Pixar vs. Jewish Continuity - "What will Pixar come up with next? Assimilating Nemo? Shiksas Inc? Goy Story?"

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link | Archive

It’s the last week of summer vacation, my wife said. Let’s do movie night with the younger kids, she said.

I had heard that Pixar/Disney came out with a new movie. Pixar have made some of the best animated films - Finding Nemo, Toy Story, Monsters Inc, A Bug’s Life, Up, Wall-E, Onward, Inside Out, and more. They are all fantastic stories, with great messages, perfectly executed. Innocent stuff, suitable for a young Jewish audience. And so deciding to watch their new movie, Elemental, was a no-brainer. I’d heard that it was set in a world inhabited by anthropomorphized personifications of the four elements - Earth, Air, Fire and Water. The Fire characters are literally made of fire and can set things on fire; the Water characters can change form at will; the Earth characters grow things on their bodies; the Air characters waft through the air. I didn’t know anything more than that, but it sounded great!

Goodness, did I get a shock.

The entire movie was a promotion for intermarriage.

No, I’m not exaggerating. It began with a married Fire couple of a Fire religion, who speak a foreign language, fleeing suffering in their country by taking a ship to a gleaming new metropolis, Element City. They change their names at immigration to names that are pronounceable in English, but still suffer from anti-Fireism by the other elements. Their daughter, Ember, grows up Americanized, but still loyal to her parent’s fiery tradition and determined to continue their family fire business.

Then Ember meets a Water guy named Wade and starts to fall in love with him. At first, she thinks that it’s a relationship that can never get anywhere - after all, she is Fire and he is Water. Ember is afraid that touching him will result in her death. And her parents are furious at the mere idea of it. They say that their flame will be physically and conceptually extinguished. But finally, they all realize that love conquers all, that Ember intends to keep the family fire burning even though she’s abandoning the family business, and she is united with him forever (and miraculously isn’t extinguished by physical contact). It ends with the daughter and father exchanging a rite of religious respect, showing that her father understood that she wasn’t betraying their religion.

I was rather taken aback that a film’s entire message would be to promote intermarriage. (I subsequently discovered that the director is Korean and intended it to be about Asian immigrants, but it’s equally applicable to Jews.) And it neatly avoided discussing the challenges and problems with it. For example, what elements would their kids be? A dilution of Fire and Water wouldn’t have the strengths of either!

And if intermarriage between Earth, Air, Fire and Water becomes acceptable, how long does it take before the divisions disappear entirely? Sure, if your goal is a melting pot then it doesn’t matter so much, and it’s better to have everyone be the same. But the premise of the film was that the unique characteristics of the elements were actually valuable. How would these characteristics remain, if they are blended out of existence?

What will Pixar come up with next? Assimilating Nemo? Shiksas Inc? Goy Story?
 
wow literally racist omg
I was rather taken aback that a film’s entire message would be to promote intermarriage. (I subsequently discovered that the director is Korean and intended it to be about Asian immigrants, but it’s equally applicable to Jews.)
WHY DO YOU CARE THEN??!?
 
This guy is insane to speculate about the hypothetical kids of the characters. It's a movie about magical elemental beings.

Religious fundies take the L again, being utterly defeated about the most terrible of ennemy: a middling disney movie about the neurosis of Asian-Americans who are guilt-ridden because they went to an Art School instead of being doctors like their parents wanted.

Thankfully, there's some semi-based comments about the dangers of inbreeding and such.
 
I have a vision of the future and it's a hasid, a muslim and a redneck eviscerating a screaming billionaire at his front gate with a broken manieshewitz bottle.
 
Shiksas Inc?
Oh, that was done already.

It was called "Santa Inc" and mocked Christmas.

Sorry, Hebewitz, you aren't allowed to get upset. "It's just children's entertainment".

No, no, you don't get to protest. You made the rules, you have to live by them.
 
Be sure to watch Pixar's new movie: Hat. It's about a talking yarmukle in the 1940's that is immortal. Every time his host gets shoa'd, he passes on to a new one until he gets back to his original owner Anne Frank. It's a heartwarming tale that has critics saying "oy vey!"
 
The hypocrisy of the writer's position never occurs to him while he's advocating strict miscegenation, and that "Shiksas Inc? Goy Story?" bit is blatantly racist. No, seriously, if a Jewish person is calling you either of those things to your face, they're insulting you. Those are racist epithets.

I'm not antisemitic. I had a Jewish buddy in the Army. He's aces and we're still close to this day. I dated a Jewish girl in college and she was great, too. My personal and professional relationships with Jewish people over the years have all been positive.

But this? This pisses me off--not so much because he said what he said but because he knew he could get away with it while a white man couldn't. That's bullshit.
 
Care to offer us some more details about this subset of Jews that the author is part of
Lol, "part of"? He's the fuckin' rabbi!

"Exploring the legacy of the rationalist Rishonim (medieval sages), and various other notes, by Rabbi Dr. Natan Slifkin, director of The Biblical Museum of Natural History in Beit Shemesh. The views are those of the author, not the institution."
 
Lol, "part of"? He's the fuckin' rabbi!

"Exploring the legacy of the rationalist Rishonim (medieval sages), and various other notes, by Rabbi Dr. Natan Slifkin, director of The Biblical Museum of Natural History in Beit Shemesh. The views are those of the author, not the institution."
I like how Medieval Sages sounds, it's like a great RPG in the making.
I bet I would get along with this dude, and even persuade him to allow me to do some shitpoasty anti-Semitism at a drink or 5
 
Back
Top Bottom