I'm waiting for BOTW2. What's annoying though are all the new theory videos that are trying desperately to to tie this game directly to Ocarina, despite it looking more like it has much more stronger ties to Skyward Sword.
Floating Castle? Must be somehow linked to Ocarina.
Possible time travel? Must be tied to Ocarina.
Spirit Hand? Through convoluted logic and heavy wishful thinking- Ancient Glowy hand ->Ancient Hero->Spirit of the Hero-> The Hero of Time must be involved somehow!
Even though this game has floating islands hiiiiigh above the clouds, a robot that looks like it could easily fit both BOTW and Skyward Sword, and somewhat Skyward Sword-esc time-shifting abilities by the Glowy Hand. Even a possibility of traveling 10,000 years back into the past, which fits more with Skyward Sword's traveling back towards it's ancient times that were thousands of years into the past rather then a mere seven years like in Ocarina.
It wouldn't be as annoying if these types of people didn't show that they always have a perpetual hardboner for this one Zelda game from their childhoods. They always go back to this game being 'revolutionary' for Zelda even though the only 'revolutionary' thing it really did was rehash the plot from A Link to the Past and make it 3D. Even the 3D was weak, we had Quake I and II, and Half-Life that were already out by then, and they still did 3D way better.