Science New brain implant can decode a person's 'inner monologue' - "What was going on in that head of hers? It was exasperating, really, Mae thought, not knowing. It was an afront, a deprivation, to herself and to the world."

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Source: https://www.livescience.com/health/...-implant-can-decode-a-persons-inner-monologue
Archive: https://archive.is/I8uXc

New brain implant can decode a person's 'inner monologue'​

By Skyler Ware
A new brain-computer interface can decode a person's inner speech, which could help people with paralysis communicate.

5ZrQcyWfauNJuM7hMaxoSQ-650-80.jpg.webp

Scientists have developed a brain-computer interface that can capture and decode a person's inner monologue.

The results could help people who are unable to speak communicate more easily with others. Unlike some previous systems, the new brain-computer interface does not require people to attempt to physically speak. Instead, they just have to think what they want to say.

"This is the first time we've managed to understand what brain activity looks like when you just think about speaking," study co-author Erin Kunz, an electrical engineer at Stanford University, said in a statement. "For people with severe speech and motor impairments, [brain-computer interfaces] capable of decoding inner speech could help them communicate much more easily and more naturally."

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) allow people who are paralyzed to use their thoughts to control assistive devices, such as prosthetic hands, or to communicate with others. Some systems involve implanting electrodes in a person's brain, while others use MRI to observe brain activity and relate it to thoughts or actions.

But many BCIs that help people communicate require a person to physically attempt to speak in order to interpret what they want to say. This process can be tiring for people who have limited muscle control. Researchers in the new study wondered if they could instead decode inner speech.

In the new study, published Aug. 14 in the journal Cell, Kunz and her colleagues worked with four people who were paralyzed by either a stroke or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a degenerative disease that affects the nerve cells that help control muscles. The participants had electrodes implanted in their brains as part of a clinical trial for controlling assistive devices with thoughts. The researchers trained artificial intelligence models to decode inner speech and attempted speech from electrical signals picked up by the electrodes in the participants' brains.

The models decoded sentences that participants internally "spoke" in their minds with up to 74% accuracy, the team found. They also picked up on a person's natural inner speech during tasks that required it, such as remembering the order of a series of arrows pointing in different directions.

Inner speech and attempted speech produced similar patterns of brain activity in the brain's motor cortex, which controls movement, but inner speech produced weaker activity overall.

One ethical dilemma with BCIs is that they could potentially decode people's private thoughts rather than what they intended to say aloud. The differences in brain signals between attempted and inner speech suggest that future brain-computer interfaces could be trained to ignore inner speech entirely, study co-author Frank Willett, an assistant professor of neurosurgery at Stanford, said in the statement.

As an additional safeguard against the current system unintentionally decoding a person's private inner speech, the team developed a password-protected BCI. Participants could use attempted speech to communicate at any time, but the interface started decoding inner speech only after they spoke the passphrase "chitty chitty bang bang" in their minds.

Though the BCI wasn't able to decode complete sentences when a person wasn't explicitly thinking in words, advanced devices may be able to do so in the future, the researchers wrote in the study.

"The future of BCIs is bright," Willett said in the statement. "This work gives real hope that speech BCIs can one day restore communication that is as fluent, natural, and comfortable as conversational speech."
 
I'm gonna call.... wait, no.... I'll let you read my internal monologue on this one! I'm sure you'll get it right.
 
I'm gonna call.... wait, no.... I'll let you read my internal monologue on this one! I'm sure you'll get it right.
I'm getting "Naggerfiggit" and at 75% accuracy I think I may have got it right.
 
I would not subject myself to use this (because it's highly invasive, the hardware itself), but it would be fun to see how it would go when I start thinking about several things at the same time at fast speed with no words, but sounds rather, than convey similar feelings as concepts. See the fine-tuning between what is captured as "words", or other type of qualia.

Speedrun to short-circuit the AI sounds like a good experiment, specially if you are a bit crazy.
 
Reminder that a large portion of the population apparently has no inner monologue and merely translates their dumb, animalistic thoughts into words.
I’m convinced that this is a Venn diagram between people who consume exclusively passive-narrative media like television and video games, as opposed to reading, and Reddit users, who have been at best conditioned against any actual thinking and have a significant percentage missing actual chunks of brain.

tl;dr if people read more books without pictures/pornography this wouldn’t be the case.
 
Reminder that a large portion of the population apparently has no inner monologue and merely translates their dumb, animalistic thoughts into words.
That's so wild to me as someone who has a very active inner monologue and a vivid imagination. I know it's true but it's just such a foreign idea to me. Wtf is actually going on up there?

I would NEVER get a brain implant that would try and read my thoughts. Also I think in video and have multiple streams running at all times. I don't think AI would know what to make of it.
 
China will be using these to punish thoughtcrime within a decade.

Hell, America will be doing the same. "Hate crime" laws are already about what's in your head while you're committing a crime. Why wouldn't we go the same way?
 
I know it's true but it's just such a foreign idea to me. Wtf is actually going on up there?
They're not human! They don't have thoughts, they have 144p bioelectric snapshots. They don't have emotions, they have mimicry of what they think a human would emote like. Fleshy simulacra with a human shape.
 
China will be using these to punish thoughtcrime within a decade.

Hell, America will be doing the same. "Hate crime" laws are already about what's in your head while you're committing a crime. Why wouldn't we go the same way?
It's literally going to be minority report. You will get locked up for "crimes" you will commit in the future based on your thinking. They will have psychologists pushing out retarded papers saying "If you think X then you have Y% chance to do Z." The gov will step in and say "Even if there is a chance you wont commit the crimes we say you will commit it's just going to be safer for society if we lock you away."
 
They're gonna hook a brother up and the poor bastard is just gonna start squealing "OMG I'M SO HORNY REEEEE" over and over again in a mechanical voice.
 
What is with the obsession of invading every personal space with intrusive shit? They cant be satisfied with the waking world, now they want your inner thoughts and such?

Get me off this rock
 
Imagine trying not to even think the password.

apricot Vagina! Noooo, tuurn it off , turn it off. How could I think apricot? God damnit.
 
I wish I had an inner monologue. It would be better than the 5-10 versions of me shouting at each other all the time. Some times i can outdrink them, but that is not always an option.
 
Back
Top Bottom