Nintendo Fanbase Stupidity General - Rants on the explosive fanbase

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Does Nintendo have a bad fanbase

  • Yes

    Votes: 915 93.2%
  • No

    Votes: 67 6.8%

  • Total voters
    982
I get being underwhelmed by the graphics but the salt over the robot confuses me. Nobody ever complained about SA-X in Fusion.
I think because it just doesn't look cool.

It looks like a knockoff Gorgon from Stranger Things. But that looked threatening because it had rows of teeth and was fleshy. This just looks like a Boston Dynamix robot.

Like most are more than likely comparing it to the enemies that Prime has. And if it's supposed to be the big bad it's kind of lacking in that department.
 
It’s rich that people think they already know enough about Dread to call it overpriced after just 20 mins of footage and a trailer. It’s a given that the first HD 2D Metroid is going to cost more than all of the lower res, portable 2D Metroids. At this point the only way that Dread could be overpriced to me is if it was absolute shit like Other M was.
 
I don't think these people ever owned a 3DS. The dumbest Nintendo fans seem to be ones that jumped on the Switch bandwagon.
It's a draw between Switch and Wii, they'll then parrot stuff that popular youtubers say and needlessly drive up the prices for old games for hardware that they don't own.

We're to the point where you can walk into home goods and they have wall mounts for NES carts.
 
I don't think these people ever owned a 3DS. The dumbest Nintendo fans seem to be ones that jumped on the Switch bandwagon.
They jumped on the bandwagon or they're one of those people that has a strange disdain for the 3DS because it's handheld or something.
 
They jumped on the bandwagon or they're one of those people that has a strange disdain for the 3DS because it's handheld or something.
Well the original model did have an ungodly tiny screen even compared to phones back then. It made playing monster hunter on it feel like ass even with the extra control stick addon.

The shoulder buttons would also make your hands cramp if you were playing Mario kart. But other than that it was fine, it had a much longer battery life than the switch.
 
I am really looking forward for Dread for focusing of my favorite aspects of Metroid Fusion of dealing with a unkillable enemy that instills fear for a 2D game. That moment in Fusion that you come across the SA-X and the music and atmosphere of silence hoping that it goes away and the parts where you have no choice but to run from it with intense music made a great set piece for that game.
 
I am really looking forward for Dread for focusing of my favorite aspects of Metroid Fusion of dealing with a unkillable enemy that instills fear for a 2D game. That moment in Fusion that you come across the SA-X and the music and atmosphere of silence hoping that it goes away and the parts where you have no choice but to run from it with intense music made a great set piece for that game.

My hope is that the game focuses way more on the actual avoidance and/or fleeing. For all the love for this Fusion gets, there's only a few sequences where it actually had any weight to it.
 
My hope is that the game focuses way more on the actual avoidance and/or fleeing. For all the love for this Fusion gets, there's only a few sequences where it actually had any weight to it.
It's kind of looking towards avoiding the new enemies, given how each one has a few rooms that it can roam in.
 
I'm waiting for BOTW2. What's annoying though are all the new theory videos that are trying desperately to to tie this game directly to Ocarina, despite it looking more like it has much more stronger ties to Skyward Sword.

Floating Castle? Must be somehow linked to Ocarina.
Possible time travel? Must be tied to Ocarina.
Spirit Hand? Through convoluted logic and heavy wishful thinking- Ancient Glowy hand ->Ancient Hero->Spirit of the Hero-> The Hero of Time must be involved somehow!

Even though this game has floating islands hiiiiigh above the clouds, a robot that looks like it could easily fit both BOTW and Skyward Sword, and somewhat Skyward Sword-esc time-shifting abilities by the Glowy Hand. Even a possibility of traveling 10,000 years back into the past, which fits more with Skyward Sword's traveling back towards it's ancient times that were thousands of years into the past rather then a mere seven years like in Ocarina.

It wouldn't be as annoying if these types of people didn't show that they always have a perpetual hardboner for this one Zelda game from their childhoods. They always go back to this game being 'revolutionary' for Zelda even though the only 'revolutionary' thing it really did was rehash the plot from A Link to the Past and make it 3D. Even the 3D was weak, we had Quake I and II, and Half-Life that were already out by then, and they still did 3D way better.
 
I'm waiting for BOTW2. What's annoying though are all the new theory videos that are trying desperately to to tie this game directly to Ocarina, despite it looking more like it has much more stronger ties to Skyward Sword.

Floating Castle? Must be somehow linked to Ocarina.
Possible time travel? Must be tied to Ocarina.
Spirit Hand? Through convoluted logic and heavy wishful thinking- Ancient Glowy hand ->Ancient Hero->Spirit of the Hero-> The Hero of Time must be involved somehow!

Even though this game has floating islands hiiiiigh above the clouds, a robot that looks like it could easily fit both BOTW and Skyward Sword, and somewhat Skyward Sword-esc time-shifting abilities by the Glowy Hand. Even a possibility of traveling 10,000 years back into the past, which fits more with Skyward Sword's traveling back towards it's ancient times that were thousands of years into the past rather then a mere seven years like in Ocarina.

It wouldn't be as annoying if these types of people didn't show that they always have a perpetual hardboner for this one Zelda game from their childhoods. They always go back to this game being 'revolutionary' for Zelda even though the only 'revolutionary' thing it really did was rehash the plot from A Link to the Past and make it 3D. Even the 3D was weak, we had Quake I and II, and Half-Life that were already out by then, and they still did 3D way better.

Zelda theorists are dumbasses. Not only did Nintendo make it obvious BotW has references to all games and timeliness but they flat out said they wanted to avoid all timeliness shit by putting it so far in the future.

All the old games are obviously legends and fables in the world BotW takes place in.

Timeline and Canon autists are the worst thing to happen to Zelda. These story obsessed faggots are very out of place with Nintendo they should play Sony shit.
 
Timeline and Canon autists are the worst thing to happen to Zelda. These story obsessed faggots are very out of place with Nintendo they should play Sony shit.
Storyfags had fucking issues with the new ratchet and clank being hard.

There is literally no place they're welcome unless the "game" only consists of pressing a button to select dialogue.

People are still requesting an easy mode to DES Remake and are afraid that if Sony turns the Soulsborne series into a Mega Multimedia franchise that they'll be left in the social media dust because all the games are too hard for them. Despite the gold coin trick still working for the DES remake.
 
Story is great. But entirely meaningless without good gameplay.

Phoenix Wright is your baseline. At least have some decent hidden object gameplay and puzzles that make you think. And even then, Phoenix Wright is still a game for massive faggots and weebs.
 
Back
Top Bottom