OnlyFans stops allowing sexually explicit content

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
OnlyFans is getting out of the pornography business.

The company will prohibit users from posting any sexually explicit conduct, starting in October. Creators will still be allowed to post nude photos and videos, provided they're consistent with OnlyFans' policy, the company said Thursday.

The changes are needed because of mounting pressure from banking partners and payment providers, according to the company.
 
Click to expand...
Troonologist PhD said:
Different groups of jews hate each other almost as much as they do the goyim.
Click to expand...
If not more-so, given how many UltraOrthos outside Israel are explicitly against that place's existence. That said, people tend to forget that tribalism extends all the way down to the family next door. UltraOrtho communities are filled with backstabbing and power plays.
 
Snekposter said:
If not more-so, given how many UltraOrthos outside Israel are explicitly against that place's existence. That said, people tend to forget that tribalism extends all the way down to the family next door. UltraOrtho communities are filled with backstabbing and power plays.
Click to expand...
That's probably true of Globalist Elite jews. Just based on the way they act they probably feel their tribe is the Globalists, goyim and all.
 
Troonologist PhD said:
That's probably true of Globalist Elite jews. Just based on the way they act they probably feel their tribe is the Globalists, goyim and all.
Click to expand...
Pretty much. As the saying goes, "Its a big club, and you ain't in it." You don't need to be a Jew to be a rootless cosmopolitan, as we've seen from so many people in the Uniparty.
 
What were these bitches expecting? To be making Onlyfans "content" for the rest of their lives? At some point the gravy train was going to end, whether it's this or the ravages of time or some other third thing, it was going to end. If these whores were barely paying their rent to the point were any drop in income is enough to put them out in the street then they weren't make enough money to put all their eggs in Onlyfans basket. If they were raking in the cash and they are still renting or have no savings then they aren't just slags they're stupid slags.
 
I'm already seeing alternatives pop up. I've seen a social media link to the domain fans.ly that redirects to fansly.com - a domain that's existed since 2014 and seems to be some sort of OF alternative based on what I found through Web Sniffer:


One of the fansly meta tags:
<meta name="description" content="Interact with your fans today and start selling content. Sign up today and make a free account.">

We'll see how long this look-alike site remains a viable alternative before the banks go after it for the same reasons they targets OnlyFans.
 
The Door said:
Like a virus, they will find new communities to infect. Just like how the refugees of tumblr spread their repulsive philosophies.
Click to expand...
True but your average wage slave to "sex worker" individual might be devestated by this since I doubt any of the others will have the same amount of traffic or give the same amount of money back to them as Onlyfans did. I think Onlyfans only took 20% compared to other sites. Veteran sex workers are used to this kinda thing so they probably didn't put their eggs in one basket like the normies did. There will be a lot popping up and it'll probably be difficult to choose which one is the best for them. And those sites will have to deal with banks and payment processors as well. They might end up in hot water like pornhub did previously and now Onlyfans.
 
I don't get it- OF already have a virtual monopoly on the lucrative business of cam-whores. But now they want to just give away that monopoly (which some other company will take over now, and make buttloads of $$$), in order to try to squeeze into a field that Patreon already monopolizes? Even though a half-dozen competitors to Patreon already exist, most fail within months, and best-case scenario, they barely scrape by, in Patreon's shadow?

It makes no sense. It's like if Twitter gave up it's dominance as a mobile, text-based app, in order to start competing with Youtube. It's snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Porn or not, giving up a lucrative niche that you totally dominate, is idiotic. And trying to move into another niche, which is already locked down tight by some other huge, well-known company, is even dumber.
 
I just saw this on social media. If true, I wonder what changed.

cap-onlyfans-change.png

Post #1:
Thank you to everyone for making your voices heard.

We have secured assurances necessary to support our diverse creator community and have suspended the planned October 1 police change.

OnlyFans stands for inclusion and we will continue to provide a home for all creators.

Post #2:
An official communication to creators will be emailed shortly.
 
Kiwi Lime Pie said:
I just saw this on social media. If true, I wonder what changed.

View attachment 2480000

Post #1:
Thank you to everyone for making your voices heard.

We have secured assurances necessary to support our diverse creator community and have suspended the planned October 1 police change.

OnlyFans stands for inclusion and we will continue to provide a home for all creators.

Post #2:
An official communication to creators will be emailed shortly.
Click to expand...
Perhaps OF promised to start checking for child porn and trafficking like they were supposed to from the start.
 
Enjoy_the_Soylence said:
Soooo are they putting in a strict ID verification process to weed out illegal content, or are they just going to kick the can down the road until they get arrested?
Click to expand...
That and they likely cut a deal to rat. Open the books to all investigators for any reason. Expect a massive TOS change with the complete removal of all mention of securing private data or communications.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom