Netflix's "Cuties" - The Preteen Sexual Objectification Equivalent of "Funny Games"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So if you search on google, the third autocomplete result for cuties is parents guide. The IMDB one. Nigga, the film is rated NC-17. Why would you show it to kids. I know other films that definitely should be shown to kids have em, but why is this the third autocomplete result.

Screenshot_2020-09-13_21-36-20.png Screenshot_2020-09-13_21-35-58.png Screenshot_2020-09-13_21-35-47.png

Bing and DDG don't have it even included.

Michael Jacks0n said:
The film should have had a main antagonist who was a stereotypical Harvey Weinstein type who's seen sexually abusing the girls in the film, to illustrate how bad pedophilia is and how minors are corrupted in the entertainment industry. Unfortunately (((we all know why a movie like that would never get made)))
Click to expand...
The Assistant is pretty much that film. Just with adults instead of kids. And real fucking boring according to some.
 
Michael Jacks0n said:
The film should have had a main antagonist who was a stereotypical Harvey Weinstein type who's seen sexually abusing the girls in the film, to illustrate how bad pedophilia is and how minors are corrupted in the entertainment industry. Unfortunately (((we all know why a movie like that would never get made)))
Click to expand...

And to make it especially authentic, to get a role in it you have to blow some disgusting, fat Jew. They could go through a few hundred girls.
 
I don't know if this was posted yet but D'Angelo Wallace uploaded the video as he promised


I'm glad that some left-wing, so-called "woke" people were able to call this out. It doesn't matter what your political views are, the left and right should work together against this. Yet there are still some people (especially from the left) who would defend it even with the knowledge that the film involved actual sexualized children.
 
Just finished watching this pedo flick. It reminds me of how in some pornos they will have a lame story just to create a scenario for the porn actors to screw each other. There is scene after scene where something happens and it's another excuse for them to show young girls bodies or dancing sexually again.

Towards the end of the movie there is a scene on a stairwell and it seemingly breaks the fourth wall. The girls all look directly at the camera while doing their sexual dances on a stairwell for seemingly no reason at all. (Or the possible reason is a celebration dance because they won some competition.) It's not clear who is recording them doing this and the scene blends into the next scene of them watching their fourth wall breaking stairwell dance on one of their phones. So it's not clear who recorded this scene and it seemed like another excuse to show the girls dancing sexually with more extreme perverted close ups.

Another example of a pointless scene that adds nothing to the plot is a fight they get in with another girl dance group. In this scene the Cuties get into a fight with another girl group the sassy swaggs or whatever the fuck they're called. They end up attacking the main character and pull her super tight leather or spandex pants down revealing her butt and the panties she's wearing.

So my conclusion is the film is a thinly veiled CP under the guise of being a coming of age story with tons of gratuitous sexual imagery of children.
 
Last edited:
3119967d0c said:
You people condemning Netflix for releasing this movie are just involved in 'cancel culture'. Shape up, guys
View attachment 1594765
(from an editor of the Koch crime family's 'Reason' magazine)
View attachment 1594770
Click to expand...
I've watched it. Imagine my shock when I found it was pedo bait. The girls are engaging in this behavior in an act of rebellion, the idea that it critiques hyper-sexualization in society is bunk when the society in the movie wants the opposite. It fails to be cautionary tale about risky behavior and unhealthy acts of rebellion when the worst that happens is the girl's family gets mad at her... And are painted in a negative light by the movie for it and react in insane ways (They have, like, an exorcism where the girl twerks...) that very few actual parents would.
 
3119967d0c said:
You people condemning Netflix for releasing this movie are just involved in 'cancel culture'. Shape up, guys
View attachment 1594765
(from an editor of the Koch crime family's 'Reason' magazine)
View attachment 1594770
Click to expand...
These people can't seem to get it through their thick skulls. The clips are all anyone needs. The context is completely irrelevant, the purpose of the movie is completely irrelevant. In order for that footage to even exist, those children had to be sexually exploited by a bunch of adults. None of the defenders are actually addressing this issue.
 
Clint Westwood said:
People like Kitty Jung could have been used, but that's still kinda creepy if the person doesn't know that she's over 18. My real issue is the perverted cameraman doing those butt shots while the girls girating and twerk and everyone just going along with it for some reason, and that scene where they do it in front of a couple of guards. They didn't look at this and think that this was an issue?

They also could have taken the time to, you know, make the movie not boring?

Either way, they could have taken the route the film Thirteen went. That was much more tame than whatever the hell they were doing here.
Click to expand...
It's interesting how you mention the camera-man thing, because a camera-man's ethics does come into play when taking a gig.

I had a friend who got offered to be second camera for that HBO show Cathouse, but he turned it down because he didn't want his name associated with it (and this would've been his first major gig). Ethics plays a big role in taking certain jobs like that.
 
I'm pissed and disturbed at the sheer amount of people who have been defending this movie.

I refuse to watch the movie, but I have read about the content that is in it. And yes, it's even worse than sane people feared.

Okay, so the movie's "message" is that child exploitation is bad. However, it's crystal clear that the people involved in the making of this film exploited children in order to make that message. It's like someone making an actual snuff film to tell everyone that murder is bad-- doesn't make it any less of a snuff film.

This movie becomes even more disturbing when you hear that they auditioned hundreds of girls without acting experience. It really makes you think about what in the hell could have gone on during those auditions. Sickening! And critics are praising this. Unbelievable.

You know, years ago, I made fun of Evangelical Christian types who were all like "Once you legalize gay marriage, it's going to start a slippery slope into things like pedophilia and beastiality!" Look at where we are culturally right now. Pedophiles are undoubtedly on the rise because they are guilting stupid people into supporting them, because those useful idiots are so scared of being called bigots. I am a PROUD bigot against pedophiles, and I'm not in the least bit sorry. Your mind can only be so open before your brain falls out, I say.

Those crazy Christians sound far less crazy these days, as it turns out ...
 
Secret Asshole said:
It has an 11 year old blowing up a used condom.

It has a child taking pictures of her genitals and sending them out over the internet.

It has an 11 year old in tight leather pants shaking her ass.

Its fucking disgusting. When you make a movie like this, you don't use actual fucking children. Except for the French, because they're pedophiles. Its fucking disgusting. The 10 minute YouTube review told me all I needed to fucking know. I am not going to watch this disgusting shit.

They'll censor fucking anime, but actual children with crotch shots and ass shots and dry humping is fine. Go fuck yourselves.
Click to expand...
Again, why can't we cancel both Netflix and the French at the same time?
 
The more videos he makes, the more convinced I am that the Buttsmarn is a KF lurker. Or if not, he should be.

 
murgatroid said:
Reading The Verge piece defending Cuties and associating it with QAnon. Then I notice their logo closely resembles the pedo symbol of smaller triangles within triangles. Not surprised.

Why ‘Cancel Netflix’ is trending
How the streamer’s bad marketing poster mutated into a QAnon conspiracy theory and harassment campaign

View attachment 1593758

View attachment 1593757
Click to expand...

This is the progtard defense for pedophilia.

I have progtard family members who whenever you talk about pedophilia "Oh, Asshole, its just a Qanon making a big deal about pedophilia." And he brings up Qanon. All. the. fucking. time. I kept telling him it was 4chan bullshit that got out of hand and only conspiracy nuts believe and is not anywhere close to a majority opinion, he wouldn't listen. I swear to fucking christ if my family brings up QAnon again I'm going to scream. Everyone was once alt-right, now they're all Qanon and both at the same time.

If you put together a QAnon gathering you'd get like 15 fucking people.

murgatroid said:
Another film with adult content that deals with social issues better is Fish Tank. From my memory it clearly created the fucked up atmosphere of the main characters environment and the actress in the film was legal age but could pass as the age of the character she was portraying.

View attachment 1594100
Click to expand...

Because this is how its been done since time immemorial? Just like 15-16 year old anime characters don't look anything like 15-16 year olds in real life, actors will portray teenagers or young teens in their 20s and 30s. And if you can get an actor or actress who can look the part but is of age, even better.

Films that touch upon childhood sexuality directly involving children DON'T CAST CHILDREN. PERIOD. They don't. They cast of-age people. While 'Cuties' would still be kind of creepy if it cast older actresses, it would be NOWHERE NEAR this level of revulsion. You'd probably get more people just mocking it for how creepy it was and then moving on after a day or two, IF THAT. Here we are, nearly at page 70.

It also probably wouldn't have won any fucking awards, because pedophiles wouldn't be able to masturbate to it knowing that there were normal-aged actresses playing the part.

Observotron said:
Twitter's a lost cause, so much so that some artists I follow actually have begun to stop posting their work on it. Think about that, a platform to potentially get work and 'free' publicity is such a cess-pool that people would rather not be associated with it. I wish I had the clout to make that kind of statement.
Click to expand...

Well, the minority of people on Twitter make most of the tweets. And that most normal people have been either banned or chased off the platform.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom