New cracks emerge in Dem unity - you don't say

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account


House Democrats are showing more cracks in their united front just two months into the new Congress.

Leaders are scrambling to contain high-profile rifts between liberals and centrists on everything from the Green New Deal and “Medicare for all,” to the handling of controversial remarks by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and the impeachment of President Trump.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has built a hard-earned reputation for coalescing her caucus around shared Democratic values and keeping her troops in line on even the most controversial legislative proposals.

And in the early weeks of the 116th Congress, Democrats held together through a long, high-stakes shutdown debate, forcing Trump to abandon his demands for border wall funding.

But Pelosi may be dealing with her toughest challenge yet in governing a caucus that is tilting to the left and includes many new members impatient to take action against Trump — but that also has dozens of moderate members who just won victories in Trump districts.

Some members of Pelosi’s team brush off the recent flare-ups as a natural part of governing a majority — particularly the most diverse House caucus in history.

“I just think that we lose too many battles up here arguing over the stuff that’s kind of silly to argue over,” Rep. James Clyburn (S.C.), the Democratic whip and a prominent member of the Congressional Black Caucus, said during an interview in his office in the Capitol.

“Everybody talks about how diverse this Congress is. This Congress is not diverse; the Democratic Caucus is diverse,” he continued, noting that the GOP conference has only one black member. “We’ve got 53 black people in our caucus. How many Muslims do you think are in their caucus?

“So, it’s going to be different for us.”

Yet the internal tensions — coming after a post-midterm leadership fight over Pelosi’s future atop the party — aren’t about frivolous matters, at least for the most part.

Many are about policy, and they have exposed divisions along lines that are regional, ideological, religious and generational.

Worse, the rifts are shifting the spotlight from Democratic priorities.

A sweeping package of government reforms and voting rights protections, for instance, is poised to pass the House on Friday. But it’s been all but ignored amid the media’s focus on the Democrats’ infighting.

The latest headache for Democratic leaders surrounds Omar, one of two history-making Muslim women to arrive this year on Capitol Hill. She stirred a hornet’s nest of controversy last week with comments at a public event which detractors say suggested American supporters of Israel have an “allegiance to a foreign country.”

The remarks were quickly condemned by Israel’s most vocal allies, including several senior House Democrats — Reps. Nita Lowey (N.Y.) and Eliot Engel (N.Y.), both of whom are Jewish — who lashed out at Omar publicly and quickly pressed Pelosi and other Democratic leaders to draft a legislative response condemning anti-Semitism.

The critics charged that Omar was invoking the long-held anti-Semitic trope that anyone supportive of Israel is compromised by “dual loyalty.”

Yet Omar’s liberal allies have since rallied around the Minnesota freshman. They say she’s been singled out unfairly because she’s a minority woman, and they’ve pressed Democratic leaders to broaden the sweep of their resolution to condemn all forms of hate speech, including when it’s directed at Muslims.

“I think we need to talk about white supremacy in our country very much more directly than that resolution did in the first place,” Rep. Rashida Tlaib(D-Mich.), the other Muslim woman to join Congress this year, said Wednesday. “And I think we’ve been heard.”

Trump and the Republicans have been happy to stoke the Democratic fires.

“It is shameful that House Democrats won’t take a stronger stand against Anti-Semitism in their conference,” Trump tweeted Wednesday. “Anti-Semitism has fueled atrocities throughout history and it’s inconceivable they will not act to condemn it!”

Clyburn came to Omar’s defense Wednesday, lamenting that many of the media reports surrounding the recent controversy have omitted mentioning that Omar, who was born in Somalia, had to flee the country to escape violence and spent four years in a Kenyan refugee camp before coming to the United States.

Her experience, Clyburn argued, is much more empirical — and powerful — than that of people who are generations removed from the Holocaust, Japanese internment camps during World War II and the other violent episodes that have marked history.

“I’m serious about that. There are people who tell me, ‘Well, my parents are Holocaust survivors.’ ‘My parents did this.’ It’s more personal with her,” Clyburn said. “I’ve talked to her, and I can tell you she is living through a lot of pain.”

Clyburn said that long talks with former Rep. Norman Mineta (D-Calif.), a Japanese-American who was interned during WWII, gave him a special appreciation for Omar’s experiences. And he rejected the idea that the Democrats’ resolution will single her out for condemnation.

“She won’t be targeted. We’re going to target those people who had her picture on the Twin Towers,” Clyburn said. “This resolution is going to be inclusive; it’s going to be expansive; and I might just try to add something to deal with that billboard that’s up in Pennsylvania this morning calling John Lewis and other members of the Congressional Black Caucus racists.”

The Omar controversy is not the only episode where Democratic leaders have sought to strike a balance between the liberal and moderate wings of the party. On Medicare for All, for instance, Pelosi has promised committee hearings even as she’s fought to prioritize improvements to the Affordable Care Act instead. Approaching climate change, she’s hailed the enthusiasm of the Green New Deal supporters without endorsing the proposal.

But it’s over impeachment that the clearest divisions may be emerging. Democratic leaders are taking a cautious approach, but a growing number of liberals are getting impatient. And Tlaib announced Wednesday that she’ll soon introduce legislation to oust the president.

“When I speak to leadership, they constantly remind me that I have to represent my district,” Tlaib said. “This is an emergency for many of us.”



TL;DR democrats hate each other because of omar, green deal, and impeachment
 
Why do they care so much about racial diversity? Dems are the only ones that truly care about what race you are and they think that it's an important part of your life.
 
“Everybody talks about how diverse this Congress is. This Congress is not diverse; the Democratic Caucus is diverse,” he continued, noting that the GOP conference has only one black member. “We’ve got 53 black people in our caucus. How many Muslims do you think are in their caucus?

"We are so not racist. Anyways, check out all these cool exotic minority people we collected!"
 
Why do they care so much about racial diversity? Dems are the only ones that truly care about what race you are and they think that it's an important part of your life.

Look at the literature that is popular now. YA novels where people are assigned to classes/houses/clans. The only way to win is to work together but never to change one's mind. Its unsurprising the left picked race to live out its fantasies.
 
Many [rifts] are about policy, and they have exposed divisions along lines that are regional, ideological, religious and generational.

What do you know. Different people with different points of view perceive their needs as different.

[Omar's] experience, Clyburn argued, is much more empirical — and powerful — than that of people who are generations removed from the Holocaust, Japanese internment camps during World War II and the other violent episodes that have marked history.

“I’m serious about that. There are people who tell me, ‘Well, my parents are Holocaust survivors.’ ‘My parents did this.’ It’s more personal with her,” Clyburn said. “I’ve talked to her, and I can tell you she is living through a lot of pain.”

Oh, there we go. She's the real victim here, not the people she attacked. The leftist cries out in pain as he strikes you.
 
Part of the problem when you always frame every problem as "everyone else vs whitey". When your entire ideology is based on victimhood and oppression, how do you decide whose oppression boner is the biggest, when 1 of the two groups ISN'T the big bad straight white man, and they start to step on each others toes?
 
Part of the problem when you always frame every problem as "everyone else vs whitey". When your entire ideology is based on victimhood and oppression, how do you decide whose oppression boner is the biggest, when 1 of the two groups ISNT the big bad straight white man, and they start to step on each others toes?
right now, it’s not an issue, because of their shared goal of “get whitey” but once whitey is no longer a majority, a plurality, or intersectionality w/e....they will step on each other’s toes. And worse.
 
Yet Omar’s liberal allies have since rallied around the Minnesota freshman. They say she’s been singled out unfairly because she’s a minority woman, and they’ve pressed Democratic leaders to broaden the sweep of their resolution to condemn all forms of hate speech, including when it’s directed at Muslims.
“It is shameful that House Democrats won’t take a stronger stand against Anti-Semitism in their conference,” Trump tweeted Wednesday. “Anti-Semitism has fueled atrocities throughout history and it’s inconceivable they will not act to condemn it!”
So antisemitism is okay when a Muslim person says it but it's trump fault when some dumb gab boomer shoots up a synagogue
 
But it’s over impeachment that the clearest divisions may be emerging. Democratic leaders are taking a cautious approach, but a growing number of liberals are getting impatient. And Tlaib announced Wednesday that she’ll soon introduce legislation to oust the president.

"When I speak to leadership, they constantly remind me that I have to represent my district,” Tlaib said. “This is an emergency for many of us.”

HURRY UP GUYS ITS AN EMERGENCY WE NEED TO PASS ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT THAT WILL GET SHOT DOWN IN THE SENATE ORANGE MAN BAD
 
Why do they care so much about racial diversity? Dems are the only ones that truly care about what race you are and they think that it's an important part of your life.
Because white people are the only race in the United States that is repressed from asserting their racial identity and advocating for their own race; every other race and religion does what comes naturally. And promoting minorities asserting their race and religions is how the Democrats win votes, which is literally the reason why they want a more "diverse" America. If it weren't for these imported voters the Dems wouldn't have won a presidential election in decades.

Diversity just means "anti-white." And as the number of non-white people in the US increases, the hostility towards white people does too. It's going to get a lot worse before it gets better, if it ever does get better.
 
Barely related, but this thought just hit me. If you mailed a bunch of Cheetos/Doritos to AOC, Omar, et al would it they call it a threat/hate crime because Twitter kept calling Trump Cheetos/dorito Hitler? ?
 
Because white people are the only race in the United States that is repressed from asserting their racial identity and advocating for their own race; every other race and religion does what comes naturally. And promoting minorities asserting their race and religions is how the Democrats win votes, which is literally the reason why they want a more "diverse" America. If it weren't for these imported voters the Dems wouldn't have won a presidential election in decades.

Diversity just means "anti-white." And as the number of non-white people in the US increases, the hostility towards white people does too. It's going to get a lot worse before it gets better, if it ever does get better.
You have to wonder why did this all start in the first place? What was so wrong with championing for the blue collar American worker? The issue with going this route is reality doesn't align with it. Even if by some sheer nightmare come true they did change the US, what do they do about the world?

Most of the world gives no fucks about this shit, and it will only weaken the US as we stop caring about real tangible results in favor of "feels". Is the Dem part truly this petty, that they would gladly nosedive our country into a shithole if it meant that finally, they win every election?

Most of these are rhetorical questions, I already know it's a "yes". Of course I don't think this of all Dem voters, but just of the national stage when I say that the Dem party is clearly anti-American. Just about every policy I see them push is to the detriment of our country, just so they can keep crawling their way up in a bucket of crabs.
 
Back
Top Bottom