Nintendo Switch (Currently Plagued) - Here we shit post about the new Nintendo console, The Switch

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Sooo.... this entire argument was.... smashing.

Anyway I'm gonna repeat a question that got overlooked:

Now that it's been awhile and the initial hype/release period has died down, how do Kiwis feel about Tears of the Kingdom (especially vs Breath of the Wild)? And any of you who have posted opinions before, have you re-evaluated the game since then?
As someone who holds up BOTW in high regard, Tears is alright. A great game, but one that doesn't excel at anything and I feel misses the point of BOTW.

What the game does better than BOTW is mostly down to dungeon design and boss variety. The 5 dungeons were more unique this time and the bosses were all different rather than Ganon 4 times. The side quests also got a bit of a bump as there are more multi-part ones. Story content is also quite a bit better, it feels like the Champions are more fleshed out and have more to do.

The problem is that past those, there is not much to say is better, it is either stuff on par or actively worse.

I believe the runes are worse this time around. Ultrahand is an interesting gimmick, and a technical marvel, but I rarely use it. For those willing to waste hours building, it is a good time. I feel it halts the game and can make things too easy/difficult compared to BOTW. Fuse also feels annoying. It is another gaming the system mechanic that makes weapons worse and not worth finding unless you go out and get the parts to stack the stats. The benefit is that it makes one fight enemies more, but I never really cared for this and feel the UI getting worse doesn't justify it. Ascend and recall are good additions.
I miss BOTW's runes. Bombs were a nice back up for no weapons and made for unique kills, Cryonis was nice for some travel and puzzles, Stasis made for cool interactions and puzzles, and magnesis was easy to understand. BOTW's runes were practical and lent themselves to puzzles, while TOTK was more obtuse and only one can make for a decent puzzle item, being recall.

The open-world itself feels worse in many ways. Not only does Ultrahand create factors that undercut it, but it lacks personality. BOTW was a somber game where Link travels around a destroyed world. It felt oppressive given the Guardians, and sad when looking at the remnants of the past. Tears has no personality. It is the same destroyed world, maybe even worse, yet has random new structures and life far apart. There are no big enemies to scare the piss out of you and make you reroute like the Guardians did. It feels more hollow, only aided by how infrequent Koroks are in this title compared to BOTW. Add in some changes like lava gone missing in Eldin, which makes it less unique. The only area that was fixed was Hebra, the rest got worse and the map geography is worse in general. They should have kept the previous map and region design.

It did not fix ANY of the problems from BOTW that I or others had.
Vertical movement options are improved. The map also is not completely barren prior to climbing the tower, which helps navigation if you are like me and don't set up the map as you want to keep totals on regions. Better dungeons and end bosses.

You now have to staple monster parts to every weapon for them to be even remotely useful.
The depths have some non-corrupted weapons that are fine, but yeah.

The new mechanics feel more like gimmicks (going back to the classic Zelda issue of each game is the same but with an irritating shtick, which is one of the reasons I stopped liking the series).

A lot of the abilities are simply not as fun to play around with as Magnesis/Stasis/that ice thing were, and have less utility and feel like they only exist for the sake of the new gimmicks.
Pretty much. It is a simplicity versus complication problem. Ultrahand and Fuse are more impressive and lead to more player creativity, but cannot be reeled in for puzzles and generally feel like a waste if not into collecting parts to build the ultimate battle tank.

Some stuff like Korok seed hunting actively got worse.
Feels less frequent to stumble onto them, I say as a guy who left off with 407.

The game is literally just an expansion pack but with a boring underworld added and sky islands that are themselves uninteresting.
Depends on area, but I would say most of the Depths and Sky leave little to be desired.
 
Hasn't that been Nintendo's schtick since the NES? Use inferior technology, sell the console as a lost but make fucking bank on the games.
NES/Famicom was more or less a midrange computer with a powerful, bespoke GPU by 1983 standards. There was an episode of Gamecenter CX where Iwata mentions Nintendo's whole design philosophy was, more or less, they wanted a way to sell home versions of their arcade games, and came up with a modular system that could run them. I don't know if they made or lost money on each console, but they didn't include anything that wasn't necessary to run stuff like Donkey Kong and Tennis. Later cartridges did a lot more heavy lifting than you'd expect, with having extra RAM and stuff on the cartridge itself.

Hell, the Wii and GameCube are literally the exact same hardware but with different controllers,
Nope. They're the same architecture, but Wii's a generation ahead, and more powerful than Gamecube. Not by a huge margin, but it's sort of akin to the power difference between Dreamcast and Xbox. Here are technical specification pages for Gamecube and Wii.
 
Nope. They're the same architecture, but Wii's a generation ahead, and more powerful than Gamecube. Not by a huge margin, but it's sort of akin to the power difference between Dreamcast and Xbox. Here are technical specification pages for Gamecube and Wii.
The wii when I was a kid felt surprisingly powerful. It wasn't going to win any performance awards, but for the time, it's price+performance made it fairly competitive. Not to mention there were a surprising amount of ports for the Wii you'd think on the surface just wouldn't work
 
Later cartridges did a lot more heavy lifting than you'd expect, with having extra RAM and stuff on the cartridge itself.
That's the big advantage cartridges will have over discs, along with ever-expanding storage capacity. Take a look at the port of Donkey Kong and then compare that to a late-stage title like Kirby or Adventure Island IV, and it's like a generational leap all by itself.
 
I been considering the switch now that there's a working flashcart for it but fuck that price bro, its almost half the cost of the console itself.

Can just play switch games in actual 1080p at real 60fps using Yuzu anyway.
 
Can just play switch games in actual 1080p at real 60fps using Yuzu anyway.
Honestly considering that like 95% of the Switch's library is available on other platforms anyway, what do you even need an emulator for?

How does a Switch flashcart work? Surely Nintendo is just gonna patch it out or something.
 
I just opened a brand new Switch game and there's no Gold Coin code, do they only offer that for digital games now? That's fucking bullshit.

Edit: nevermind, I'm retarded
 
Last edited:
If they are in fact planning to reveal the Switch 2 within the next 2 to 3 months, it may explain the long delay; they probably won't don't a traditional direct in that case, at least not until after the reveal.
If I were a “leaker”, I’d say they’ll do something like this:
>Direct this month to talk about Switch’s 2024
>Formal Switch 2 reveal trailer in June but nothing else
>Mini Direct in August to wrap up the Switch focus plus a “we’re still working on Switch 2, please understand” message
>Switch 2 presentation in September, leading up to the release on November 17


If nothing else, I think we only have one more full-size Switch Direct until they begin to publicly transition to the next system.
 
Speaking of Nintendo Direct, autists, & leakers, the new Donkey Kong game speculation is heating back up.
I hope those autists and leakers get AIDS and die.

People were speculating the 6th right? Guess that didn't happen.

Because those people are autistic faggots.

I don't think the Switch 2 is coming until next year. This year will be the swansong.

The above is NOT a leak, just my speculation because I'm not an autistic faggot about the Switch.
 
Back
Top Bottom