The Potato Question could be a new Breakfast Question or Shopping Trolley Return Dilemma.
Do we really need more hypothetical questions that these same people will proceed to misunderstand and start using back at others assuming its some kinda argument-winner?
We already have idiots who shove the breakfast question in your face upon the mildest of disagreement, they don't know what it means, what the logic behind it is, under what conditions a perfectly intelligent person may still not answer it "correctly", and just assume it's an end-all litmus test of intellect you can drop on anyone and immediately gouge whether they're super smart or a retard, as opposed to understanding it as simply one example illustrating the broader concept of theory of mind
The amount of times I've seen online arguments that go something like
>Retard: How would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning
>Inside retards mind: The correct answer is "I would be hungry" so if they answer literally anything else, they're a moron
>Other guy: Well I don't think I'd mind since I never eat breakfast-
>Retard: HA, YOU DIDN'T GIVE THE CORRECT ANSWER YOU'RE AN IDIOT LMAOOOO LOOKIT DIS DUUUUUUUDE
Or
>Other guy: This is irrelevant to the discussion we're having / What does this have to do with what we're talking about? / Don't change the subject
>Retard: [Same ritual]
If anything this is apt for a thread about niggers because it perfectly follows their usual behavior of seeing an example of an idea that was formulated through some kinda logic, not understanding the logic itself, but trying to "use" the idea in their favor
Like how they don't comprehend what cleanliness is, but they were told it's important so now they mock others for not performing it right despite not getting it