Porn and Porncows

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Yeah, you kinda are. You don't shut down a data center because someone uploaded child porn onto a computer hosted there. I thought were were getting somewhere, but you'd rather climb on up there on that cross to nail yourself to it, so please don't let me stop you. :story:
What cross? I didn't say anything about shutting down an entire data center lol. You're making this into something it isn't. This ties into what I was saying about pro-active moderation, I don't even own a website but I would not want illegal content on it if I did. If the problem had been so neglected or grown so large that CNN made a publication on it, clearly the existing measures are not sufficient no?
 
I guess what I'm saying is I'm not (yet) convinced Motherless is deliberately allowing the stuff to stay online
yeah its jew owner CLEARLY just 'forgot' to add a word filter for 'kill' or 'killed' or 'death' to his porn video hosting website
 
RIP motherless, the site I used to. Use when me and my friends would play the find the most degenerate thing. On the Internet to send each other. Ah man, the early 2000s were a weird time. To be a kid.
I've got something to say about that site. So it's kinda unique in that it has "galleries", meaning collages of videos and images users make for fetishes. I've dived there for that, since it's the one place to go if you look for something very niche and specific. Not gonna powerlevel about that, but by accident I've stumbled into galleries that are named with strings of random letters, containing only images, that can only be described as... well, imagine a photo collection from Epstein Island. I couldn't fucking believe what I saw. There was scarcely anything explicit there, but one gallery was... special - pretty much images of very young looking girls (allegedly "all 18+" "teens"), uh, being carnal with rather old and used looking guys, set in a rather rich-looking environment. I wouldn't be suprised if it ackshually was straight from some rape island...

Needless to say I chickened out and dropped that accursed site for a while. Lately went there to look for some random video, and this popped out:
1778827627265.png

So it appears my suspicions were correct. Fucking sordid, dude.
 
Doublepost, so please be patient.
Unless you can prove Motherless was commissioning, supporting or encouraging that activity, and/or were covering it up or refusing to remove such content when discovered and reported, no, it's not criminal. This is literally the entire purpose of the DMCA's safe harbor provisions. If hosts are held liable for their users' actions, there could be no hosts. Great demonstration of the camel getting its nose into the tent though.
Whoever moderates motherless allowed galleries like "Things I rub my FtM clit to" to stay up. No really, that's what it is named.
Examples of what's inside:
- Short video of a very very young looking girl being served something to drink mid-coitus and going apeshit immediately. There's a caption "It's your fault for accepting my drink". My guess is she was served liquid Ecstasy.
- Few videos of, how to explain... tied-up men and women having their genitals eaten alive by "hyperworms". What's worse than seeing these... things wriggling under their skin? There's no screams, but you can clearly hear the bugs... meaning these poor souls must have been heavily drugged.
Yeah, I get that. I think we actually agree on this :)

I guess what I'm saying is I'm not (yet) convinced Motherless is deliberately allowing the stuff to stay online. I'm happy to admit being wrong if it's proven otherwise; it just seems like right now people are hopping aboard the usual train of thought that justifies censorship rather than stopping actual crimes.
I'm certain they don't allow it to stay online on purpose. I've seen lots of galleries nuked from the orbit (Unfortunately, there's nothing to see here, try out the random video feature!) but the titles still were there and they left little to imagination. Few of the more stomach-churning videos I've had in browser history have been nuked, too, in the few weeks time when I tried to check them out again.

This site is fucking Evil. If anyone of the Autism & Niggers moralizing faggots tries to call me names again over what I said about lolicon I'm gonna link them to this post and laught. I'd take a thousand Chibi Reviews and GatorGamers lusting over smol anime girl armpits over motherless.com. Absolutely nothing of value will be lost if the owners get arrested and put in prison.
 
I've got something to say about that site. So it's kinda unique in that it has "galleries", meaning collages of videos and images users make for fetishes. I've dived there for that, since it's the one place to go if you look for something very niche and specific. Not gonna powerlevel about that, but by accident I've stumbled into galleries that are named with strings of random letters, containing only images, that can only be described as... well, imagine a photo collection from Epstein Island. I couldn't fucking believe what I saw. There was scarcely anything explicit there, but one gallery was... special - pretty much images of very young looking girls (allegedly "all 18+" "teens"), uh, being carnal with rather old and used looking guys, set in a rather rich-looking environment. I wouldn't be suprised if it ackshually was straight from some rape island...

Needless to say I chickened out and dropped that accursed site for a while. Lately went there to look for some random video, and this popped out:
View attachment 9008420

So it appears my suspicions were correct. Fucking sordid, dude.
Bruh wth, you glimpsed at hell? Did you at least pray for God's protection before browsing hell?
 
I'm certain they don't allow it to stay online on purpose.
...so by your own admission they're doing as they should be (compliant with legal and moral obligation), are acting proactively in response to complaints ... and they're still "evil" and must be destroyed anyway?

I assume sites like 2girls1cup, tubgirl, goatse and meatspin are similarly hellish and must be cleansed in nuclear fire as well? Documentingreality.com (note we have a similar thread here with similar content) too? Hell, we archive the sick shit trannies do ... should we be banned too?

Can you try to see my point instead of just snarking back, btw? That'd be neat. I'm tired of repeating myself.
 
I guess what I'm saying is I'm not (yet) convinced Motherless is deliberately allowing the stuff to stay online.
I haven't told some details about Motherless because knowing this stuff makes you sound like a pedophile, but I just had a personal feud against the website at the time.

At the start of Motherless, it intentionally hosted CP, they even had an official tag for it IIRC. When the law pushed them to take the illegal content off the platform, they made the tag unsearchable/unfilterable, and stopped new uploads, but did not remove the content with this tag.

Every illegal picture and video had to be removed slowly through their takedown system. There was nothing stopping the website owners from sorting by the CP tag and removing all of the fucking CP. This was almost a decade ago, I have no idea if they have cleaned house since, but that alone should make them liable.

Total (((porn site owner))) death
 
Can you try to see my point instead of just snarking back, btw?
I do see your fucking point and if I'm snarking, then not at you. Dude c'mon, a month & a half ago I've got a prospering grounds thread on myself made and people coming on my profile calling me a pedophile because I've dared to say that lolicon is not CSAM and that it should not be banned and that people who consume it do not actually hurt anyone by fapping to 2D cutouts.
I don't wish motherless to be memoryholed, but I think absolutely nothing of value would be lost if it disappeared overnight and everyone responsible for these extremely rapey videos hosted by motherless would end up raped and murdered in prison.
...so by your own admission they're doing as they should be (compliant with legal and moral obligation), are acting proactively in response to complaints ... and they're still "evil" and must be destroyed anyway?
They're absolutely, 100% certainly uppercase-E Evil, but destroyed? No.
How the fuck else am I supposed to call an image of a girl that's maybe 13, tops, smiling to the camera while being under a leathery and greasy guy looking like he's 80 (because she'd be strangled and thrown into the trash if she doesn't smile)? Where, who the fuck... is it AI? I don't think so.
Legality has 0 to do with ethics. Slavery (Roman Empire, not your lame&gay niggers) was 100% legal for a very long time and nobody saw anything bad or wrong about it.
Bruh wth, you glimpsed at hell? Did you at least pray for God's protection before browsing hell?
Are ya making fun of me?
No. But I went from "porn sites host videos with trafficking victims and children, yeah right cool story bro" to "oh shi...".
 
Are ya making fun of me?
No. But I went from "porn sites host videos with trafficking victims and children, yeah right cool story bro" to "oh shi...".
No, I believe that seeing that will affect your soul, your spirit, the essence of your being, connection with heaven/higher plane etc. Etc, so you either pray for a "metaphysical prophylaxis", or for a "cure" to stem the "rot"/corruption that "latches" on to you. This is serious stuff, I think if you don't take proactive measures to nurture/cultivate your spirit you might end up like the old geezers.. maybe the pedo hunters should get involved
 
@QuasiAwesome
Well thank you, that's nice of you. Didn't mean to offend you if that happened.
Not into this spiritual stuff much, my horizon of "awful shit that ackshually did happen to someone irl and here's the proof" got expanded. Not good because every time it happens it leaves me more callous inside but... I think I'll stay in the drawn porn lane where I can be 100% sure the girls are neither pretending to like it nor they have been addicted to heroin and/or kidnapped.
Pedo hunters mmmaybe could identify some girls as from their missing list but IMO it'd be a waste of their time. Making an account there doesn't require anything that would identify the owner but his IP, maybe.
 
Apparently Andrew Tate's new protege Clavicular went to an "industry party" aka a sex trafficking meetup for porn Jews and their marketable items. He started berating them for being porn whores, they started arguing with him for being retarded, and now X has a bunch of aspiring jizz jugs treating this like it was a major happening. It's always good to laugh on a Friday
Screenshot_20260515-135400.png Screenshot_20260515-135416.png Screenshot_20260515-135454.png Screenshot_20260515-135506.png Screenshot_20260515-135525.png

 
Back
Top Bottom