- Joined
- Nov 27, 2024
The same could be said of murder. Banning something doesn't make it disappear, it makes it unfashionable. It's a mark that some behaviors (althought they exist) are not accepted.There's absolutely zero way porn could be banned.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The same could be said of murder. Banning something doesn't make it disappear, it makes it unfashionable. It's a mark that some behaviors (althought they exist) are not accepted.There's absolutely zero way porn could be banned.
The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a penis is a good guy with a penis. It’s literally in their constitution.Just ban sex. Simple as that.
People who advocate for banning porn are short-sighted idiots.The same could be said of murder. Banning something doesn't make it disappear, it makes it unfashionable. It's a mark that some behaviors (althought they exist) are not accepted.
Yes, the masses are sheep that need to be lead.Do you really want the people who’ve built themselves gooncaves to stop, reenter society, and pass on their genes instead of wasting away staring at their 2D waifus?
NoDo you really want the people who’ve built themselves gooncaves to stop, reenter society
He says obscene things should be banned.
Hear me out on this but I think people may find that the content on this site obscene.There is no logical reason why a this site should be banned.
This case set a good standard for what is obscene.Hear me out on this but I think people may find that the content on this site obscene.
You do know there is fart queen tranny porn on this website and leaked nudes don’t you?
Yep, the entirety of Animal Control and BP would fall under obscene. Thank you for proving my point.
Unless you're a US of A judge, your opinion doesn't matter. Which is why the arguments are about judicial rulings, not subjective anonymous opinions (yours or mine).Hear me out on this but I think people may find that the content on this site obscene.
yep. I don't think null will be too upset if hosting it is banned. But I don't want to speak for him.You do know there is fart queen tranny porn on this website and leaked nudes don’t you?
Unless you're a US of A judge, your opinion doesn't matter. Which is why the arguments are about judicial rulings, not subjective anonymous opinions (yours or mine).
I'm sure a judge would find it obscene as well.Yep, the entirety of Animal Control and BP would fall under obscene.
Wait up, I might be kinda retarded but doesn't Roth v US actually uphold the legality of most forms of phonography by introducing the "redeeming social importance" loophole as a distinguishing factor from obscene materials with the boom of the pornography industry in the 70s as a direct result?
Really it was Miller v California that opened the floodgates. I'm not for banning all nudity. Artistic nudity was covered by Roth. which is why I think it's a better ruling.Wait up, I might be kinda retarded but doesn't Roth v US actually uphold the legality of most forms of phonography by introducing the "redeeming social importance" loophole as a distinguishing factor from obscene materials and lead to the boom of the pornography industry in the 70s?
Mate, the works of Robert Maplethorpe were literally deemed as artistic nudity in the 70s and the aids-ridden faggot was known for photographing extreme gay sex. The artistic nudity excuse might be interpreted a bit more loosely that you think. But sure, it's such a good anti-porn ruling.Really it was Miller v California that opened the floodgates. I'm not for banning all nudity. Artistic nudity was covered by Roth. which is why I think it's a better ruling.
which is why we need "redeeming social importance" as a clause. Robert Mapplethorpe's works were mostly in the 80s after the Miller case. his first work was one year before the miller case in 1972.Mate, the works of Robert Maplethorpe were literally deemed as artistic nudity in the 70s and the aids-ridden faggot was known for photographing extreme gay sex. The artistic nudity excuse might be interpreted a bit more loosely that you think.
No, the people who get paid to do medicine for a living that you claim don't know as much as you do because you watch a few Youtube videos and listen to Tucker Carlson. When you claim that Alex Jones is the healthiest man in the planet just cracks me up though.You mean all the medical professionals getting censored by authoritarian dim bulbs like you? Ah, "Hollywood", right, you're probably a kike pedo like the rest of 'em.
Other than incitement to violence or a riot, what speech is banned in this country? You didn't answer my questions, little guy.You didn't answer the question. In your view, what makes something ok to ban? We currently have banned speech in this country. Do you agree that's a good thing?
Comparing porn with murder. This is why everyone laughs at you bible thumping incelsThe same could be said of murder. Banning something doesn't make it disappear, it makes it unfashionable. It's a mark that some behaviors (althought they exist) are not accepted.
Child porn.Other than incitement to violence or a riot, what speech is banned in this country? You didn't answer my questions, little guy.
I'm watching Twin Peaks, playing Cataclysm Bright Nights and poosting.I understand the intention behind your response, but given your constant replies in this thread, I'm starting to worry that you might be having an HHH-induced mental breakdown. You do know this is what he does?