Science Neopronoun 'Ze' added to Dictionary - Help us Obi-Wan\Kenobi, we've fucked up again.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

thepostmillennial.com

CLOWN WORLD: Neopronoun ‘Ze’ added to Dictionary

What began with men wishing to be referred to as “she/her” has now devolved into a festival of madness where people express their “demon” pronouns, “ghost” pronouns, or “dirt” pronouns.
thepostmillennial.com thepostmillennial.com

​

CLOWN WORLD: Neopronoun 'Ze' added to Dictionary​

What began with men wishing to be referred to as "she/her" has now devolved into a festival of madness where people express their "demon" pronouns, "ghost" pronouns, or "dirt" pronouns.

1671465908812.png

​
Neopronouns have become all the range among the non-binary set, who wish to express not only that they identify as neither male nor female, but that they identify as something separate, special, and apart from that which the rest of the normies can truly understand.

Now, Dictionary.com, which recently declared "woman" the word of the year simply due to the confusion caused by the term now being inclusive of men who identify as women, has added the neo-pronouns sie, ve, xe, ze, and zie to the list that already included he, she, and they.



The word woman is defined as anyone who "identifies as female," though it's unclear what "identifying" as a biological sex that one is not actually means.

So special are those in this subset of the LGBTQIA+ group that they have come up with pronouns for themselves that are as unique as DNA, intended for use by those who are referring to these people in the third person. And Dictionary.com has embraced them.


Peter Boghossian posted screenshots of the words, and the definition for "ze," which reads "the person being discussed or last mentioned (used as a neopronoun in place of the gendered pronouns he and she). It gives the example "My friend didn't want to go to the party, but ze got up and danced when hir favorite song came on!"

It is unclear how a listener would understand that hir was differentiated from her.
​

Colleges and universities go out of their way to embrace this pronoun subset, giving instructions on what to do if you accidentally offend someone who you referred to in the third person, meaning it's likely that this misreferred to person is not even present. One should "Admit the mistake and correct yourself as soon as you can," says Penn State.

​
Wild Woman Writing Club responded that neopronouns are simply another denial of reality in a digital world.

"In the digital age, there is no one 'the dictionary', just countless reality-denialism activists working to ‘queer’ the definition of woman & obscure sex via idiotic ‘neo pronouns’ in their tech ‘engagement’ jobs," she wrote.

Preferred pronouns are decidedly for the self-obsessed, who use them to demand that others refer to them in a specific way even when they are not present. What began with men wishing to be referred to as "she/her" has now devolved into a festival of madness where people express their "demon" pronouns, "ghost" pronouns, or "dirt" pronouns. It is another step in turning one's self into an avatar.

Proponents of preferred neopronouns issue endless videos explaining to viewers how to use these pronouns. One TikToker teaches how to use a nearly infinite variety of pronouns, like "shark/sharks," "flower/flowers," "that/thats," and so many, many more.

​
Woke teachers go out of their way to "affirm" students' pronouns, and to keep those pronouns secret from parents. Some parents use props, like a doll, to train their children to use parents' preferred pronouns. Even the US Navy has issued their directives on using preferred pronouns.

___
Twitter embeds don't seem to work so you'll have to visit the site where article is originate from, or watch an archive... #1666 in Queue at this moment.
 
Last edited:
Click to expand...
Maybe now Word can stop red-lining "ze" every time I write sentences in a French accent.

"Hon hon, ze fa-guts' ree-cis growin'. Ho, look a'ze time, mon chéri, iz surrend'r 'our a'gin. Hon hon, hon hon, ho-hon hon!"
 
That's weird, I haven't been confused about the definition of "woman" at all. Seems pretty clear cut to me.

On the upside this does provide unique opportunities to troll during a game of Scrabble. Imagine starting off with "Ze".
 
I have stated this in relation to other articles about dictionaries wrongly changing the definitions of words.

The descriptivist contagion that has been all the rage since the 60s is the problem. Just because people use a word incorrectly or spell it incorrectly does not mean it should be blessed or endorsed by a lexicon or gtammar. People spell "all right" as "alright," people utter the word "irregardless."

For those interested, I highly recommend an article by David Foster Wallace. I finally found the unabridged edition. https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~drkelly/DFWAuthorityAndAmericanUsage2005.pdf

Also, pronouns are very intimate to a language, probably the most intimate component of a relation and generally do not change over centuries.

The concern I have is it only takes one or two generations to be raised in the midst of this won't know any different. Millennials already trot out descriptivist dogma, convinced that prescriptivsm is some sort of empy dogma.
It seems academia and the institutions of education have been irredeemably infected with these lunatics. When English teachers cannot or will not teach proper grammar, when they do not understand that new words or improper use or spelling of words need to be used for many decades before they are blessed by recognition by the lexiconical and grammaticsl authorities, then succeeding generations become immersed in it without correction.
That's why I think we need right-wing authoritarianism. You won't purge these odious figures from centers of cultural and political power by "voting."

Europe and the West need a few right-wing strongmen, modeled after Franco, Pinochet, some of the others, but with more than just a bit of Mao to properly purge and liquidate these imposters in education and academia and make room for old school "snoots" who hold the line and teach Shakespeare and Milton and the other dead white males, the literary masters who have written and uttered the very best of Western literature.
 
Last edited:
Norbert the Tiger said:
I have stated this in relation to other articles about dictionaries wrongly changing the definitions of words.

The descriptivist contagion that has been all the rage since the 60s is the problem. Just because people use a word incorrectly or spell it incorrectly does not mean it should be blessed or endorsed by a lexicon or gtammar. People spell "all right" as "alright," people utter the word "irregardless."
For those interested, I highly recommend an article by David Foster Wallace. I finally found the unabridged edition. https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~drkelly/DFWAuthorityAndAmericanUsage2005.pdf
Also, pronouns are very intimate to a language, probably the most intimate component of a relation and generally do not change over centuries.
The concern I have is it only takes one or two generations to be raised in the midst of this won't know any different. Millennials already trot out descriptivist dogma, convinced that prescriptivsm is some sort of empy dogma.
It seems academia and the institutions of education have been irredeemably infected with these lunatics. When English teachers cannot or will not teach proper grammar, when they do not understand that new words or improper use or spelling of words need to be used for many decades before they are blessed by recognition by the authority, then succeeding generations become immersed in it without correction.
That's why I think we need right-wing authoritarianism. You won't purge these odious figures from centers of cultural and political power by "voting."
Europe and the West need a few right,-wing.strongmen, Franco Pinochet, but.wotj more than just a bit.of.Maomto.properly purge and liquidate these imposters in education and academia and make room for old school "snoots" who hold the line teach Shakespeare.and Milton and the other.desd white males.
Click to expand...

Vote fascism because of a 2 letter dictionary word, lol

What does david foster wallace have in common with like half of trannies?
 
Lemmingwiser said:
Vote fascism because of a 2 letter dictionary word, lol

What does david foster wallace have in common with like half of trannies?
Click to expand...
To stop the utter denegration and degeneration of culture and society, of which language is an important part. Ze is not a word.
Mind you, there are many who would like to go into academia and have the intellectual prowess to do so, but no they would never it through the gauntlet. Someone who actually believes in the Western canon, who understands that dictionaries and grammars cannot simply list and catalogue all the errors and idiosynchrasies across the spectrum of written and verbal usage, would never make it, not through graduate school and certainly would get rooted out in trying to get a PhD.
 
Norbert the Tiger said:
To stop the utter denegration and degeneration of culture and society, of which language is an important part. Ze is not a word.
Mind you, there are many who would like to go into academia and have the intellectual prowess to do so, but no they would never it through the gauntlet. Someone who actually believes in the Western canon, who understands that dictionaries and grammars cannot simply list and catalogue all the errors and idiosynchrasies across the spectrum of written and verbal usage, would never make it, not through graduate school and certainly would get rooted out in trying to get a PhD.
Click to expand...
Look, you're a scholar and a gent for quoting david foster wallace, who was as miserable as he was brilliant. But they've been anally raping western canon for decades.

When in 2014 the wikipedia article on the frankfurt school got scrubbed and then replaced by the frankfurt school conspiracy theory article (presented as flat earth nonsense), I started to wonder if maybe there was something to it. I bought a couple of classics, aristotle, plato. I decided to do a background check on those writing the forewords of 5 classic books. Each of those who wrote the forewwords were either directly from the frankfurt school or their spouse was.

Then you can start looking into all the academics that laid the groundwork for modern movements and fields of thought and you realize this isn't just some feminism gone a little too far or something like that, you realize that it's gone exactly in the direction designed from the start. 5-10 decades of consecutive work built on each other. Western canon undefended will die or mutate, much like christians decided what of the greeks they wanted to preserve and what they did not, those with power and influence now will decide what of the western canon they want to keep and throw away. Saving illicit archives is easier than ever (glances at collection of david irving and eustace mullins books).

But if people weren't able to rebel against the genocide of mass immigration, or the discovery of royal pedophilia whether Epstein or Dutroux related, then they sure as hell won't rebel for literary reasons.
 
Lemmingwiser said:
Vote fascism because of a 2 letter dictionary word, lol
Click to expand...
People generally want to be left alone to raise their families. If as a government / culture setting force you keep the lights on, repair the roads, don’t start any major wars or get too freaky and keep things ticking over, then people will put up with quite a bit.
There is a limit though. Over this side of the pond we’ve already seen what happens when things get extreme. People react. I don’t think the average Joe particularly wants fascism either, but I think I can say with a reasonable degree of certainty that people would rather have a spot of facism than full on communist degeneracy.
Yes this is just a pronoun. Stack it on top of the lights going off, ten percent inflation, people being cold, poor, and bombarded with commie propaganda and degenerate threats to their kids and you’ve got a recipe for the next really popular strong man to make some gains.
If I had a choice between normalcy, commies or facists I’m voting normal. But if it’s either communism or fascism , Then pass the jackboots.
 
Lemmingwiser said:
Look, you're a scholar and a gent for quoting david foster wallace, who was as miserable as he was brilliant. But they've been anally raping western canon for decades.

When in 2014 the wikipedia article on the frankfurt school got scrubbed and then replaced by the frankfurt school conspiracy theory article (presented as flat earth nonsense), I started to wonder if maybe there was something to it. I bought a couple of classics, aristotle, plato. I decided to do a background check on those writing the forewords of 5 classic books. Each of those who wrote the forewwords were either directly from the frankfurt school or their spouse was.

Then you can start looking into all the academics that laid the groundwork for modern movements and fields of thought and you realize this isn't just some feminism gone a little too far or something like that, you realize that it's gone exactly in the direction designed from the start. 5-10 decades of consecutive work built on each other. Western canon undefended will die or mutate, much like christians decided what of the greeks they wanted to preserve and what they did not, those with power and influence now will decide what of the western canon they want to keep and throw away. Saving illicit archives is easier than ever (glances at collection of david irving and eustace mullins books).

But if people weren't able to rebel against the genocide of mass immigration, or the discovery of royal pedophilia whether Epstein or Dutroux related, then they sure as hell won't rebel for literary reasons.
Click to expand...
Now this post I can agree with. Just because the remedy is unlikely does not diminish the fact that it is required and would work.
If I had a choice between normalcy, commies or facists I’m voting normal. But if it’s either communism or fascism , Then pass the jackboots.
Click to expand...
Things have not been normal or right since the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand. Only very drastic measures, however unlikely, can fix these problems. Whether one calls it fascism, far-right authoritarianism, a rose by any other name...
a recipe for the next really popular strong man to make some gains.
Click to expand...

I hope this time, if the improbable happens, the junta that would save us all plays for KEEPS. I am alluding to the one thing I really approve of about Mao, ie how he quickly eradicated China's centuries long opium epidemic. Hint--its was not by playing patty cake.
 
Last edited:
Neopronouns have become all the range...
Click to expand...

Libby Emmons​

Libby Emmons is the Editor-in-chief for The Post Millennial. MFA Columbia University BA Sarah Lawrence College. She has been published in the New York Post The Federalist others. @libbyemmons
Click to expand...
All these credentials and you don't know the basic idiom "all the rage".
 
Otterly said:
People generally want to be left alone to raise their families. If as a government / culture setting force you keep the lights on, repair the roads, don’t start any major wars or get too freaky and keep things ticking over, then people will put up with quite a bit.
There is a limit though. Over this side of the pond we’ve already seen what happens when things get extreme. People react. I don’t think the average Joe particularly wants fascism either, but I think I can say with a reasonable degree of certainty that people would rather have a spot of facism than full on communist degeneracy.
Yes this is just a pronoun. Stack it on top of the lights going off, ten percent inflation, people being cold, poor, and bombarded with commie propaganda and degenerate threats to their kids and you’ve got a recipe for the next really popular strong man to make some gains.
If I had a choice between normalcy, commies or facists I’m voting normal. But if it’s either communism or fascism , Then pass the jackboots.
Click to expand...
The fact that people react is why they'll lose. Reactionary movements are generally brief and weak. The only succesful one historically I can think of is protestantism.

But Trump, Farage, Baudet, all of the succesful 2016ish reactionary movements ended weak and emasculated. About as succesful as Boudica, a couple of won skirmishes and then destroyed absolutely despite outnumbering the enemy.
To win you need conviction, not some mealy mouthed uhhh I want normalcy, but I guess I can't have that, so I'll have some type of fascism I guesssss.

You need to constantly take the initiative and you need absolute conviction that you're doing the right thing. I don't see that type of strength anywhere, politically, besides from WEF types.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom