Opinion NYT: Why Republicans Are Surging

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Why Republicans Are Surging
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By David Brooks
2022-10-20 23:00:09GMT

brooks01.jpg

Democrats had a golden summer. The Dobbs decision led to a surge of voter registrations. Voters handed Democrats a string of sweet victories in unlikely places — Alaska and Kansas, and good news in upstate New York.

The momentum didn’t survive the fall.

Over the past month or so, there’s been a rumbling across the land, and the news is not good for Team Blue. In the latest New York Times/Siena College poll 49 percent of likely voters said they planned to vote for a Republican for Congress, and 45 percent said they planned to vote for a Democrat. Democrats held a one-point lead last month.

The poll contained some eye-popping numbers. Democrats were counting on abortion rights to be a big issue, gaining them broad support among female voters. It doesn’t seem to be working. Over the past month, the gender gap, which used to favor Democrats, has evaporated. In September, women who identified as independent voters favored Democrats by 14 points. Now they favor Republicans by 18 percentage points.

Republicans lead among independents overall by 10 points.

To understand how the parties think the campaign is going, look at where they are spending their money. As Henry Olsen noted in The Washington Post last week, Democrats are pouring money into House districts that should be safe — places that Joe Biden won by double digits in 2020. Politico’s election forecast, for example, now rates the races in California’s 13th District and Oregon’s Sixth District as tossups. Two years ago, according to Politico, he won those areas by 11 and 14 points.

If Republicans are competitive in places like that, we’re probably looking at a red wave election that will enable them to easily take back the House and maybe the Senate.

So how should Democrats interpret these trends? There’s a minimalist interpretation: Midterms are usually hard for the president’s party, and this one was bound to be doubly hard because of global inflation.

I take a more medium to maximalist view. I’d say recent events have exposed some serious weaknesses in the party’s political approach:

It’s hard to win consistently if voters don’t trust you on the top issue. In a recent AP-NORC poll, voters trust Republicans to do a better job handling the economy, by 39 percent to 29 percent. Over the past two years, Democrats have tried to build a compelling economic platform by making massive federal investments in technology, infrastructure and child welfare. But those policies do not seem to be moving voters. As The Times’s Jim Tankersley has reported, Democratic candidates in competitive Senate races are barely talking about the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, which included direct payments to citizens.

I thought the child tax credit expansion would be massively popular and could help create a Democratic governing majority. It turned out to be less popular than many anticipated, and there was little hue and cry when it expired. Maybe voters have a built-in uneasiness about income redistribution and federal spending.

Democrats have a crime problem. More than three-quarters of voters say that violent crime is a major problem in the United States, according to a recent Politico/Morning Consult poll. Back in the 1990s, Bill Clinton and Joe Biden worked hard to give the Democrats credibility on this issue. Many Democrats have walked away from policies the party embraced then, often for good reasons. But they need to find another set of policies that will make the streets safer.

Democrats have not won back Hispanics. In 2016, Donald Trump won 28 percent of the Hispanic vote. In 2020, it was up to 38 percent. This year, as William A. Galston noted in The Wall Street Journal, recent surveys suggest that Republicans will once again win about 34 to 38 percent of the Hispanic vote. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis is leading the Democrat Charlie Crist by 16 points among Hispanics likely to vote.

The Jan. 6 committee and the warnings about MAGA fascism didn’t change minds. That committee’s work has been morally and legally important. But Trump’s favorability rating is pretty much where it was at the committee’s first public hearing. In the Times poll, Trump is roughly tied with Biden in a theoretical 2024 rematch. According to Politico, less than 2 percent of broadcast TV spending in House races has been devoted to Jan. 6 ads.

It could be that voters are overwhelmed by immediate concerns, like food prices. It could be that voters have become so cynical and polarized that scandal and corruption just don’t move people much anymore. This year Herschel Walker set some kind of record for the most scandals in one political season. He is still in a competitive race with Senator Raphael Warnock in Georgia.

The Republicans may just have a clearer narrative. The Trumpified G.O.P. deserves to be a marginalized and disgraced force in American life. But I’ve been watching the campaign speeches by people like Kari Lake, the Republican candidate for governor in Arizona. G.O.P. candidates are telling a very clear class/culture/status war narrative in which common-sense Americans are being assaulted by elite progressives who let the homeless take over the streets, teach sex ed to 5-year-olds, manufacture fake news, run woke corporations, open the border and refuse to do anything about fentanyl deaths and the sorts of things that affect regular people.

In other words, candidates like Lake wrap a dozen different issues into one coherent class war story. And it seems to be working. In late July she was trailing her opponent by seven points. Now she’s up by about half a point.
 
"We keep raping their kids, trying to coerce them into accepting gender destruction, tearing down every value they have, spitting on them for not taking the knee for 14% of the population, giving us most of their money, devaluing the money they have left, removing their freedom of travel, dictating to them what they can and can't say anywhere...why won't these stupid sons of bitches do what we say???"
 
The hilarious transparency that January 6th was worse in the eyes of the elite than when a bunch of bugmen died is not lost on me.
 
Maybe if the left wasn't so addicted to gender insanity, hating faiths, and holding actual change hostage to get minorities to vote: THEN maybe they'd get the Latino vote back. Right now they'd rather get called beaner once in a while than have some blue ghoul hair call them LatinX and try and troon out their kids.
 
Maybe if the left wasn't so addicted to gender insanity, hating faiths, and holding actual change hostage to get minorities to vote: THEN maybe they'd get the Latino vote back. Right now they'd rather get called beaner once in a while than have some blue ghoul hair call them LatinX and try and troon out their kids.
I have literally never heard “Latinx” outside of a college classroom or good-natured ribbing between friends.
Slight PL: The most stereotypical “Latinx” alike I know still insists on being referred to as “Latino”.
 
In other words, candidates like Lake wrap a dozen different issues into one coherent class war story. And it seems to be working.
And as always with these articles, you have to get the end to finally figure out what they're bitching about. The NYT is mad the Republicans are successfully pointing out them as the cause of society's ills and problems.
 
And as always with these articles, you have to get the end to finally figure out what they're bitching about. The NYT is mad the Republicans are successfully pointing out them as the cause of society's ills and problems.
Or rather, the Republicans found a way to be hip, energetic and funny, something the DNC had no contingency for, as all their gain-of-function research into Republican Candidates assured them this could never happen, they just didn't have the genetic makeup to be anything but old, tired, miserable Bible-thumpers.

They still think you average Republican is closer to Strom Thurmond, in both ethics and appearance, than they are.
 
Or rather, the Republicans found a way to be hip, energetic and funny, something the DNC had no contingency for, as all their gain-of-function research into Republican Candidates assured them this could never happen, they just didn't have the genetic makeup to be anything but old, tired, miserable Bible-thumpers.

They still think you average Republican is closer to Strom Thurmond, in both ethics and appearance, than they are.
Which is ironic considering the number of conservative anime avatar fags I've seen around, not just on the Farms but elsewhere.
 
The Trumpified G.O.P. deserves to be a marginalized and disgraced force in American life.
This mindset is exactly why people want to vote for them, Mr. The seams in Obama's pants made my micropeen harder than it's ever been
 
Why does the American MSM side with the Democrats anyway?
Journos show up out of college with this belief they are supposed to “change the world” and shit.
The Democrats want change. What change? Well, the status quo is bad. This attitude reaches all the way to the editors and everyone else.

Also, ((wealthy interests)) are able to exercise some pull. If I was a large business, my ass would be voting “D” just so they pass their legislation to drive up the cost of doing business. I am entrenched, I can take it. My small business competitors can’t.
 
Why does the American MSM side with the Democrats anyway?
Because the people you meet in journalism class are the most smug, elitist faggots you could ever hope to meet.

Every one of them thinks they're going to go after the Right and be the next person to break something like Watergate. They're convinced they're smarter than everyone out there. Only they can see the real truth and they're the only ones that can expose all the corruption.

They know and are taught there is no such thing as unbiased journalism, so it's OK to be a smug cunty faggot who would benefit from a punch in the mouth . See, it's not them, it's the WORLD.

Their press pass lets them walk around war zones without getting shot, lets them talk to terrorists without being beheaded, lets them talk to politicians without the secret service beating the shit out of them.

THEY have the power, with cancel culture just making it even more powerful. They can ruin your life and career with a single article.

And they ALL have an axe to grind.

They're smug, unlikable, bullying faggots, and every single one of them are sex pests.
 
Back
Top Bottom