Registration
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 14, 2021
Now this makes all the budget decision too much sense. It is intentional, they want GF fo fail. Because if they fail and let the game development up to air, they can sweep in via Nintendo or even outsourcing it to maximize their profits.I read through the PDF from 2021 going over the past structure of GF a little and how Masuda was kicked as director, and the part that made me stop the most was this slide.
View attachment 8038346
It's about their relationship with TPC, and it says that GF has a lot of independence to do whatever they want, but that also means they don't really work together or hear out requests. The particular point that draws my attention is that it says this means they often can't get development funds from TPC to make the games. They then say that because Legends Arceus was spearheaded by GF, they didn't receive any funds and almost had to pay the entire development costs themselves until talks where made with TPC at the last minute.
Is this why GF acts like they're a small, frugal company that can't afford anything? TPC and Nintendo suck up a big chunk of the revenue and then TPC refuses to work with GF on pooling money for development budgets?
Lets say that GF fails so bad that they have to close down. This only means that GF failed and left a space void for others (Nintendo and TCP to sweep in and do what they want)
Now imagine if all pokemon designs were created as marketeable creatures out of the bat, who would profit more from this creative decision? TCP or GF? If you aim for the kid's market, with designs and games intended for children, you will get them now and in the future, because you already have the adults in your pocket, they are your costumers already.
Now lets say that TCP gets even more control than Nintendo themselves. Why limit their reach to Nintendo hardware when they can sell stuff for other platforms and games? What if you outsource game development and make less time to pass between generations since you can have two teams working at the same time?
This makes so much damn sense. TPC wins anyway with the failure of the games or their success. Because for them, funding would never be an issue, and at this current level, they could literally pump out a single game each year with enough dev teams.
This is corporate bullshit at its finest, the games aren't important at all, the brand is. Their profits aren't based on the games itself but the derived profits of other merchandise. Damn, now I understand why GF is so much in deep shit