Opinion Pete Hegseth Needs to Go—Now - Journos are really mad about their supply of drugs being cut off.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

A man with such contempt for the military should not run the Pentagon.​

By Tom Nichols
DECEMBER 1, 2025, 4:17 PM ET

1764632774086.jpeg
Mark Peterson / Redux

Presidents have always sent people to lead the Pentagon who respect the institutions and personnel of the armed forces, not least because Americans tend to bristle at any sign that an administration does not unreservedly support the men and women of the U.S. military. (Just ask Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, both of whom were castigated for such supposed disrespect.) In his first term, Trump sent General James Mattis, a veteran of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and then when Mattis quit, he appointed a long-serving defense professional, Mark Esper.

But this time, the president found a perfect instrument of destruction to send across the Potomac: Pete Hegseth, a Trump sycophant who served in the military, topped out at the mid-level rank of major, and left full of bitterness and resentment toward a military establishment that clearly didn’t value his brilliance and fortitude.

The halls of the Pentagon are apparently strewn with rakes these days, and Hegseth has managed to step on almost all of them, including security blunders, needless fights with the press, and envious, unmanly whining about the medals on the uniform of Senator Mark Kelly, a veteran of higher rank and far greater achievement than Hegseth himself. Like Trump, Hegseth thinks his job is to get even with people he views as enemies: When Hegseth pulled more than 800 senior officers into an auditorium to give them a long and pointless harangue, it was not only disrespectful, it was cringe-inducing, like watching the angriest kid in your high school coming back 20 years later as the principal and unloading his adolescent gripes at all the teachers in the staff lounge.

Read: Holy warrior

Now, however, Hegseth is in new and far more dangerous territory. The Washington Post reported last Friday that, back in September, Hegseth ordered the killing of the survivors of the first strike against what the administration says are terrorist-controlled drug boats. If this report is accurate, it means that Hegseth issued what is called a “no quarter” order, a crime in both American and international law.

So far, the president and the secretary have not disputed the facts, instead fumbling about with classic Beltway-style “non-denial denials.” Today, the White House admitted that the second strike did in fact take place, but on the orders of Special Operations Command chief Admiral Frank Bradley, which seems to be setting Bradley up as a scapegoat. Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said today that “Hegseth authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes,” adding that Bradley “worked well within his authority and the law directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”

This seems implausible. Bradley is an experienced officer who by virtue of his rank and position would be intimately familiar with the laws of armed conflict. He would have to know that such an order is likely a war crime, and any senior officer would want civilian leadership to sign off on an order with such potentially immense consequences, especially on the very first strike. (If the admiral actually did give the order on his own, that’s little comfort; it would mean Hegseth’s Defense Department is even more dysfunctional and out of control than anyone might have guessed.)

If either Hegseth or Bradley gave such an order—or if Hegseth issued the order and Bradley carried it out—both could be guilty of murder and war crimes. The United States, after World War II, prosecuted German and Japanese officers for similar offenses. (Yesterday, in fact, was the 80th anniversary of the execution by firing squad of Heinz-Wilhelm Eck, a Nazi U-Boat commander who sank a civilian steamer and then killed the survivors.) Such a possibility is horrendous enough, but Hegseth has since responded to these grave accusations with the crass juvenility characteristic of the toddlers who run this administration.

On Sunday, the secretary of defense of the United States of America posted a meme on X depicting Franklin, the cartoon turtle who is a beloved children’s book character, as a special forces operator killing people on boats. He added a comment: “For your Christmas wish list…” Just to make the point, the secretary tagged the X account of SOUTHCOM, the Southern Forces Command that has had to carry out the strikes, as if blowing up boats and killing the survivors was a joke to be shared with a chuckle and a backslap.

Perhaps Hegseth thinks that sinking boats on the high seas is funny. Maybe he just wanted to own the libs and all that. Or maybe he thought he could disrupt the gathering war crimes narrative, like the school delinquent pulling a fire alarm during an exam. Or maybe he just has poor judgment and even worse impulse control (which would explain a lot of things about Pete Hegseth). No matter the reason, his choice to trivialize the use of American military force reveals both the shallowness of the man’s character and the depth of his contempt for the military as an institution.

Posting stupid memes after being accused of murder is not the response of a patriot who must answer to the public about the security of the United States and its people in uniform. It is not the response of a secretary of defense who values the advice of the officers who report to him. It is not the response of a human being who comprehends the risks—and the costs—of ordering other people to kill helpless men clinging to the wreck of a boat.

It is, instead, the response of a sneering, spoiled punk who has been caught doing wrong and is now daring the local fuzz to take him in and risk the anger of his rich dad—a role fulfilled by Donald Trump, in this case.

Institutions, for a time, can cope with buffoonish leaders. While the secretary has been festooning the Pentagon with new “Department of War” signs, adults in the building have tried to conduct some of the nation’s geopolitical business. Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll, for example, is likely the Defense Department point man for Ukraine because Hegseth has made a fool of himself too many times to be taken seriously by American opponents. (The Russians would have to suppress the smirks on their faces if Hegseth were sent to Moscow or Geneva for anything more than a grip-and-grin photo opportunity.)

But Hegseth is still the secretary of defense. He can be kept out of important meetings and excluded from rooms where policies are being debated, but his authority to order the military into action means he can still risk American lives and get people killed. In a remarkable paradox, Hegseth’s formal power and personal incompetence—to say nothing of his apparently nonexistent moral compass—means he remains dangerous even if he is otherwise insignificant.

Read: 20 U.S. boat strikes in three months

Enough of this. Trump is president and has the right to stay in office for his term, even if he thinks fallen warriors are “losers” and “suckers” who have no purpose beyond serving his needs as props and pawns. He again showed how little he regards military lives this weekend when he was asked if he would attend the funeral of Sarah Beckstrom, the young West Virginia National Guardsman killed in Washington last week. He said he would think about it, and immediately then made her death about him by adding that he won big in West Virginia in the last election, as if that were relevant to whether he owed her his presence at her funeral.

Pete Hegseth, however, was elected by no one. He is an unprofessional—and sometimes unstable—appointee who does not seem to comprehend the seriousness of the office he occupies, does not respect the senior officers who serve this country, and does not seem to care at all about the people of the U.S. military, except that he’s worried that too many of them are fat—or women. Hegseth is unqualified, incompetent, and should have been fired months ago.

The secretary is unlikely to resign, but Trump has a record of throwing people under the bus when they are no longer of use to him, and Republicans should increase the pressure on him to fire the most unqualified secretary of defense in U.S. history. Let them and all Americans say to Hegseth what the British politician Leo Amery said to Neville Chamberlain as Europe began to crumble under the Nazi offensive in 1940: “Depart, I say, and let us have done with you.” Channeling Oliver Cromwell from centuries earlier, Amery added: “In the name of God, go.”

In the name of God, Pete Hegseth, go.

Source (Archive)
 
Bitching about how "useless" blowing up drug boats is because it doesn't get most of the supply is like bitch that small time drug busts by patrol officers is useless because dealers exist.

Anyway, the more journoswine whine and cry about the actions of Trump and his people, the more I smile. We will Make America Great Again.
 
Enough of this. Trump is president and has the right to stay in office for his term, even if he thinks fallen warriors are “losers” and “suckers” who have no purpose beyond serving his needs as props and pawns
Still running with this thoroughly debunked horseshit? Trump needs to start suing these sniveling worms for libel.

Reminder that Tom Nichols is a Never-Served chickenhawk who thinks he's hot shit because he taught some classes at Annapolis once upon a time (and just a few short years ago, was apoplectically *demanding* that we put boots on the ground in Ukraine).

Hegseth, meanwhile, traded lead against Hadjis in the sandbox. He's a modern-day George Patton, and that makes the incompetent faggots of the previous regime cope and seethe.
Pete Hegseth, however, was elected by no one.
He was duly nominated by POTUS and confirmed by the Senate, as is the law.

We voted for Trump to appoint him to kill narcos, terrorists, and everyone else who wishes to harm Americans. I'm sorry that the will of the people is inconvenient to you (and your benefactors in China).
This right here.
Oh hey, it's you again, Mr. "BOO HOO HOO SNAKE EATERS ARE MEAN AND HURT MY FEEWINGS!"

Hegseth is a million times more competent that Mark Milley and Lloyd Austin, who lost our longest war to literal cavemen in the most humiliating fashion possible. Which is unfortunate for the likes of you who jack off to the thought of ISIS and Tren de Aragua having absolute global rule because it makes your line go up.

I know why you want what you want. You want our military staffed with troons, faggots, and women because that will make us easier to conquer. I regret to inform you you will not be getting that for the forseeable future.

"But, but, but muh Fort Bragg Cartel is VIOLENT and NOT HECKIN' NICE!"

I don't want a "nice" military. I want America's wars to be fought by the meanest bastards on earth. I want America's enemies to grovel at our feet, defeated and humiliated.

We are the dominant world power, it is time we started acting like it, instead of the world's communal fleshlight.
 
Last edited:
Like Trump, Hegseth thinks his job is to get even with people he views as enemies: When Hegseth pulled more than 800 senior officers into an auditorium to give them a long and pointless harangue, it was not only disrespectful, it was cringe-inducing, like watching the angriest kid in your high school coming back 20 years later as the principal and unloading his adolescent gripes at all the teachers in the staff lounge.
Tell me you've never been in the military, without telling me you've never been in the military. The only difference is he was doing it to people who usually avoid such behavior due to rank. Someone got bullied/yelled at in the military? Stop the fucking presses.

Hegseth is a million times more competent that Mark Milley and Lloyd Austin, who lost our longest war to literal cavemen in the most humiliating fashion possible. Which is unfortunate for the likes of you who jack off to the thought of ISIS and Tren de Aragua having absolute global rule because it makes your line go up.
One of the biggest things this article highlights is the preference of career officers. They mock Hegseth for only making Major, when the truth is, you don't make it past Major without being part of the boys club; everything O-4 and above is a political appointee. They want people who can think for themselves, stand up to Trump, etc etc; they'd want people like Hegseth who hasn't been part of the club (like Mattis unfortunately was). Whether because it's part of their commie coup or because they're true believers, these people would advocate for a bullet to the head as long as they got some doctor paid off to claim it. One of the reasons shit is such a disaster, is because they use the picture of competence via a long career to claim expertise; nevermind they're mostly incompetence and stay in place because the entire upper echelons are held up via fear from bringing everything down. They want trials for saying Hegseth and others deserve trials for war crimes, we can start with their golden boy Milley, who knowingly lied to The President and even engaged in secret communication with China. We can start with executing that traitor first.
 
Last edited:
One of the biggest things this article highlights is the preference of career officers. They mock Hegseth for only making Major, when the truth is, you don't make it past Major without being part of the boys club; everything O-4 and above is a political appointee.
That's the Iron Law of Institutions for ya. The mission will always be sacrificed upon the altar of the Good Ol' Boys Club. And woe to anyone who tries to fix that.
 
Remains unbelievable to me that libs are trying to run with this. You would think this Harvard professor of military blahblahblah would know that yes, the military kills people. This isn't like machinegunning a bunch of German POWs in Ardennes, either; these drug runners aren't surrendering, there is nobody there for them to surrender to, they don't even know they're in a fight until the explosion happens. They're just going about their job trafficking drugs on known transit routes for what the US calls a terrorist organization. Extremely valid targets for killing.

Am I supposed to forget Obama's drone wars, by the way? Where were these crocodile tears when the Nobel Peace Prize President was blowing up weddings and shit like that.
>Chocolate Messiah kills 50% civilians, including children and US citizens, with drone strikes
>media silent
>Hegseth kills drug smugglers from Venezuela who are funding Islamic terrorists
>media big mad

I know these faggots drink their own Kool-Aid, but come on.
 
Do they mean “now” as in right now or “now” as in nownownownownow?

Because both are about as effective as they sound lol. It’s like yelling advice to the characters on screen in a movie theater.

View attachment 8239261
MY WIFES BOYFRIEND IS ANGRY
I immediately thought of this scene from ST:TNG.
 
They make it sound like Pete just saw a random boat and said "those jungle beaners are probably carrying drugs, bomb their asses just to be sure"
Journos have been putting "narco" in snark-quotes, which they love to do when attempting to gaslight you into believing conservatives are either hallucinating or making shit up.

Yes, these retards really do think Trump is some comic book villain who decided to start just bombing boats at random, claiming they're drug runners, and share footage bragging about it. As if that wouldn't blow up in his face bigly in no time.
 
Even more to the point: the American people aren't doing their job of keeping their elected officials' feet to the flame at every level.
The American people had abdicated that duty even longer than that back in the 19th Century. Worse yet is them intentionally establishing the new American aristocracy to get the government bacon continuously brought to their districts.
 
The army probably knew what they even had for breakfast the day they got bombed
As far as I know the Army is still manned by mostly the same dudes that were there under Biden, minus some trannies and DEI hires. That still leaves a bunch of dysfunctional assholes looking for a paycheck over serving their nation and being competent.
As if that wouldn't blow up in his face bigly in no time.
How would it blow up in his face?
 
Don't play dumb.
I’m not. The evidence they were civilians is at the bottom of the ocean and even if it were revealed they were the administration would call it fake news by Maduro and liberals with TDS and MAGA would just say ‘yeah but they were brown anyway so lol’ so where do you think the real danger comes from POTUS indiscriminately killing some brownies in a boat? When has a President committing crimes ever faced real consequences outside fucking Nixon and I guess Clinton?
 
I’m not. The evidence they were civilians is at the bottom of the ocean and even if it were revealed they were the administration would call it fake news by Maduro and liberals with TDS and MAGA would just say ‘yeah but they were brown anyway so lol’ so where do you think the real danger comes from POTUS indiscriminately killing some brownies in a boat? When has a President committing crimes ever faced real consequences outside fucking Nixon and I guess Clinton?
In dozens of interviews in villages on Venezuela's breathtaking northeastern coast, from which some of the boats departed, residents and relatives said the dead men had indeed been running drugs but were not narco-terrorists or leaders of a cartel or gang.
You can twist around as much as you want trying to find a way to say dey wuz gud bois dey dindu nuffin
 
Yes, these retards really do think Trump is some comic book villain who decided to start just bombing boats at random, claiming they're drug runners, and share footage bragging about it. As if that wouldn't blow up in his face bigly in no time.
Oh no, that definitely wouldn't make me like that mean old cheeto man. Not more swarming hordes of brownoids
 
Journos have been putting "narco" in snark-quotes, which they love to do when attempting to gaslight you into believing conservatives are either hallucinating or making shit up.

Yes, these retards really do think Trump is some comic book villain who decided to start just bombing boats at random, claiming they're drug runners, and share footage bragging about it. As if that wouldn't blow up in his face bigly in no time.
If I remember right, the first boat strike or two were like covered-top boats or something, so every lib was like "it probably wasn't even drugs." But I think now most of the footage is clearly boats stuffed full of barrels or wrapped kilos. So now it's "you probably violated some law of war by killing them." Reflexively moving the goalpost

When has a President committing crimes ever faced real consequences outside fucking Nixon and I guess Clinton?
They tried to stick Trump with like 30 fake crimes over the last decade, why wouldn't they seize on a real one if he offered it up?
 
Back
Top Bottom