Women who still fall for the "race first" trap and think that white men are better than other races of men are coping hard. There is no magical and safer demographic of men. They are all male regardless of race, religion or sexuality and will prioritize maleness over women. Always.
White men have the capability to be depraved as well, but the difference is that they are more likely generally to consider the consequences of their actions. I agree with the idea that a lot of men are kept in line solely through laws, like there's undoubtedly a lot of men (regardless of race) who would fuck children if the age of consent was set lower legally, and there's a lot of men who go after 18-year-olds because that's the lowest legally they're allowed to go after. But men with lower IQs are more likely to just not give a fuck and go after kids well below the age of consent anyway, even if it ruins their entire life, because they don't think ahead and rely more on caveman instincts.
It's not a coincidence that many pedophilic men end up being mentally disabled, just look at the average predator on To Catch A Predator or any of the pedo lolcow threads on this site. Africans have been proven to be more deficient in planning skills, which you can just observe with how trillions of dollars have gone toward African aid, and they still live in mud huts in the 21st century. There is a trend in black crime being higher per capita compared to white crime in America. Africans also have a higher likelihood of having the 2-repeat variant MAOA gene, which is linked to aggression.
Inbreeding is also undeniably linked to IQ and behavior, and that goes for inbreeding of any race. King Charles II of Spain was nicknamed "The Mad King" because inbreeding resulted in him having numerous mental/physical conditions, including the infamous "Habsburg Jaw". So yes, religion does play a role, because certain religions, like Islam, still commonly practice inbreeding. It's no coincidence that 80% of the grooming gang members in the UK were Pakistani, because they come from a country where inbreeding is practiced by more than half of the population. Lower IQ people also find it harder to assimilate into a first-world country and find well-paying jobs, and that also leads them to turn to crime to survive. Even immigrant women were more likely to commit crime compared to native white people in European countries, which makes sense considering they may have families to feed and not enough money, so they resort to things like stealing.
To say that being a single women traveling in Poland (a country that is 99% white) and a single woman traveling in Nigeria pose the exact same level of risk because "men are men regardless of race" is so obviously untrue. Yeah, it's possible to still be raped and murdered in Poland, but the per 100k violent
crime rate of Poland is 0.67, whereas the per 100k violent
crime rate in Nigeria is 21.74. It's not about "socioeconomic cultural factors" either, because these same demographics when moved to a first-world country, or when they're a 2nd or 3rd-generation, still are more likely to commit crimes. African Americans have been in America and been freed for a long time now, yet they're still more likely to commit crime. Asian American immigrants that have come here within the past 20 years don't commit as much crime. So it's obvious biology is a factor.
Just because people commit crime in first-world countries too or just because you know a black math prodigy doesn't refute the general observation that third-world countries have lower IQs and higher predisposition toward crime. "Not all blacks" is the same as "Not all men". But our Western society is based on the idea of meritocracy and "we're all the same" inclusion, so no one is allowed to openly discuss this.
Edit: Another piece of evidence against "we're all the same regardless of skin color" is evident with the "No Child Left Behind Act" which aimed to bridge the gap in achievement between black students and white students in America. Ironically, it ended up only further making the gap apparent and not solving the issue. The richest black families still scored very similarly on the SAT to the poorest white families, proving "socioeconomic factors" are not the sole explanation, if even rich African Americans still under-perform compared to white students. Asians still have better academic achievement, even if born in America and educated in a shitty American school, proving that it's not solely just foreign education that's better.