Culture Paramount: we won’t remove content from eras with ‘different sensibilities’ - Boss of media company says it would be a mistake to censor art because it may offend some people today

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

1656267779581.png

The boss of the US media company Paramount has said he does not want to remove historic programmes from his new subscription streaming service because they no longer meet current expectations.

Bob Bakish, Paramount’s CEO, said his company had thousands of shows in its back catalogue. “By definition, you have some things that were made in a different time and reflect different sensibilities,” he said. “I don’t believe in censoring art that was made historically, that’s probably a mistake. It’s all on demand – you don’t have to watch anything you don’t want to.”

Streaming companies have struggled with how to adapt to modern cultural expectations when it comes to archive shows, with BritBox and the BBC’s iPlayer among those removing content that is no longer deemed appropriate for modern tastes.

Bakish also said the company would not comment on speculation linking it to a potential purchase of a privatised Channel 4, saying: “We’re good with where we are in the UK.”

Paramount, formerly known as ViacomCBS, owns the US television networks CBS, MTV and Nickelodeon, along with Paramount Pictures, which recently had a global hit with the film Top Gun: Maverick.

In the UK it is the parent company of Channel 5, which has enjoyed a revival under its ownership. Nevertheless, it is a late entrant to the British streaming market, which is already dominated by Netflix along with new arrivals such as Apple TV+ and Disney+.

As a result, Paramount+ is being pitched as an additional streaming service costing £6.99 that offers access to Paramount’s film back catalogue along with shows such as Star Trek, South Park and SpongeBob SquarePants.

The company has agreed a deal with Sky that will mean millions of Sky Cinema customers will receive Paramount+ for free. Although this gives Paramount instant access to millions of customers, it also means it will earn less money per customer.

Bakish said: “We don’t view streamers as a winner-takes-all market. We want to be one of a number of services in the household.”
 
Good on them. Don't get offended about a show if the only thing you can even be upset about it is the fact that it exists.
 
"It’s all on demand – you don’t have to watch anything you don’t want to.”

It's not about watching it or not. The perpetual umbrage takers just need something to complain about so they can feel good about themselves and get ass pats on Twitter.
 
A reasonable response.

99.9% of everyone who has ever lived on earth, across all races, genders, colors, creeds, and eras, would be considered "right-wing extremists" in comparison to Current Year sensibilities. You will not learn from the past by erasing it.
 
“I don’t believe in censoring art that was made historically, that’s probably a mistake. It’s all on demand – you don’t have to watch anything you don’t want to.”
Based.
 
Even if they don't remove it outright, I'm guessing they'll still preface them with one of those unskippable "This movie contains stereotypes that were wrong at the time, and are wrong today" messages that Disney+ stick in front of pretty much all their early animated movies.
 
Even if they don't remove it outright, I'm guessing they'll still preface them with one of those unskippable "This movie contains stereotypes that were wrong at the time, and are wrong today" messages that Disney+ stick in front of pretty much all their early animated movies.
I actually want people to have info and choices. Just run a message before everything instead that says “To learn more about the content in this presentation, please visit Google.com.” Or if they feel so inclined, the service itself can host a site that just lists the potentially objectionable content. Including gay and troon promotion, denigration of trad religion, objectionable stereotypes about white people, along with things leftists find offensive.
 
A reasonable response.

99.9% of everyone who has ever lived on earth, across all races, genders, colors, creeds, and eras, would be considered "right-wing extremists" in comparison to Current Year sensibilities. You will not learn from the past by erasing it.
The simple explanation is that a "right-wing extremist" is and always has been a normal human, and the woke bullshit we're seeing today is just a means to an end for a select group of shitbags to seize control, tear down the culture, and replace it with something that only benefits them.
 
Then you larp as a woke twittertard and help them achieve their goals till one day Hitler II is elected.
While also LARPing as an impossibly hammy rightoid so the retards with hero syndrome accelerate their histrionics till one day Hitler II is elected.
Also something about Nanomachines.
 
Honestly a pretty smart decision.
Plenty of boomers will pay for reruns of their fav show, jut to eat the memberberries.
And with modern algorithms you can easily make it so that some woketard never ever sees the old stuff without explicitly searching for it.
 
Back
Top Bottom