EU Nuremberg for terror - For those who have not realised it so far, we are at war

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
brusselssignal.eu / archive

Nuremberg for terror: ‘For those who have not realised it so far, we are at war’
Konstantinos Bogdanos
15 December 2025

According to the dominant narrative, in Nuremberg, the West put on trial those who attempted to destroy its foundations of liberty and democracy. Leaving aside the fact that such an argument crashes into a brick wall called the Soviet Union, let us just reflect on the idea -and fast-forward to 2025. How many more Sydneys do we need until we realise that those who have brought upon us such evil must not only be stopped, but also punished?

Jihadists did not just appear out of thin air. A dark web of top politicians, entrepreneurs, journalists and NGOs has now turned our countries into an invasion setting and our lives into an ordeal of constant harassment and threat. Islamism has been abundantly imported by idiotic progressives and immoral money makers.

Did all these bigshots, who opened the borders and lectured us while setting up the big business behind illegal immigration, actually have the right to make such deep changes to our daily lives? Did they get any mandate from anyone that entitled them to turn urban and rural areas, public services and transport into survival courses? Were they instructed by voters to dig deep into our pockets, smash wages and destroy budgets in order to give handouts to illegals and pay for their welfare?

Nobody asked or permitted those people to topple social structures and pulverise age-long cultural achievements. They never told our mothers, wives and daughters that they would risk harassment on a daily basis, when they were pushing forward their open borders, diversity and inclusion multicultural agenda. The question therefore arises: Are they not responsible for the current state of affairs?

Let us get back to Nuremberg. The architects of evil were then compelled to face the evidence, the verdict and ultimately the consequences. The guiding principle behind the proceedings was unambiguous: Those who orchestrate widespread destruction must be held fully accountable, irrespective of their rank or influence. Does this principle not stand today?

We cannot afford to get used to horror. Yesterday in Sydney gunmen opened fire on families peacefully celebrating Hanukkah. During the same weekend, German police narrowly prevented another disaster in Bavaria: Five Islamists, including an Egyptian imam as the ringleader, were arrested after plotting to drive a vehicle into a crowded Christmas market. Their explicit intention was to inflict maximum casualties on people simply enjoying the festive season.

Such incidents have become too common during the last years. And they are not random or isolated acts of madness. They are the direct and foreseeable consequences of long-term policy decisions taken at the highest levels. A powerful elite has deliberately transformed stable Western nations into zones of uncontrolled mass invasion and escalating cultural conflict, where Islamist attacks are now commonplace.

The most prominent enablers must bear the primary responsibility. National leaders who signed global migration compacts while consciously disregarding security assessments. Ministers who routinely dismissed legitimate concerns as racism or xenophobia. Media tycoons who systematically vilified critics as far-right extremists. NGO chiefs who profited substantially from facilitating trafficking networks. They are not innocent.

Their collective choices have created genuine dystopias across the West. Streets that were once safe now require constant vigilance from ordinary citizens. Jewish communities need armed protection merely to hold religious gatherings. Christmas markets increasingly resemble fortified positions rather than places of celebration. Churches are being vandalised or burnt down. Family neighbourhoods have turned into no-go areas. Unpredictable violence lurks everywhere.

Punishment must therefore begin at the very top. Not through mob justice, but through rigorous and transparent legal processes. Prosecute gross negligence directly linked to loss of life. Seize assets accumulated through facilitation of illegal trafficking. Strip citizenship from dual-national agitators proven to incite hatred or violence. Ban all funding of institutions that preach intolerance. But even this is not enough.

The chief architects deserve to face courts before anyone else. Those who publicly celebrated theories of “great replacement” or “enrichment” while steadfastly refusing to acknowledge repeated integration failures. Who directed billions into “welcome” programmes even as terror incidents rose year after year. Who condemned border control as immoral while surrounding their own residences with private security.

National conservative parties and leaders on the rise must no longer settle for simply stopping the harm being done. Neither is it sufficient to promise to reverse the trend, try to fix wrongs and rebuild communities. A new priority emerges: Punish the guilty. Hunt down the mastermind enablers of a crime that demands justice.

Nuremberg correctly targeted the planners and organisers rather than merely the low-level executors. Today’s equivalent planners occupy seats in parliaments, corporate and media boardrooms, NGO leadership echelons. They design and impose the chaos, then express shock when the inevitable consequences materialise. They must finally answer for the lives lost and societies fractured under their direction.

Impunity guarantees only further escalation. Every Sydney massacre and every narrowly-foiled Christmas market plot serves to embolden radicals while the ones truly responsible escape all consequences. Justice now demands immediate and resolute action. Halt uncontrolled inflows without further delay. Deport individuals proven incompatible with peaceful coexistence. Bring the most prominent enablers to public trial. Restore genuine order, sovereignty and public safety before the point of no return.

For those who have not realised it so far, we are at war. Habitual means and methods are no longer effective. Fear needs to be instilled into the heart of the enemy. And the enemy is not just those fanatics of the “religion of peace” who have infiltrated our files. Against us stands a fifth column of criminals, some of whom occupy the highest ranks. Those last ones deserve to pay for their deeds in an exemplary manner. As simple as that.
 
Did all these bigshots, who opened the borders and lectured us while setting up the big business behind illegal immigration, actually have the right to make such deep changes to our daily lives? Did they get any mandate from anyone that entitled them to turn urban and rural areas, public services and transport into survival courses? Were they instructed by voters to dig deep into our pockets, smash wages and destroy budgets in order to give handouts to illegals and pay for their welfare?
Yes they did. Nearly every act of western governments to replace their natives was done with some support from those same natives. Like Boomers in the US wanting illegals for cheap labor. Or boomers in Europe buying the lie that refugees were needed to prop up pension plans. I agree that letting the invasions happen was a mistake, but we should be honest about how they came to be.
 
Yes they did. Nearly every act of western governments to replace their natives was done with some support from those same natives. Like Boomers in the US wanting illegals for cheap labor. Or boomers in Europe buying the lie that refugees were needed to prop up pension plans. I agree that letting the invasions happen was a mistake, but we should be honest about how they came to be.
The Tories were elected in 2010 under the promise to reduce immigration. Instead, it increased.

People voted to leave the EU in 2016 because they thought this would lead to reduced immigration. Immigration increased again under the Boriswave.

Labour were elected in 2024 in large part because they promised to actually do something about immigration. They have done barely anything, with anything substantial being blocked by judicial activism while the government wrings its hands.

The public keeps voting for less immigration. "Let's flood the country with millions of people from Pakistan" was never something that appealed to voters. Politicians just did it anyway.
 
The public keeps voting for less immigration. "Let's flood the country with millions of people from Pakistan" was never something that appealed to voters. Politicians just did it anyway.
We can reach a compromise... by turning those Pakis into voters voting for more Pakis and Sharia law.
 
For those who have not realised it so far, we are at war. Habitual means and methods are no longer effective. Fear needs to be instilled into the heart of the enemy. And the enemy is not just those fanatics of the “religion of peace” who have infiltrated our files. Against us stands a fifth column of criminals, some of whom occupy the highest ranks.
The reason this rhetoric sounds so toothless from anyone at this point, irrespective of their intentions or personal political goals, is that from an outside perspective the ship has clearly sailed.

You're at war now?

The Bataclan Massacre was a decade ago. Ten men permitted to exist inside the EU managed to, between about 2100 and 0100, kill one hundred and thirty and injure four hundred and sixteen. Some of the dead were disemboweled, decapitated and castrated.

Suddenly waking up in a moment of clarity and saying "wait, we've been at war all along?" is Three Stooges-type physical comedy made to be presented with a laugh track.
 
The Bataclan Massacre was a decade ago. Ten men permitted to exist inside the EU managed to, between about 2100 and 0100, kill one hundred and thirty and injure four hundred and sixteen. Some of the dead were disemboweled, decapitated and castrated.
That should have been the turning point where we'd see citizen mobs kicking in the doors of mosques, hanging every imam and able-bodied man, then burning them to the ground and planting a nice big sign depicting Mohammed getting turned out by a camel. The fact that it hasn't been happening every couple months for the last decade should tell anybody that it's clear nobody is going to start lifting a finger towards the muzzies. Normal people (myself included) are stuck bitching within the confines of the law (thank fuck for 1A), because there's no possible way to coordinate without the government exterminating you. At the very least in the US we largely have 2A on an individual level, but for the poor fuckers stuck in the UK and Europe? They're lucky to be able to defend each other with their hands without being fined while watching the sandniggers get off for free. It won't stop without extremely liberal use of guillotines and nooses, but, I don't see it happening.
 
That should have been the turning point where we'd see citizen mobs kicking in the doors of mosques, hanging every imam and able-bodied man, then burning them to the ground and planting a nice big sign depicting Mohammed getting turned out by a camel. The fact that it hasn't been happening every couple months for the last decade should tell anybody that it's clear nobody is going to start lifting a finger towards the muzzies. Normal people (myself included) are stuck bitching within the confines of the law (thank fuck for 1A), because there's no possible way to coordinate without the government exterminating you. At the very least in the US we largely have 2A on an individual level, but for the poor fuckers stuck in the UK and Europe? They're lucky to be able to defend each other with their hands without being fined while watching the sandniggers get off for free. It won't stop without extremely liberal use of guillotines and nooses, but, I don't see it happening.
Didn't the cops try to arrest that one guy who tackled the knife wielding jihadi who once freed from the arms of the man holding him, proceeded to thank the officer by perforating his neck?
 
Back
Top Bottom