Opinion Only Biden Can Save Israel Now - Our Greatest Ally™©®, etc.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
NY Times / https://archive.is/j0i3o

Only Biden Can Save Israel Now​

israel01.png
Dear President Biden:

In October 1973, the armies of Egypt and Syria launched a surprise pincer attack on Israel. As the Israeli Army fell low on ammunition, your predecessor Richard Nixon ordered a massive airlift of weaponry that helped to save the only Jewish democracy from being destroyed from the outside.

Fifty years later, Mr. President, this Jewish democracy urgently needs another airlift to save it from being destroyed from the inside. It needs an urgent resupply of hard truths — something only you can provide.

And what are those truths? That if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues trying to ram through a bill that would strip Israel’s Supreme Court of its most important legal authority — to check extreme appointments or decisions of Israel’s political echelon — and do so without a semblance of national consensus, it will fracture Israel’s military and undermine not only shared values between the U.S. and Israel but also vital U.S. interests.

Mr. President, when we met last Tuesday and you gave me your very measured statement urging Netanyahu not to “rush” this legislation through without “the broadest possible consensus” — which he so clearly does not have — it came as an electric shock to the Israeli political system, dominating the news for several days.

It was such a shock because a vast majority of Israelis believe — rightly — that you are a true friend and that your advice came from the heart.

But I’m afraid this Israeli government needs another dose of your tough love — not just from your heart but from the heart of U.S. strategic interests as well.

Because Netanyahu is plowing ahead despite your urgings. Despite a warning from more than 1,100 Israeli Air Force pilots and technicians that they will not fly for a dictatorship. Despite an open letter signed by dozens of former top security officials, including former heads of the Israel Defense Forces, Mossad, Shin Bet and police beseeching the prime minister to stop.

Despite Israel’s top business forum warning of “irreversible and destructive consequences on the Israeli economy.” Despite fears that this could eventually fracture unit cohesion in the base of the Israeli Army. And despite a remarkable, largely spontaneous five-day march by everyday Israelis from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, the likes of which had never happened before.
israel02.png
Protesters in Tel Aviv on Saturday.Credit...Jack Guez/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

If I may suggest, Mr. President, what is needed is that your secretary of state, your secretary of defense, your Treasury secretary, your commerce secretary, your secretary of agriculture, your U.S. trade representative, your attorney general, your C.I.A. director and your Joint Chiefs call their Israeli counterparts today and let them know that if Netanyahu moves ahead — without a consensus, fracturing Israeli society and its military — it will not only undermine the shared values between our two countries but also do serious damage to our own strategic interests in the Middle East.

And U.S. interests are very much our business. Because as the Knesset moves to vote on this issue on Monday, something very important could break in Israel and in our relationship with Israel. And once it’s gone, it will never come back.

I hope that it is not already too late.

What American interests are at stake? It should be obvious to every U.S. policymaker by now that Netanyahu’s cabinet, one that you described as one of the most “extreme” you’ve ever encountered, has its mind set on two dismantling projects.

One is to dismantle the power of the Supreme Court to rein in this government’s extreme agenda, and the other is to dismantle the Oslo peace process and its road map for a two-state solution, in order to pave the way for a unilateral Israeli annexation of the West Bank. Oslo has been a cornerstone of America’s Middle East policy since 1993.

These twin dismantlings are interconnected: the Jewish supremacists in Netanyahu’s cabinet need to get the Supreme Court out of the way in order to carry out their plans to annex the West Bank. Such a move could easily destabilize Jordan, as it would likely push more and more Palestinians there and change its fragile demographic balance. Jordan is the most important buffer state in the region for the U.S., which operates from Jordanian territory, in collaboration with Jordan, to deal with U.S. security threats from Syria and western Iraq, where ISIS forces continue to operate.

At the same time, Mr. President, you are wrestling with one of the biggest decisions ever involving U.S. strategy in the Middle East: whether to meet Saudi Arabia’s requests for a formal security guarantee from America, for a U.S.-overseen civilian nuclear program and for access to some of the most advanced U.S. arms. In return for this, Saudi Arabia would normalize its relations with Israel (provided that Israel makes some concessions to the Palestinians) and limit its collaboration with China.

It would be both difficult and unfortunate to get such a deal through Congress without strong support from Democrats in the Senate. As you know, Mr. President, Netanyahu and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman are two of the least popular world leaders among progressive Democrats, especially considering the way Netanyahu, over the past decade, moved to make support for Israel a Republican cause and spurned the embrace of secular American Jews for that of Christian evangelicals instead.

In short, winning enough support among Democrats to forge this complex deal with Saudi Arabia will be a huge lift on a good day; it will be even harder if Netanyahu neuters the Israeli Supreme Court — undermining our shared values of an independent judiciary — and moves ahead with plans to annex the West Bank. And without you as president, such a deal would be virtually impossible, because very few Democrats in the Senate would support it if it was pushed by a Republican president. In short, the window for this deal is small.

Moreover, in 2016 you and President Barack Obama signed a 10-year, $38 billion agreement to enhance Israel’s military. Are we supposed to just sit back and watch silently while that military — which we have made such a huge investment in to amplify our power projection in the Middle East — fractures over efforts to restrict the power of the Israeli Supreme Court? That would be a disaster for us and for Israel, which has real enemies like Iran and Hezbollah on its doorstep.

Also, we can already see that the extreme behavior of this Israeli government in expanding settlements in the West Bank is beginning to damage the historic relations forged by President Donald Trump between Israel and the U.A.E., Bahrain and Morocco with the Abraham Accords. All three Arab countries have been forced to cool their diplomatic ties with Israel.

Mr. President, there is no institution in any democracy that can’t be improved, and that applies to Israel’s Supreme Court. There have been complaints from the center right that the Israeli high court manifested an occasional judicial overreach in the past. But between 2015 and 2019, Likud governments successfully shepherded the appointments of four conservative justices to the Supreme Court — under the current system that Netanyahu wants to scrap. It shows you how bogus this whole “judicial reform” really is.

There is a huge difference between making the Israeli Supreme Court more politically and ethnically inclusive and making this Israeli government immune from its scrutiny — especially in a system in which the high court in Israel is the only real check on executive overreach.

And the latter is what Netanyahu’s coalition is up to, and it is the latter that undermines not just our shared values with Israel but also our own strategic interests, which we are entitled — indeed we are required — to defend.
 
So basically the Nationalist Jews are trying to outjew the Internationalist Jews and the Internationalist Jews who founded Israel want the Democrats to support them which they are already doing and if the plan fails they’ll flee to Ukraine.
 
If I may suggest, Mr. President, what is needed is that your secretary of state, your secretary of defense, your Treasury secretary, your commerce secretary, your secretary of agriculture, your U.S. trade representative, your attorney general, your C.I.A. director and your Joint Chiefs call their Israeli counterparts today and let them know that if Netanyahu moves ahead — without a consensus, fracturing Israeli society and its military — it will not only undermine the shared values between our two countries but also do serious damage to our own strategic interests in the Middle East.
All that imploring and typing "Mr. President" and you want Biden to do what amounts to the geopolitical equivalent of "don't do this pretty please"?
 
"Dear America, please could we have some of that political interference"?
 
So basically the Nationalist Jews are trying to outjew the Internationalist Jews and the Internationalist Jews
I think so. It also appears Benny N. is not doing anything that violates Israeli law. He has the votes to make the changes he wants in the Knesset and is (apparently) going to do so. Friedman, at any rate, never claims otherwise. Only that he doesn't like it.

The fact that the changes are made via votes from the parasitical useless eater ultra-Orthodox? Oh, well. Their votes count as much as anybody else's, and every day they grow closer to a plurality of the population, since they're the ones having babies, and getting a nice set of kosher gimmiedats for each baby the yentas squeeze out.

Pretty much what this commenter said
1690198587578.png

edit:
Can you imagine if that headline was actually true, and how fucked Israel would be?
I think what amuses me most about the article is the way it implies Israel is a client state of the USA, rather than the reality that it is the other way around.
 
All that imploring and typing "Mr. President" and you want Biden to do what amounts to the geopolitical equivalent of "don't do this pretty please"?
exactly it simply comes down to the author saying biden needs to tell israel to prety pleas enot do something. and the thing is israel will not care. why should they? unless there is a serious threat to end foreign aid and to have the us no longer go along with israel and protect them, then israel has nothing to fear.
 
"To save Israeli Democracy, we must make it entirely dependent on a foreign country to decide its politics".
I'd like to throw whoever wrote this article to the gas chamber myself.
 
In October 1973, the armies of Egypt and Syria launched a surprise pincer attack on Israel. As the Israeli Army fell low on ammunition, your predecessor Richard Nixon ordered a massive airlift of weaponry that helped to save the only Jewish democracy from being destroyed from the outside.
During Yom Kippur War Golda Meir literally threatened to nuke the arabs and blackmailed Nixon into giving weapons. It really is illustrative case, Israel is like the abusive lover of the United States, and nowadays the Israelis gaslight the burgers and cite the war as an example of "US and Israel being greatest allies", even though the kikes had to resort to blackmail.

Sorry, I know this isn't so relevant to the thread, but just an interesting fact I wanted to share.
 
Why is support for Israel even still part of US geopolitics? US and western involvement in the middle east is over and was beset with enough failures that you'd need something major to happen to get public opinion behind getting involved in the region again. Israel is a big mature country with an armed forces that can go toe-to-toe with any of it's neighbours, it doesn't even need the US anymore.
 
I think so. It also appears Benny N. is not doing anything that violates Israeli law. He has the votes to make the changes he wants in the Knesset and is (apparently) going to do so. Friedman, at any rate, never claims otherwise. Only that he doesn't like it.

The fact that the changes are made via votes from the parasitical useless eater ultra-Orthodox? Oh, well. Their votes count as much as anybody else's, and every day they grow closer to a plurality of the population, since they're the ones having babies, and getting a nice set of kosher gimmiedats for each baby the yentas squeeze out.

Pretty much what this commenter said
View attachment 5230444

edit:

I think what amuses me most about the article is the way it implies Israel is a client state of the USA, rather than the reality that it is the other way around.
There was reason why amerimutts in the beginning allowed only landowners to vote . If you screeech muh democracy in the current form that includes niggercattle that abuses the welfare system.
 
"Dear America, please could we have some of that political interference"?
When Samuel grew old, he appointed his sons as Israel’s leaders...but his sons did not follow his ways. They turned aside after dishonest gain and accepted bribes and perverted justice.
So all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah.
They said to him, “You are old, and your sons do not follow your ways; now appoint a king to lead us, such as all the other nations have.”
But when they said, “Give us a king to lead us,” this displeased Samuel; so he prayed to the LORD.
And the LORD told him: “Listen to all that the people are saying to you; it is not you they have rejected, but they have rejected me as their king.
As they have done from the day I brought them up out of Egypt until this day, forsaking me and serving other gods, so they are doing to you.
-- 1 Samuel 8 1-8 NIV
....I dunno, I just felt like that was appropriate to the situation.
 
JEW FIGHT! JEW FIGHT! JEW FIGHT!

The Jewish Civil War between Bolsheviks, Zionists and Orthodox believers enters it's 12th decade with no sign of stopping.
 
Seems like a bunch of typical shitlib exaggerations article seething that they cannot control Benji boy. Benji explained his side on the Lex Friedman podcast, and I tend to believe him.
It might seem difficult for people like us outside Israel to comprehend their disagreements "but I thought they were all just sipping on goy juice and manning the Rothschild banks", but it does turn out that Israel is a rather politically diverse place, with a lot of cohesion when it comes to national and tribal survival, and this inner political struggle is not that, so they fight.
Who cares, most non-authoritarian nations where you can protest get through this sort of shit, it's not a tragedy. Probably really low on the US prio list right now.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom