Opinion Nationalism on the Decline

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

OPINION: Nationalism on the Decline
by Lawrence Wittner | Jun 29, 2021 | Opinion/Letters

Although, beginning in about 2015, nationalist political parties made enormous advances in countries around the world, more recently they have been on the wane.

The nationalist surge was led by a new generation of rightwing populist demagogues who, feeding on public discontent with widespread immigration and economic stagnation, achieved startling political breakthroughs. Matteo Salvini of Italy, Geert Wilders of the Netherlands, and Marine Le Pen of France catapulted their fringe political movements into major party status. In Britain, Nigel Farage’s United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) startled mainstream parties by winning a referendum calling for Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union. Donald Trump, championing an “America First” policy, shocked political pundits by emerging victorious in the 2016 U.S. presidential race. Two years later, in Brazil, the flamboyant Jair Bolsonaro, campaigning under the slogan “Brazil Above Everything,” was easily elected president of his country. In May 2019, Narendra Modi’s BJP, a Hindu nationalist party, won a landslide election victory in India.
As the acknowledged leader of the rightwing, nationalist uprising in these and other nations, Trump forged close contacts with his overseas counterparts and pulled the U.S. government out of international treaties, as well as out of global institutions. “Wise leaders always put the good of their own people and their own country first,” he admonished the UN General Assembly in September 2019. “The future does not belong to globalists. The future belongs to patriots.”
But, even as he spoke, the nationalist momentum was beginning to falter. In Europe, every nationalist political success during 2019 was matched by a defeat. Although, in Spain, the small, anti-immigrant Vox Party gained seats, in Austria, the nationalist Freedom Party experienced major setbacks, while Britain’s once-powerful UKIP and Greece’s rabid Golden Dawn movement virtually disappeared. Meanwhile, in Turkey, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s nationalist party suffered stinging election defeats in the nation’s three largest cities.

Things went further downhill for the nationalists in 2020. A loss by Modi’s BJP in Delhi that February added to its string of regional election defeats. In Italy, Salvini’s Northern League suffered an election rout and the center-left Democratic Party replaced it in the coalition government. Meanwhile, in France, Le Pen’s National Rally party went down to a resounding defeat in the July 2020 local elections and, in November, Brazil’s Bolsonaro was humiliated when most of the candidates he campaigned for failed to win election. Perhaps the most significant nationalist defeat occurred that November in the United States, where Trump lost his presidential re-election campaign by 7 million votes and his radicalized Republican Party failed to recapture the House of Representatives, which it had lost in 2018.
This year, the nationalist defeats have turned into a rout. In January, Trump’s Republicans lost special Senate elections, ending their party’s control of the U.S. Senate. In March, Erdogan’s political control of Turkey crumbled still further, as polls found support for his nationalist party slipping dramatically. This May, Modi’s BJP lost another regional election.
Much the same occurred this June. In Germany, where the nationalist Alternative for Germany was projected to score an upset victory in a state election, it drew a disappointing 20.8 percent of the vote—not much more than half the percentage garnered by the Christian Democratic victors and considerably less than the total secured by the leftwing parties. In Brazil, clear signs emerged that the Bolsonaro regime, with record unpopularity, was tottering toward collapse. Finally, in France, where Marine Le Pen’s party was predicted to have a good chance of triumphing in six of the country’s 13 regional elections, it ended up defeated in every one of them.

As the nationalist tide has receded, governments have turned to reviving the international institutions and agreements battered during the previous years. These include the United Nations, the World Health Organization, the Paris Climate Accords, and key nuclear disarmament agreements. In another sign of their willingness to engage in global action, major governments have proposed a global minimum tax on corporations.

How can this change in the fortunes of nationalist parties be explained?
One factor behind the political turnabout is that the style, policies, and behavior of some of the leading nationalist politicians set off alarm bells in the minds of many people and political parties about authoritarianism, and even fascism. Some of these politicians, in fact, displayed fascist tendencies and, also, encouraged violent, rightwing action by their supporters. Consequently, uneasy voters and parties, anxious to preserve democracy and political freedom, were willing to make political compromises, such as uniting behind the most electable alternative to the nationalist candidate.

A deeper reason, though, is that, in a world faced with global problems such as a disease pandemic, climate catastrophe, a nuclear arms race, and economic inequality, a nationalist approach doesn’t make much sense. Recognizing this, most of the public gravitates toward global solutions. A Pew Research Center poll in the summer of 2020 found that 81 percent of the 14,276 people interviewed in 14 nations thought that “countries around the world should act as part of a global community that works together to solve problems.” Some 76 percent approved of the role of the United Nations in promoting human rights and 74 percent in promoting peace, while 63 percent said that the WHO had done a good job handling the COVID-19 crisis.

Of course, despite the recent setbacks experienced by nationalist parties, they are far from dead. They have succeeded in establishing themselves as part of the political landscape and today govern a variety of countries, including Brazil, Hungary, India, Poland, and Turkey. In the United States, the Trump-dominated Republican Party controls numerous state governments and stands a reasonable chance of recapturing control of the federal government.

Even so, the political tide has recently turned against nationalism and, consequently, possibilities have re-emerged for addressing global problems on a global basis.

Lawrence Wittner

Lawrence Wittner is a prominent American historian who has combined intellectual life with activism for peace and social justice. He’s the author of nine books; his book, ‘One World or None’ was awarded the 1995 Warren Kuehl Book Prize of the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations. He writes for PeaceVoice.info, a program of the Oregon Peace Institute.
 
Just because I want the government to crash and burn doesn't mean I don't still love this country and want us to stop focusing on the rest of the world. If anything it means I love this country more.
 
Those "nationalists" are just pawns. They are the fake opposition promoted by the International High Finance. I would hardly consider Trump, UKIP, or Bolsonaro "nationalist". All those parties and individuals are just right-wing populists. There is nothing of greater essence about them. Also, it does not mention that the Golden Dawn was a ridiculously corrupt party. Additionally, Turkey independently of the ruling political party was and will be nationalist. Unfortunately, Europe is dead.
 
Lawrence is so prominent his brilliant insights are in the pages of a tiny outlet.


Link the studies Larry.

This stinks of propaganda and whoever paid for it is not getting much ROI.
Thing is as well, the way its worded is so vague that you can almost always get the answers you want.

Do you think your country should work with other nations to combat global problems? Yeah, nationalists don't hate other nations, in fact we think friendships are a good thing.

The question would be better put as this.

Do you think your country should be run by unelected, unknown rich people from all over the world as a plaything for their power games. As well as lose all your culture and submit to becoming a consumer with few rights and permanently asking for forgiveness for things that didn't even fucking happen, and if they did, it was so long ago no one is really clear on what actually happened. Would you support being a slave, a walking bag of consumption?

Maybe then they would get a clearer picture of what people think of globalhomo.
 
I guarantee you nationalism will rise again in a time of crisis when the those in power believe stirring up nationalistic rhetoric will work to their advantage. Retaliating against Al-Quaeda during the Bush II years was widely supported by the public in the months following 9/11. You didn't really get that this time around with Trump during the covid outbreak last year when he very easily could, nor are you seeing Biden tap into the well of potential patriotism either, instead opting for vague platitudes about "trusting the science" and diversity hires and whatnot.

If there was an honest to God war on our shores, or more realistically a geological catastrophe like Yellowstone supervolcano erupting, you better believe even the most complacent of niggercattle, as many farmers here describe them, would easily be whipped up into a sense of nationalist fervor with the threat of losing their standard of living forever. While it may just be surface level nationalism brought on by a risk of losing the material comforts Americans are so committed to protecting, but history tells us not to underestimate angry, desperate retards in large numbers.
 
I guarantee you nationalism will rise again in a time of crisis when the those in power believe stirring up nationalistic rhetoric will work to their advantage. Retaliating against Al-Quaeda during the Bush II years was widely supported by the public in the months following 9/11. You didn't really get that this time around with Trump during the covid outbreak last year when he very easily could, nor are you seeing Biden tap into the well of potential patriotism either, instead opting for vague platitudes about "trusting the science" and diversity hires and whatnot.

If there was an honest to God war on our shores, or more realistically a geological catastrophe like Yellowstone supervolcano erupting, you better believe even the most complacent of niggercattle, as many farmers here describe them, would easily be whipped up into a sense of nationalist fervor with the threat of losing their standard of living forever. While it may just be surface level nationalism brought on by a risk of losing the material comforts Americans are so committed to protecting, but history tells us not to underestimate angry, desperate retards in large numbers.
The Yellowstone Supervolcano erupting would make me eternally happy.
 
The Yellowstone Supervolcano erupting would make me eternally happy.
Admittedly, same, and not just because I'm a couple thousand miles away from Wyoming.

Maybe it's my morbid fascination with 20th century dystopian literature, but I fear that the United States will get invariably worse as the government employs technology to exert more and more control over the general populace, to an extent that only an act of God could rouse Americans from being fat complacent whiners.
 
Back
Top Bottom