrums.
 
That site I linked covers both Protestant and Catholic interpretations of the bible, and you have selected the heretical portion. If you'd like the most recent commentary by the U.S Bishops you may find it here, and they affirm it is a non-literal statement upon the Davidic Kingship. http://www.usccb.org/bible/isaiah/11

Your beloved Catholic Answers likewise states that there is no, in their words, "Doggie Heaven" https://www.catholic.com/qa/do-animals-have-souls-like-human-beings.

Animals do not have immortal souls according to Catholic Tradition, they have material souls bound to their flesh that perishes upon death. This is in-keeping with ancient Jewish thought on the matter, however they went a step further and denied a human afterlife as well.

Being made in the image of God means just that, being made the closest to God. Older theologians would describe this in terms of sapience, but more modern ones shy away from it as it becomes more readily apparent animals actually do retain memories and display emotions.

This is why Catholicism does not recognise a concept of animal rights. Even in Laudato Si, a document by Francis affirming John Paul II's opinions on Environmentalism and Stewardship the Catholic Church affirms it is acceptable to use and experiment on animals. If they had an eternal aspect, this would not be allowed.

Catholicism is not a buffet Jacob, it's a set course meal.
The US Bishops commentary is heretical because they are using the New American Bible and not the Douay-Rheims Bible which is the true version of the bible as it is a direct translation of the Latin Vulgate. Them using the wrong bible demonstrates the heresy in the church after Vatican 2.

While I often use Catholic Answers as a source, there are many things I disagree with since they promote the Vatican 2 doctrine. I am a bigger fan of The Remnant which is a traditionalist Catholic site.
The Douay-Rheims is but one acceptable translation, and not the only one endorsed by the Catholic Church. As an American, you are obligated to obey the decrees and guidance of the Americans Bishops council on matters of discipline. As they have declared the NAB acceptable, which they themselves had a big hand in producing, it cannot be heresy.

The Douay-Rheims is in fact the total opposite from a Vulgate translation, it was a response during the reformation against critique from the Reformists. Jeromes' Vulgate was a frankly awful translation fettered with errors, and the Catholics rather than reccomend Reform works, produced their own version of scriptures from Greek texts.

It's unfair to a degree to levy too much critique against the vulgate, because the producers of the Douay-Rheims and Reform versions had access to many original greek texts earlier translators did not. That said, scholars within the Catholic Church were already long aware prior to the Reformation that the Vulgate was not entirely accurate. It wasn't until the fall of Constantinople and the surge of Greek speakers from there into Western Europe (especially Italy) that the Catholic church was once again able to reaccess classical literature it had lost the capacity to read and copies of texts brought from the east it was not aware existed.
The Catholic Church accepted the New American Bible after Vatican II. It goes against the Council of Trent which declared that only the Latin Vulgate could be used as a bible. And speaking of the Latin Vulgate, an incident in 1592 regarding the translation of the Latin Vulgate proves that Catholicism is true because it proves the doctrine of Papal Infallibility. Pope Sixtus V died before he could teach error.

Sixtus V reigned as pope from 1585-1590. He has been described as a "brilliant leader in political and ecclesiastical arenas, a tireless innovator in agriculture, engineering and law, he effectively enacted and enforced laws, created an impressive aqueduct system, reformed clergy and the Church’s liturgical customs, tackled building projects, drained the swamps near Rome to eliminate the siege of malaria, spent large amounts of money on charitable works and missions, and oversaw the completion of the St. Peter’s Basilica." Unfortunately he had an ego to match and this got him into serious trouble when a revision of the Latin Vulgate edition of the holy Bible was begun. "Historian Francis Gasquet explains the background of the Vulgate: ‘The Latin text of the Sacred Scriptures had existed from the earliest times of Christianity.’ The translators were unknown to St. Augustine and St. Jerome; but the former says that the old Latin version had certainly come ‘from the first days of the Faith’, and the latter that it ‘ had helped strengthen the Faith of the infant Church.’ Made and copied without any official supervision these western texts soon became corrupt or doubtful."

Since the Church was much threatened by Protestant doctrines that were fast appearing throughout much of Europe and since there were numerous editions of the Vulgate in circulation, Pope Sixtus recognized that the Church required best biblical translation possible to meet Protestant arguments. He acted forthrightly in assembling a team of scholars and linguists, headed by eminent theologians like Cardinal Robert Bellarmine and others. They compiled as many Greek manuscripts as could be assembled and finished the revision process by the end of 1588. But apparently overcome by pride, the pope found the ten thousand readings they had diligently chosen inadequate, and angrily announced he would personally revise the Vulgate. He declared, ‘We, weighing the importance of the matter, and considering carefully the great and singular privilege we hold of God, and our true and legitimate succession from Blessed Peter, Prince of the Apostles . . . Are the proper and specially constituted Person to decide this whole question."

Ill equipped for the task, Sixtus eliminated all the work done by the former commission, and started fresh. Unfortunately his abilities to translate, edit and make all the appropriate decisions were beyond his capabilities and the result was an error filled translation presented to the cardinals in early 1590.

Cardinal Bellarmine and Fr. Toledo, another Jesuit scholar revealed their fears "…that by such mutilation he [Sixtus] was laying himself open to the attacks of the heretics, and was giving more serious scandal to the faithful than anything else the pope could do . . . " If Sixtus had formally promulgated this distorted version, it would have allowed a strong case to be argued against the doctrine of papal infallibility since the Pope would have fulfilled the three requirements layed out by Vatican I for an infallible teaching. But the weight of opposition was sufficient, thanks to Bellarmine and others, to stope the Pope from releasing it. Still, he worked on correction of typographical errors with the apparent intention of releasing a corrected version soon. Patrick Madrid writes, "Expectation was at a boiling point. The news in Rome had it that the official promulgation would happen any day. Advance copies of the new Vulgate had been bound and delivered to all the cardinals in Rome along with advance copies of the bull officially publishing it. Everything was ready for the pope to promulgate the new version. Nothing could stop him." But at the last moment Sixtus, whose health and vigor were never questioned, took to his bed, dying on August 27, 1590 after a brief illness. The Holy Spirit's promise to guide the Church to all truth seems to have been fulfilled again. "Only God knows if Sixtus’ sudden death was dramatic proof of divine intervention-- the evidence that papal infallibility isn’t just a Catholic idea, but that God Himself will prevent, by death if necessary, the pope from teaching an error formally to the Church." (Madrid, pps. 242-51, Pope Fiction).

Catholic Answers is an officialy endorsed apostolate of the Catholic Church, the Remnant is not. Due to its support for the still-partially schismatic Society of Saint Pius X, it may be heretical. It certainly wouldn't gain a nihil obstat ot imprimatur from a mainstream bishop unlike Catholic Answers.
Wikipedia explains why The Remnant is called the remnant.

The name The Remnant is a reference to the remnant of Isaiah and the belief that only a remnant of Catholics holding to the traditional teachings and practice of the Church remain after the sweeping changes brought by the Second Vatican Council.

Therefore, the mainstream bishops are not holding to the traditional teachings and practices of the Church. And Benedict XVI(the best and most ultra conservative of the post Vatican II popes who was likely forced to resign) lifted the excommunications of the 4 bishops of the society and finally allowed for traditionalist churches to have the traditional Latin mass so the SSPX is no longer schismatic.
Why would God create an angel purely to lead his most loved creation into damnation? Why would God create a world in which it's possible to rape little girls? Why would God create a world in which people can eat each other? I know the only answer that makes logical sense, but you won't like it.
God did not intend for Satan to rebel against him, but at the same time he did not want to interfere with the free will of his angels so he allowed it to happen. Things would have been perfect for humans, but then Adam and Eve brought sin into the world, which is why there are sinners who commit crimes like rape. But God will make the world perfect again after he defeats Satan.
In any case, on the subject of animal souls if you're a Catholic Roma Locuta Est.
As I said, while many in the church have said that animals don't have souls, the church has never made it an infallible doctrine for the entire church, meaning that Catholics are allowed to believe that animals live eternally.
 
1. You have committed a first-order heresy against the Catholic Church and its doctrine by claiming visitation from spirits. The saints may appear in divine visions to relay messages from God, but the dead do not return to this world for any other reason. Ghosts are deceits by Satan and his angels to tempt mortals into witchcraft. If you are truly faithful, you would recant.
2. If a father is cruel and hateful to his child, ever punishing and torturing him, does the child still owe him love and obedience?
3. Everything regarding your statements RE: Purgatory would have been woefully outdated and in cases heretical 300 years ago. Your understanding of the Catholic faith is a shambol of various era's teachings and your own heretical beliefs meant to justify yourself. This is not your fault: it is the nature of the self to cling to things they desire, such as righteousness. But these things cannot truly satisfy. All things are transient. Your faith is transient, as is your body and mind and self. Even if you are right, the I that arises upon your death will not be the I you are: for how can it be? The soul without the mind and body is not the same thing as you, just as a wheel is not a chariot.
1. The dead can also return to Earth to perform miracles such as healing people. And it is believed by many in the church including me that the ghosts who haunt places are the souls of those in purgatory. As for my dead cat, God likely allowed him to return from heaven to relay the message that animals have afterlife.
2. But God is a loving father who only is harsh with his creation if they disobey him. Loving parents still have rules for their children to obey.
3. Purgatory is an official doctrine of the Catholic Church. And the soul without the mind and body still has the same consciousness that the person had while alive. They remember the events in their life, and they will have even more knowledge because they will have the beatific vision of God and have a greater understanding of him. The souls of the saved have happy memories of their life but be happier that they are in a happier place while the souls of the damned are tormented with eternal regret that they did not repent of their sins as well as the pain of fire and the chief punishment they have is eternal separation from God.
 
Mr. Jacob Harrison, have you considered trying to convert some of the uncontacted tribes in the world who will never have a chance to hear the gospel like the Sentinelese?

God would surely reward you if you could finish what the last missionary who tried to visit and convert them didn't finish.

Death of John Allen Chau ( 2018 )

In November 2018, John Allen Chau, a 26-year-old American missionary trained and sent by Missouri-based missionary organization All Nations, travelled illegally to North Sentinel Island by paying local fishermen, intending to make contact with and live among the Sentinelese in the hope of converting them to Christianity.

...

On his final visit, on 17 November, Chau instructed the fishermen to leave without him. The fishermen later saw the islanders dragging Chau's body, and the next day they saw his body on the shore.

Or perhaps you could visit North Korea and spread the gospel like missionary Kenneth Bae, with God on your side I'm sure nothing could go wrong.

View attachment 656612
Good for both of them, but I think that it is the will of God for me to live a long time so that I can win the most converts. Though if it is his will, I am willing to go to North Korea and become a martyr.
 
Back
Top Bottom