Porn Ban Debate Thread

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Porn is a sociateal addiction, and the poeple born now are socialized to it so hard that it would cause some kind of societal psychosis if not replaced with something. Everyone, the kids, the teens, the adults, are hypersexual now. We often use the term now-a-days to talk about only the most extreme hypersexuality, but the truth is that if you masturbate most days you are hypersexual compared to the baseline human behaviour pre-internet. Just think about it, only 40 years ago, if you wanted to see porn you'd have to go get it, and then you'd only have that one. Most porn consumed was still images, now you can look up hyper-stimulating porn music videos with over 100 women getting loads in the face in under 10 minutes.

Human sexual behaviour was never meant for this level of stimulation, but, my main point here is that if you ban porn, you're taking the ipad away from the gorilla, and it's going to be pissed. for the current generation, the only way to get it done would be to rearrange society in a way that normalizes weird sex in the real world (BDSM clubs, etc. would become a normal part of people's lives) or somehow directly or indirectly increasing the speed in which couples form. There may be other subtitutions that would work, I'm generalizing.

Now, if you really wanted the banning of porn and degenerate sexual behaviour (which is a result of porn, mostly, porn and molestation basically), you'd basically have to seperate the next generation from this one, which is obviously full of all kinds of evils (though they do seem to be trying)

I guess I'm not coming at this from a place of "should or shouldn't", obviously the right anwser is that it should be mostly banned, at least in it's current hyperstiumlating form, you could leave softcore stuff and be alright sociateally I think, but is such a thing even possible? At the current moment, I think you'd see rape and violence rates skyrocket. Just look at how indians act because there's not enough women to go around and their government basically looks the other way on rape culture because if they cracked down on it they'd get the same problems I'm talking about. Men who have been hypersexualized need an outlet. And men in the current reality are hypersexualized.
 
Obscenity isn't considered free speech and the goal is to expand what is considered obscenity is so they can simply ban porn. I would go look at this thread as it's what spurned on this discussion again.
Personally I don't take much stock in people preaching the morality of porn in a place such as this.
obscenity is subjective many basic movies today would have been considered obscenity in the 30s or 40s and in 50 years standards will change again, and even now standards vary a lot by politics which is why theres debate over what books are ok for school.
 
No one needs porn, but how many people would be willing to give it up?
If our ancestors are any indication (and I mean even just the previous generation or two, not just ancient ones) then uhhhh... maybe a few people who have extreme religious awakenings or a couple of dudes who masturbate themselves into ED and summon the strength of will to quit so they can function again?

Porn should be heavily regulated, but I doubt it can be outright banned. Due to the existence of cameras being everywhere it's impossible to stop it from being produced by Tom and Mary in their bedroom.

Once the ban comes, theres no legal protections for women or children from abuse, enjoy the utopia
Are you actually naive enough to think that underground child sex trafficking and illegal prostitution rings aren't already a very real, very large industry?
I'm also not sure how banning porn suddenly removes legal protection from women and children. You're gonna have to explain that one.
 
Are you actually naive enough to think that underground child sex trafficking and illegal prostitution rings aren't already a very real, very large industry?
I'm also not sure how banning porn suddenly removes legal protection from women and children. You're gonna have to explain that one.
Because it minimizes it obviously. You'd rather no protections? Or some?
 
Im against porn but I'm also against censorship in most general cases. If porn were to be banned, given how big of an industry the porn industry is, it's likely, or at least possible, that the people most affected wouldn't be e girls or porn video companies (they would no doubt bribe themselves out of trouble) but rather small movie directors or art projects that employ nudity in order to critique topics or touch on certain themes.

I think porn is bad- that said, eroticism and sexuality are natural aspects of what it means to be a fully developed human being and its natural that it's a theme that shows up again and again in art either literally or as symbolism for something else. People often conflate the two and mistake any nudity, even in a medical context, for something pornographic. And censors often have trouble dealing with nuance (and with perhaps good reason... think of all the gooners that try to justify the degeneracy claiming "oh I watch it for the plot bro" )...

So... I'm not sure I'm willing to trust an organ of the state or a third party to use its control for good and never mess up.

That said, being optimistic... yeah, I think it would be a better world if at least filmed porn was banned or heavily restricted. It's a predatory and exploitative industry both regarding its actors and its audiences.
 
Last edited:
He's clearly addicted I think we should use the Mao Zedong approach to coomers seemed to work quite well.
I think you're all terribly misguided faggots who got led astray by Jordan Peterson and his ilk who LARP as good Christian boys and girls. The reality is sexual gratification is a biological need and there's no getting around it. If you have no significant other in your lives, your only choice is self gratification. However you choose to do that, porn or otherwise, is on you.

Porn is not real, and if you're an adult and don't realize that then you're a retard and should kys to cleanse the gene pool. If you want to act out your degenerate fantasies in reality in a fursuit, you deserve to be mocked and ridiculed. Also, don't give me that bullshit that porn is "bad for women". The porn industry doesn't exist without women. We didn't get Big Booty Butt Sluts 127 because women were saints. As for the married women who don't want husbands watching porn, fine. You can ask that. However, when you turn down sex for the sixth week in a row because you "have headaches" or "don't feel like it tonight", don't be surprised when Redheaded Sluts 4 comes back on. You have no sympathy and you deserve no sympathy. That goes for the men too. Also, if you're married and spending money on OnlyFans, literally kys.

Children are an entirely different matter. I'm all for making porn harder to access for children. However, I don't think government bans and overreach are the answer. Child locked hardware and technology specifically designed to limit their access to the internet is the way of the future. Government bans and registries are not the answer. We as parents should try our hardest to keep the children off the internet. That being said, a 13 year old boy going through puberty will squint at two rocks until they kind of look like boobs. You have a notorious meme about the blurry TV channel where 12-14 year old millenials spent literal hours staring at literal TV static on the porn channels in the hopes of seeing some very blurry boobs. Determined kids will go to extreme lengths and find a way. It's just a reality and arguing over it is pointless.

The Porn Ban Debate is absolutely retarded and I can't help but feel like this is some kind of zionist distraction to keep us occupied and infighting. I don't have any proof or justification for that claim. However, after decades of living in this fake and gay world, call it instinct. It reeks of gayops and this whole debate feels manufactured.
 
Because it minimizes it obviously. You'd rather no protections? Or some?
It minimizes the protection of women and children? I asked you to explain what you meant. That's not an explanation. That's a poor rephrase.
 
The reality is sexual gratification is a biological need and there's no getting around it.

The reality is the humans existed for thousands of years without pornography, and absolutely no one needs pornography anymore than they need to sniff glue, you feeble minded, coombrained porno junkie. A ban would be good for you. It might even save some of your few remaining braincells.
 
The reality is the humans existed for thousands of years without pornography, and absolutely no one needs pornography anymore than they need to sniff glue, you feeble minded, coombrained porno junkie. A ban would be good for you. It might even save some of your few remaining braincells.
Thousands of years ago me and couple of good ol boys went to the nearest village and killed all of their men and took their women as sex slaves. We picked the ones that we decided to bear our children and sold the women we were tired of graping for supplies and weapons. Then we went to the next village and did the same thing all over again until we decided to settle and reap the land or someone killed us. You tend to not need porn when you have a harem of sex slaves to satiate yourself with. You also don't tend to need porn when you're married off by 14 and having children. Even then, go read old literature. It's full of sex jokes and degenerate acts. There's no need for porn when you have pillaging and raping.
 
Other users have already pointed out that banning pornography would just drive it underground and make it impossible to regulate. I 100% agree that porn is bad, but consenting adults have a right to engage in whatever mutual business they want.

The reality is the humans existed for thousands of years without pornography, and absolutely no one needs pornography anymore than they need to sniff glue, you feeble minded, coombrained porno junkie. A ban would be good for you. It might even save some of your few remaining braincells.
Pornography dates back as far as Mesopotamia/Assyria.
 
The reality is the humans existed for thousands of years without pornography
Wrong. Erotic art has existed for as long as we’ve been able to make art.
Thousands of years ago me and couple of good ol boys went to the nearest village and killed all of their men and took their women as sex slaves
Wrong. Chad and Thad went go hunt women and got sex slaves, your great great great great great great great grandpappy was nagged at by his wife Bertha after a long day of tilling Chad and Thad’s grain fields.
 
Porn is not real, and if you're an adult and don't realize that then you're a retard and should kys to cleanse the gene pool. If you want to act out your degenerate fantasies in reality in a fursuit, you deserve to be mocked and ridiculed. Also, don't give me that bullshit that porn is "bad for women". The porn industry doesn't exist without women. We didn't get Big Booty Butt Sluts 127 because women were saints. As for the married women who don't want husbands watching porn, fine. You can ask that. However, when you turn down sex for the sixth week in a row because you "have headaches" or "don't feel like it tonight", don't be surprised when Redheaded Sluts 4 comes back on. You have no sympathy and you deserve no sympathy. That goes for the men too. Also, if you're married and spending money on OnlyFans, literally kys.
Lol the porn being anti woman comes because of how the pornography industry is linked to sex trafficking (Up to the point actual CP was legal in some countries), but nice social commentary fag, going to mention women liking choking next? (I know this doesn't apply to only fans whores nowdays but my point still stands) I do not have the ridiculous Madonna-Whore complex from the terminally online right but it's
Thousands of years ago me and couple of good ol boys went to the nearest village and killed all of their men and took their women as sex slaves. We picked the ones that we decided to bear our children and sold the women we were tired of graping for supplies and weapons. Then we went to the next village and did the same thing all over again until we decided to settle and reap the land or someone killed us. You tend to not need porn when you have a harem of sex slaves to satiate yourself with. You also don't tend to need porn when you're married off by 14 and having children. Even then, go read old literature. It's full of sex jokes and degenerate acts. There's no need for porn when you have pillaging and raping.
A stupid anachronism to compare what existed in ancient times (Not all nudity is pornographic or erotic in the first place,) to what we have now is a cope when even people that did not get exposed to it at an early age suffer the effects. I'm sure a few users of this site already had people that are otherwise normal (Not lolcows or freaks) discussing their coom fantasies in detail.
 
Wrong. Chad and Thad went go hunt women and got sex slaves, your great great great great great great great grandpappy was nagged at by his wife Bertha after a long day of tilling Chad and Thad’s grain fields.
Grandpappy and Bertha were also sold to each other by the age of 10 for some chickens and a pig. Bertha also wasn't allowed to say "No I have a headache". He always had an outlet.

I don't think you people really understand. You're all remarkably short sighted. Barring Trump truly enacting a Golden Age; banning porn is not going to create the Trad Christian world you want to create. It's only going to create a lot of violent, aggravated men, who are going to wake up from coomdaze and realize they have no futures and are financially doomed and now have an eager need for sexual gratification that they cannot solve. Gee, I wonder how shitstain rapefugees got to be the way they were...

It's really astounding how none of you can see that maybe eliminating the things pacifying men while also brow beating them into the dirt can't lead to anything good. But hey, you're convincing me! I'm now into the porn ban. Burn it all down. I can't wait for the people who don't comprehend potential consequences of their actions to once again bear the consequences of their actions. That's always a fun time.
 
Grandpappy and Bertha were also sold to each other by the age of 10 for some chickens and a pig. Bertha also wasn't allowed to say "No I have a headache". He always had an outlet.

I don't think you people really understand. You're all remarkably short sighted. Barring Trump truly enacting a Golden Age; banning porn is not going to create the Trad Christian world you want to create. It's only going to create a lot of violent, aggravated men, who are going to wake up from coomdaze and realize they have no futures and are financially doomed and now have an eager need for sexual gratification that they cannot solve. Gee, I wonder how shitstain rapefugees got to be the way they were...

It's really astounding how none of you can see that maybe eliminating the things pacifying men while also brow beating them into the dirt can't lead to anything good. But hey, you're convincing me! I'm now into the porn ban. Burn it all down. I can't wait for the people who don't comprehend potential consequences of their actions to once again bear the consequences of their actions. That's always a fun time.
You have a very poor view of yourself if removing porn from the equation turns you into a violent retard rapefugee and I’m sorry you think of yourself that way.
Nothing ever happens though and that also applies to you rising up and becoming der Übermensch Foid Raper.
 
One thing I've noticed is that a decent chunk of the people who are most vocally in favour of banning porn are porn addicts themselves.

The first group are gooners who want to stop, but have such little self-control that they want big daddy government to step in and force them to go cold turkey.
The second group are gooners who think that the specific type of pornography that they consume is different, and would therefore be exempt from being banned. I've seen an unusually-high amount of women who schlick themselves to deranged written smut, who simultaneously argue that pornography should be banned.
 
Back
Top Bottom