🐱 New Tools Could Help Prevent Incel Terrorism

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty

On November 2, 2018, a 40-year-old man later identified as Scott Paul Beierle walked into Tallahassee Hot Yoga, a yoga studio in Tallahassee, Florida. Almost immediately after entering, he shot six people, killing two women, A male customer confronted the shooter with either a broomstick or a vacuum cleaner (witness accounts vary) before being pistol-whipped, allowing other customers to flee to safety. Minutes later, officers arrived and found two women, Maura Binkley, 21, and Dr. Nancy Van Vessem, 61, dead at the scene. They also found Beierle's body; he had apparently shot himself.

A military veteran and former high school, Beierle showed few of the warning signs linked with extremist violence aside from prior charges for battery involving him grabbing a woman's buttocks on two occasions. Investigators later determined that he self-identified with the involuntary celibate (Incel) movement after turning up several YouTube videos he had posted in 2014. These videos also showed him sympathizing with the perpetrator of a 2014 Incel shooting, as well as reflecting his deep-rooted misogyny as well as ranting about interracial relationships, illegal aliens, and African-Americans. The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism later classified the Tallahassee shooting as a case of misogynistic terrorism.

While the early Incel movement was originally considered largely harmless and made up of "unlucky in love" individuals forming a loosely-knit community, this changed drastically in 2014 with a mass shooting in Isla Vista, California, in which six people were killed. Though the shooter, Elliot Rodger, killed himself at the scene, his online manifesto clearly described his misogynistic beliefs and made him a hero in violent Incel circles. Since the Isla Vista attack, there have been 13 recorded incidents of violent Incel extremism—a 500 percent increase from 2014 to the present day. As a result, the Southern Poverty Law Center now includes "male supremacy" as an extremist ideology along with religious and racial extremism.

Research looking at the recent rise in Incel violent extremism suggests that it is primarily motivated by three main factors: misogyny, entitlement, and jealousy. Online forums among Incels frequently include all three of these features, along with the jealousy aimed at "Chads" (attractive men) and the sense of unfairness at being ignored by "Staceys" (attractive women") as well as praise for perpetrators of Incel violence such as Rodger and Bierle. Though only a minority of Incel supporters will ever engage in violence, predicting who among them are likely to become "lone wolf" terrorists remains a serious challenge.

A new research study published in the Journal of Threat Assessment and Management analyzes the Tallahassee shooting using a specialized predictive tool intended to identify "lone wolf" terrorists. Christopher J. Collins and James J. Clark of the College of Social Work at Florida State University use a tool known as the Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Profile (TRAP-18), which is itself based on the extensive work of Dr. Reid Meloy and his colleagues in the investigation of lone-wolf terrorism.

The TRAP-18 is made up of two sets of indicators: the first consists of eight warning behaviors that suggest an attack is imminent (proximal risk factors) and 10 predisposing characteristics that make people vulnerable to extremist influences (proximal risk factors). These warning signs are:

  • Pathway warning behavior such as signs of researching, planning, or preparing for an attack. People planning attacks are often caught at this stage through their attempts at acquiring explosives, seeking information on how to construct a bomb, etc. Setting up a workshop in which explosives can be constructed can also be a pathway behavior.
  • Fixation warning behavior indicates an increasingly pathological preoccupation with a specific cause or target of violence. This is usually accompanied by a deteriorating social life or thein ability to hold down a job due to obsessive behavior or thinking.
  • Identification warning behavior involves signs that someone is identifying with other lone-wolf terrorists or showing a desire to be a pseudocommando. They may also show signs of a "warrior mentality," collect guns or military equipment, or proclaim themselves to be an agent of an extremist group. Though many people may express support for groups such as this, making the transition to being a self-proclaimed "soldier" for a specific cause should be viewed with particular concern.
  • Novel aggression is violence that seems to be occurring for the first time and appears out of character. In many cases, this may represent someone testing their limits regarding how much violence they feel capable of inflicting.
  • Energy-burst warning behavior involves a sharp increase in activities relating to their target. Even if this increased activity seems innocent, it can suggest a "ramping up" of whatever is being planned. This can also be associated with a sharp drop in regular activities such as spending time on social media. Some lone wolves may even go "dark" by starting to use encryption to conceal what they are doing online or otherwise hide their activities from friends or family.
  • Leakage involves relaying information to a third party, whether family, a friend, or a news media outlet, about imminent harm being planned against a target. This leakage is usually done as covertly as possible such as with delayed videos, etc. This ensures that the lone wolf can't be stopped ahead of time.
  • Last-resort warning usually occurs as a sign of desperation or distress. This warning indicates that something big is about to happen and often occurs as the result of a loss or fear of an impending loss.
  • Directly communicated threats are the most visible warning sign and the only ones that law enforcement agencies can respond to in many cases. This is why threats are taken so seriously: It may be the final stage in a long pattern of escalation.
In examining Bierele's case using the TRAP-18, Collins and Clark studied approximately 70 pages of Bierle's employment records, disciplinary reports from school districts where he worked, and his U.S. Army service record obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. This provided extensive data concerning biographic events in his life, including personal crises, grievances, and the various "triggers" affecting his later actions. They also examined data about Bierle's routine and habits as witnessed by the people around him to discern any patterns of escalating warning behaviors in the days and weeks that preceded his attack.

Though Collins and Clark could not find any explanation for why Bierle targeted a yoga studio, they did note a series of warning signs that became increasingly clear as the attack grew closer. They also found that Beirle started searching for yoga-related Internet content as early as 2016, including specific searches for "Tallahassee hot yoga." This apparently stemmed from a prior online contact he had with a woman in 2013 who mentioned taking classes there, though she terminated all contact as she considered him to be "crazy" and "weird and insulting."

Though these searches stopped later that same year, they resumed in 2018 in the weeks leading up to his attack. His searches included looking for class schedules as well as phoning the clinic directly, though he didn't speak to anyone. This met the criterion for pathway learning behavior which, along with Bierle's already extensive weapons knowledge, indicated an imminent risk of attack.

He also showed extreme fixation due to his preoccupation with women as "immoral." This included writing and recording music with blatantly misogynistic content as well as committing battery on three different women by grabbing their buttocks. He also repeatedly referred to Elliot Rodger in his online videos and sent his sister-in-law cards and letters containing content on gang rape that she found extremely disturbing. Though she reported her brother-in-law to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), nothing really came of it.

Analysis of Bierle's writing also showed disturbing signs of identification, i.e., seeing himself as an agent to advance the incel cause. He kept referring to his future "success" and showed greater signs that he wanted to become a pseucommando for the movement with which he had aligned himself. In the weeks immediately preceding the attack, he showed a distinct energy burst pattern with cell phone records showing him making repeated drives to Tallahassee as he apparently began rehearsing his attack. He also purchased a yoga mat and ear protection along with scouting out a regional cheerleaders camp which he had apparently considered as an alternate target.

As he planned his attack, Bierle also carefully arranged various documents in the trunk of his car. These included medical, psychiatric, military, and employment records that he wanted to be found afterward to ensure that he was easily identified. He also left behind a "last resort" warning with statements such as "I have a duty, an obligation, a moral obligation to proceed and act as such” which, along with leaving his motel key in his room, showed that he never intended to return to collect his belongings afterward.

While there was nothing in the available data to show other signs such as leakage, directly communicated threat, or novel aggression, his history of criminal violence, including repeated battery charges, certainly suggests that he was an active risk for future violence even before the Tallahassee shootings.

Could what happened on November 2, 2018, have been prevented if police had been more proactive? Though using the TRAP-18 retrospectively certainly flagged Beirle as a potential lone-actor terrorist, there is still much we do not know about the Incel movement and the recent rise in violence. It also demonstrated that, while mental illness has long been viewed as the primary cause of lone attacks, that certainly does not seem to apply to Scott Paul Bierle, something that likely explains why law enforcement agencies failed to take him seriously until too late.

One thing that Bierle's case clearly identifies is that the FBI and other police forces that dealt with him over the years largely failed to prevent him from becoming more radicalized. Despite his repeated arrests and even an FBI investigation, he consistently fell between the cracks without any kind of coordinated response. Also, many states lack the kind of legislation that might protect women from men holding extremist views. For example, Florida, where Bierle lived and carried out his attack, has no hate-crime legislation in place, something that is also true of 10 other U.S. states.

For now, despite the greater scrutiny the Incel movement is getting from law enforcement agencies, there seems little to prevent future violence. While instruments such as the TRAP-18 are certainly valuable, legislators also need to do their part in passing strong legislation to prevent gender-based violence and rein in extremist movements.
 
There is a lot to this.

First there is the media showing attractive people all the time. Incel Timmy and Ugly Betty no longer realise that they belong together. They pine for Chad and Waifu.

Second is that marriage has been demolished.

Third is as said, Chad getting all the cave pussy was standard for pre-civilised societies.
Male wants to father as many children as possible, female wants the best gene donor.

This system worked, but men in those days brained each other with rocks all the time to stop being Incel.

Than bigger societies realised that this was harmful to the collective, so religions and rulers laid down the law of marriage.
It curbed evolutionary behavior but kept away violence. Chad had Stacy, and Incel had Ugly.
Stability was gained. The benefit of a coherent and well oiled society outweighted the fact that less genetically perfect people reproduced as well. This benefitted the Chads, for now they had incels to lord over.

Now that is out of the window.

This is just a return to monke moment. Incels will react violently, and Stacy will go after Chad, even if she has to share him with a dozen others.

Now in the old times, this resulted in many Chads so it worked.
But with birth control and nignogs, this will result in le 25% face, stupid half monkey babies, and China and Russia laughter heard a continent away.
 
That’s the feminist’s facile take. It’s how women eschew any self-reflection or responsibility for the army of lonely, disenfranchised men their life choices (as a group) have helped create.

To put it another way: women have created this situation because, as the gatekeepers of sex, they feel entitled to only the top ten or fifteen percent of men, and male adoration, for simply existing. See how that works?

There are plenty of average guys out there that are constantly sidelined for reasons other than their personalities. Too short? Too tall? Too fat? Maybe balding a little early? Don’t make enough money? Have unpopular/uncool hobbies? Low-status job?
There are as many reasons for in inceldom as there are incels themselves. As the prophet K-Weezy once observed, I ain’t sayin’ she a gold digger…

No man may be ‘entitled’ to a partner, but we are driven by fundamental biology to seek them. In the past, just about everyone got a chance, because female hypergamy was understood as corrosive to society and not allowed to run rampant. People were married and it was for life.

Now neither men nor women are truly happy any longer. A huge number of men have been relegated to positions from which they cannot attract a mate, because women see themselves as above anything but ‘the best’. Women in turn cannot have relationships because they generally prefer to date men who are desirable enough to have a different woman gargling their jizz every day, and so do.

And even if a man does secure a mate, she can simply walk away with half his shit as a legally-enforceable anti-male tax. Think of that; women now get rewarded for destroying relationships.

A return to trad values is the only way out of this mess. The grand social experiment to destroy the nuclear family- the seat of the white race’s power-has worked, and worked well. These incel shooters aren’t terrorists: they’re the vanguard of an army fighting back against an undeclared war, the purpose of which is to destroy our people.

You’re free to disagree, of course. I understand my views are out of step with society as a whole. I just hope the women in your future aren’t the shallow, materialistic narcissists and psychopaths I had to deal with before I landed a tradwife.

Your mistake is thinking returning to trad values of Women being protected priviledged all that shit and only having to fake some affection is going to work, Its gone too far for that to be considered acceptable, why should men agreed to submit in exchange for somewhat more fancy cage ? no its going to get further, Consequences of their actions.
 
I definitely agree with you that the dating pool gets very shallow once you reach your 30s. I'm married, but I know people in their late-20s early-30s that are having trouble finding a boyfriend/girlfriend around their age, and women in their early 20s are just, just plain awful.
The dating pool is an ocean for men in positions of power, wealth and/or fame, regardless of age. Middle-class guys don't stand a chance unless they marry early or level up in status.

I was going to say that traditionalist societies had a better handle on these things, but I'd probably end up sounding like one of those exceptional incels moaning about arranged marriages.

There is a lot to this.

First there is the media showing attractive people all the time. Incel Timmy and Ugly Betty no longer realise that they belong together. They pine for Chad and Waifu.

Second is that marriage has been demolished.

Third is as said, Chad getting all the cave pussy was standard for pre-civilised societies.
Male wants to father as many children as possible, female wants the best gene donor.

This system worked, but men in those days brained each other with rocks all the time to stop being Incel.

Than bigger societies realised that this was harmful to the collective, so religions and rulers laid down the law of marriage.
It curbed evolutionary behavior but kept away violence. Chad had Stacy, and Incel had Ugly.
Stability was gained. The benefit of a coherent and well oiled society outweighted the fact that less genetically perfect people reproduced as well. This benefitted the Chads, for now they had incels to lord over.

Now that is out of the window.

This is just a return to monke moment. Incels will react violently, and Stacy will go after Chad, even if she has to share him with a dozen others.

Now in the old times, this resulted in many Chads so it worked.
But with birth control and nignogs, this will result in le 25% face, stupid half monkey babies, and China and Russia laughter heard a continent away.
The current Nigger community works in a similar way. Sheniqua passes up the various Incels and "lames" (basically any black male considered too nerdy, too "white" or not aggressive enough) and makes a bee-line straight for the nigger Chads -- the J'kwans, Tyrones, Deyshuns, etc.

Tyrone gets to spread his nigger seed anywhere and everywhere as evolution intended. Sheniqua gets her pick of the nigger Chad litter and gets knocked up with as many nigger seeds as her monkey tunnel would allow. This continues until Sheniqua ages out of the nigger Chad harem and goes looking for a "lame" to leech off of financially, regardless of whether she's sucking on ol' massuh's Uncle Sam's teat.

Tyrone's nibbling on the edges of the white community, nabbing as many Stacys willing to burn coal to get back at daddy or manage their low self-esteem/self-worth issues.
 
Last edited:
Because women are incredibly possessive. They do not want to be a side piece. They want monogamy.
This is why modern women are overwhelmingly promiscuous. This is why modern women are encouraged by the prevailing social signaling to be promiscuous, take pride in promiscuity, and denigrate attempts at chastity from either their female peers (e.g. virgin-shaming) or men (e.g. being suspected as gay, jeers of "incel" regardless of reality).

You're confusing possessiveness with a desire for monogamy. There are many women who don't want to be the side piece, but that doesn't have to do with the desire for monogamy as much as it does the desire for validation (they can't feel special if the man is openly screwing around with other women) and resource access (they want something to always be able to come back to while also searching for something better). It's not just the behaviors that make this apparent-- the longstanding trope of the "knight in shining armor" or the "prince charming" that exists purely to provide the woman with all she wants, on an exclusive basis, without her having to do anything has been pelted at generations of young girls with zero pushback.

If anything, women are overwhelmingly trained to expect monogamy in regards to them. In short, beta orbiters.

It's worth it to discuss exceptions, I believe, but one of the best ways to understand the subculture is to recognize the prevailing trends and social messaging that they allow to persist-- and that's just a general rule of thumb for most any culture.

Women being the gatekeepers set the bar high, as well they should. Nobody wants to be stuck with a baby from a deadbeat dad loser idiot.
You're 25% correct.

Women should have proper expectations. They overwhelmingly do not-- as a matter of fact, they don't have realistic expectations to begin with because they aren't taught to sympathize with the construction of any kind of man. And when many do select a mate, they do select deadbeats, because how they weigh the components of their cost-benefit analysis is disordered.

Women are also not intrinsically entitled to any kind of man, in the same way a man is not intrinsically entitled to any kind of woman. Accordingly, a woman isn't entitled to high expectations inasmuch as they offer little to nothing for those who may meet such expectations.
 
Last edited:
There is a lot to this.

First there is the media showing attractive people all the time. Incel Timmy and Ugly Betty no longer realise that they belong together. They pine for Chad and Waifu.

Second is that marriage has been demolished.

Third is as said, Chad getting all the cave pussy was standard for pre-civilised societies.
Male wants to father as many children as possible, female wants the best gene donor.

This system worked, but men in those days brained each other with rocks all the time to stop being Incel.

Than bigger societies realised that this was harmful to the collective, so religions and rulers laid down the law of marriage.
It curbed evolutionary behavior but kept away violence. Chad had Stacy, and Incel had Ugly.
Stability was gained. The benefit of a coherent and well oiled society outweighted the fact that less genetically perfect people reproduced as well. This benefitted the Chads, for now they had incels to lord over.

Now that is out of the window.

This is just a return to monke moment. Incels will react violently, and Stacy will go after Chad, even if she has to share him with a dozen others.

Now in the old times, this resulted in many Chads so it worked.
But with birth control and nignogs, this will result in le 25% face, stupid half monkey babies, and China and Russia laughter heard a continent away.
If only cave chad was memechad sigma male grindset man. We'd be in the space ages and all chads. Instead, cave chad is just a pretty-faced fuck boy with average intelligence.
 
Back
Top Bottom