🐱 No lives matter

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


Among the many misconceptions about white identity politics is the tendency to believe that truth, reason or—at the very least—human decency can bring about change. In the 402 years since European colonizers first began outlining the political and legal parameters of this Caucasian utopian experiment in democracy, too many people (myself included) have tried to dismantle the absurdity of white supremacy with facts, logic and reason.

I have personally whittled my fingers to the bone trying to make it all make sense. In an attempt to counterbalance the narrative against critical race theory, I have foolishly used the actual definition of CRT. When someone asks, “But what about Black-on-Black crime?” I’ve pulled out statistics, census data and peer-reviewed sociology studies. I stupidly assumed that white people would stop saying “all lives matter” once they understood the disparities in policing, sentencing and the entire criminal justice system.

So when I heard reports that a gunman walked into a Uvalde, Texas, school and opened fire on dozens of elementary school children, I knew that people who believe in things would immediately begin ranting about firearm manufacturers, the National Rifle Association and the Republican Party. Even worse, I knew that the alphabet soup of death dealers that includes the NRA, the GOP and Y.P. Pull would start spewing nonsense about arming teachers, Second Amendment rights and jack-booted thugs coming to confiscate their guns and their freedoms. While I could have easily written about this, I have written those pieces time and time and time and timeagain.

I blame white people.

While that might seem like the perfect example of reverse racism, we have already established that logic doesn’t matter. We know that states with strong firearm laws experience fewer gun-related deaths. Anyone can use a secret tool called the internet and find out that good guys with guns don’t stop bad guys with guns. Everyone understands that the NRA is funded by, and represents, the interests of gun manufacturers, not regular gun owners. A person with a limited IQ could guess that guns are the most common tool of murderers in America. In fact, most Americans favor common sense gun reform, so the problem is not that people don’t know the facts.

The problem is white people.

It’s not Republicans—most Republicans support background checks and restricting access to guns for people with mental illness. It’s not the NRA—most gun owners don’t belong to the NRA. It’s not the Second Amendment—no serious politician has proposed doing away with all guns. The reason every third-grader in America has to remember what to do when an actual monster comes to kill them is that, unlike the vast majority of every other racial and demographic in America, most white people don’t want stricter gun laws.



And, before you wonder why I think white people don’t care about children being murdered, that’s not what I’m saying. In fact, it’s quite the opposite. I think white people don’t want children being murdered, and they oppose restrictions on gun ownership. But, if they have to choose, instead of concluding that they will still be able to purchase a gun if they pass background checks, don’t have mental health issues and can endure an agonizing waiting period, they choose the warm comfort of whiteness. For them, their supposed “freedoms” are more important than the lives of everyone else.

And it’s not just guns. Most white people think public schools should teach aboutracial inequality. Most white people think abortion should be legal in most cases. Most white people think the rich should pay higher taxes and that police use of force should be reformed. The only way any of these changes will ever happen is through the law. Yet, year in and year out, the majority of white people vote for the party that prevents any of this from happening.


Make it make sense.

They don’t want the coronavirus killing their children, but they support anti-mask, anti-vaccine candidates. They believe that every vote should be counted, but they support laws that suppress Black voters. They believe in freedom of speech and religion, but they also want to ban Muslims, mute gays and demean anyone who doesn’t believe in white Jesus. And, in many cases, they will tell you that they don’t hate trans people, Black people or non-Christians. But, when they have to decide between their privilege and other people’s existence, they will always always always choose whiteness over everything.

This is why I have stopped arguing with white people. I don’t expect them to understand truth or reason. They will argue against government interference while asking their government to regulate vaginas. They’ll rail against identity politics while demonizing immigrants, Muslims and the “gay agenda.” They will manufacture a way to circumvent history, math and science to come up with an opinion that supports whiteness because the literal foundation of this country was built on one inexorable truth.

Nothing matters but whiteness. Everything else can die.

You can’t argue with that logic.
 
Beto O'Rourke definitely has. And I think Eric Swalwell did as well.
And the ones that 'haven't", still don't provide much definition for exactly what they believe should be banned. Now we're to, what, having extra bullets in a mag being more deadly somehow? Like a psycho shooter can't carry more in the case of them being regulated smaller?
 
They believe in freedom of speech and religion, but they also want to ban Muslims, mute gays and demean anyone who doesn’t believe in white Jesus. And, in many cases, they will tell you that they don’t hate trans people, Black people or non-Christians. But, when they have to decide between their privilege and other people’s existence, they will always always always choose whiteness over everything.
What's the negatives here?
 
The reason every third-grader in America has to remember what to do when an actual monster comes to kill them is that, unlike the vast majority of every other racial and demographic in America, most white people don’t want stricter gun laws.
Pretty sure there was a survey that showed the only demographic that overwhelmingly wanted stronger gun control was black women. Not whites, not Hispanics, not Asians, not even black men, just black women, and maybe it's hard to blame them when they have to deal with the kids/grandkids they raise getting gunned down in the inner city.

But the article title is right. No lives matter, but not for the reason the writer thinks. Poor nigga is just a foot-soldier for Y.P. Pull.
 
Nothing matters but whiteness. Everything else can die.

You can’t argue with that logic.
I love this passive aggressive salt

It's like I can see the words sulking and scowling at me from a corner lmao
 
What an excellent string of opinions demonstrating why it is a necessary state of affairs that half a billion guns, especially over one hundred million rifles, are in the possession of private citizens in this ccountry.
 
Nothing matters but whiteness. Everything else can die.
You know, I needed something to etch onto some nonsense part like a dust cover to test my cutting laser. Thanks fren!
lol, take meds Clayton Bigsby:
1653572157451.png
 
The problem is white people.

It’s not Republicans—most Republicans support background checks and restricting access to guns for people with mental illness. It’s not the NRA—most gun owners don’t belong to the NRA. It’s not the Second Amendment—no serious politician has proposed doing away with all guns. The reason every third-grader in America has to remember what to do when an actual monster comes to kill them is that, unlike the vast majority of every other racial and demographic in America, most white people don’t want stricter gun laws.

the problem is white people categorically, but not any of the majority-white institutions that directly deal with gun legislation. solid mental gymnastics act there. the column writer class is really a marvel of narcissism and spaghetti logic
 
They don’t want the coronavirus killing their children, but they support anti-mask, anti-vaccine candidates. They believe that every vote should be counted, but they support laws that suppress Black voters. They believe in freedom of speech and religion, but they also want to ban Muslims, mute gays and demean anyone who doesn’t believe in white Jesus. And, in many cases, they will tell you that they don’t hate trans people, Black people or non-Christians. But, when they have to decide between their privilege and other people’s existence, they will always always always choose whiteness over everything.
"They don’t want the coronavirus killing their children, but they support anti-mask, anti-vaccine candidates."
1., That would be anti-mask, anti-vaccine, and anti lockdown.
2. Not wanting the government to be able to forcible inject you or your kids with drugs against your will, stop your kids from being able to breathe properly and forbid you from working - being against all that is pretty important if you want to protect children.

"They believe that every vote should be counted, but they support laws that suppress Black voters. "
1. Requiring id is basic vote protection and does not suppress black voters. This is self-evident, obvious, common sense.
2. If progressives actually believed that black Americans don't have ids and actually cared about black Americans their real response would have been attempting to get every black American a goddamn id so that they're not you know LEFT ENTIRELY OUTSIDE MODERN SOCIETY, but instead it seems to be 'let's just keep for decades and decades to not provide black Americans with these ids we believe they don't have and otherwise utterly ignore it as an issue'.

"They believe in freedom of speech and religion, but they also want to ban Muslims, mute gays and demean anyone who doesn’t believe in white Jesus."
1. People don't want to ban muslims or mute gays. They want to critique and mock assholes, including assholes in those groups.
2. Freedom of speech allows you to mock and demean anyone. This is good, because assholes hate it, and demeaning and mocking them causes people to be less assholish.
3. Progressives by the way does not want to help the above groups.

"And, in many cases, they will tell you that they don’t hate trans people, Black people or non-Christians."
1. Yeah people keep informing you of the fact but it never seems to get trough your head.

"But, when they have to decide between their privilege and other people’s existence, they will always always always choose whiteness over everything."
1. When progressives say 'whiteness' they mean 'people who disagree with them'.
2. Your existence is not more important than other people's ability to disagree with you. In fact, your existence will be improved if other people can disagree with you. Helps you be less wrong about things.

Nothing matters but whiteness. Everything else can die.

You can’t argue with that logic.


1. Woke progressivism does not work off logic. It works off emotionally charged lies.
 
If being white helps us keep our human right to defend ourselves then I support government subsidized skin bleach to help protect our freedom
 
While that might seem like the perfect example of reverse racism
No, I'd say it's a great example of regular ol' racism. Just admit that you're a racist instead of jumping through hoops to say you aren't.

This is why I have stopped arguing with white people. I don’t expect them to understand truth or reason.
'My arguments keep getting put down with facts and reason, so I just stopped trying and just stay to my echo chamber.'
 
Back
Top Bottom