🪦 Deceased Nathan Larson / Tisane / Lysander / Leucosticte - Creepy pedo "incel" LOLbertarian Putin and Breivik lovechild.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
DrainRedRain said:
I had this impression when I was reading the screencaps in this thread. I think it is too convenient that a pedo would set up a forum talking about a very specific ''ideology'' and suddenly a flood of underage girls would follow him and act exactly the way he expected them to act.
Click to expand...
Agreed. Child molesters do groom their victims, but I was always under the impression that this was in a more manipulative way, giving their victims praise and attention they weren't getting elsewhere and reassuring them that the inappropriate behavior was perfectly fine and acceptable. This guy, on the other hand, openly argues in favor of stuff like raping your own children. I find it really unlikely that he'd find a whole internet community of True & Honest 12-year-old girls who are into him, no matter how bad their family life is.

Honestly? There are some underage girls over there, I believe that. BUT, they are very few. The loud, edgy, overtly sexual ones who act like top bitches are obviously grown men.
Click to expand...
The other thing I find weird about that faerie.su website is that it looks eerily similar (pastel colors, moe anime avatars, sparkly emote text, general trying-to-be-cute atmosphere) to stuff you see from "littles" in that creepy DD/LG fetish, i.e. people who are openly trying to act like they think children would. I'm guessing there's a whole lot of pedophiles over there roleplaying as preteens and sharing CP and pretending it's pictures of "themselves", in hopes that actual underage girls will join in.
 
Sperghetti said:
Agreed. Child molesters do groom their victims, but I was always under the impression that this was in a more manipulative way, giving their victims praise and attention they weren't getting elsewhere and reassuring them that the inappropriate behavior was perfectly fine and acceptable. This guy, on the other hand, openly argues in favor of stuff like raping your own children. I find it really unlikely that he'd find a whole internet community of True & Honest 12-year-old girls who are into him, no matter how bad their family life is.


The other thing I find weird about that faerie.su website is that it looks eerily similar (pastel colors, moe anime avatars, sparkly emote text, general trying-to-be-cute atmosphere) to stuff you see from "littles" in that creepy DD/LG fetish, i.e. people who are openly trying to act like they think children would. I'm guessing there's a whole lot of pedophiles over there roleplaying as preteens and sharing CP and pretending it's pictures of "themselves", in hopes that actual underage girls will join in.
Click to expand...
According to Belle DeMasi, a Youtuber keeping tabs on Nathan the past few months, there were actual teens that were groomed on Rapey. She talked to six of them on her Discord server.
 
Anne Hyroe said:
Based.
Click to expand...
97451595_110386390678415_670670443329355776_n.jpg
 
alreadyhome said:
What are foids?
Click to expand...
'Femoid' is basically a word for 'a female,' popular among incels, that is often said to stand for 'female humanoid' although most users probably don't care that much. It's a way of portraying females as scientific objects or mechanical beings, rather than as conscious beings. Some other subcultures, like the Groypers, have taken up the term because it's seen as offensive, misogynistic, and slightly obscure.

It's probably less embarrassing than Stormfront's adulation of 'the white wimminz,' but it's typically used in contexts involving the 'scientific' blackpill, hypergamy, etc., and hence it can come across awkwardly. However, because incel lingo tends to be used in a slightly ironic manner and quite loosely, others have taken to using it for offensive effect, and the media's earlier scaremongering around the incel community made it somewhat more popular because people would react to incel terminology with superstition or fear or shock. It's perhaps not as relevant now, though.
 
Doctor Placebo said:
I don't know where y'all are getting that @BoxerShorts47 is a libertarian, hardline or otherwise. He's basically a self-described fascist, and not in the leftie, "Everyone I don't like is a fascist" way. He wants a totalitarian state,
Click to expand...
I'm disappointed. I thought you were smarter than this. Fascism (Italian), Authoritarian (French-Latin) and Totalitarian (French-Latin) are foreign words that mean Leadership (English).


None of these words were even used before WW1. These terms are post modern rubbish.

Yes society needs leadership aka authority. This is why 1) antifascism , antiauthoritarianism just becomes anarchy. 2) Left never views their actions as fascists, authoritarian, totalitarian or tyrannical. People only apply these terms to other groups whose actions they claim hurt society and never to their actions which build society, that's viewed as progress. So one man's authoritarian is another person's progress.

So I'm disappointed that you're unironically using these post-modern neo-liberal trash nomenclature. I thought you were smart enough to see through this BS. I guess not. feelsbadman.jpg

Doctor Placebo said:
just one that lets grown men diddle twelve year old girls.
Click to expand...
You mean like the United States and Great Britain before ~1880-1900?
 
Anne Hyroe said:
A federal honeypot now, with any luck.
Click to expand...
I was optimistic about that being the case, but considering people told them about the shit that went on there years back and they did jack shit about it, it's probable they are still not caring, or they are trying to overcompensate for their negligence, which is a little too late IMO. Personally, i believe that they are weirdoes RP like it was formerly said, or in a best case scenario, people doing what the glowies didn't and trying to get info on those fuckers to then doxx them or try and get authorities that care to jail them up.
Clockwork_PurBle said:
No, I meant recently as in not 2020. I think it may be related to Animal Control and it happened around Christmas Day.
Click to expand...
You are probably thinking about Snakething, the pedozoophile that raped his own nephew.
 
Totally Awesome said:
According to Belle DeMasi, a Youtuber keeping tabs on Nathan the past few months, there were actual teens that were groomed on Rapey. She talked to six of them on her Discord server.
Click to expand...
Yup, I've heard the same. One was twelve years old. To get the confirmed tag on Rapey, girls had to take nude pictures with the site's name written on their bodies.
leuco.png

Here's Belle's youtube, for anyone who wants to see her vids:
 
Last edited:
Totally Awesome said:
According to Belle DeMasi, a Youtuber keeping tabs on Nathan the past few months, there were actual teens that were groomed on Rapey. She talked to six of them on her Discord server.
Click to expand...
Yeah, as I said, I believe there were some underage damaged girls over there, no doubt. But I think most of the girls were actually grown males acting like ''uwu rapey bait'' hoping to attract even more real girls and making them feel ''at home''. Like ''hey im a girl like you and i loooove being raped by ugly, bald middle aged men! come on lets be besties! share a pic!'' type of thing.

There's no doubt in my mind that preteens with damaged home lives and psychological issues will unfortunately be victims of groomers and perverted sick fucks. But I think most of time they are being baited by adult males pretending to be like them, and getting off with it.

The way some ''girls'' acted in that forum just screamed ''man posing as a woman'' to me.
 
Being tagged as a White Supremacist and a Pedo means he a walking dead man in Prison. The question which group is going to kill him first.

I put my money on the Aryan Nation as I remember correctly, they don't dig that shit of anyone or anything making them look bad.
 
BoxerShorts47 said:
I'm disappointed. I thought you were smarter than this. Fascism (Italian), Authoritarian (French-Latin) and Totalitarian (French-Latin) are foreign words that mean Leadership (English).


None of these words were even used before WW1. These terms are post modern rubbish.

Yes society needs leadership aka authority. This is why 1) antifascism , antiauthoritarianism just becomes anarchy. 2) Left never views their actions as fascists, authoritarian, totalitarian or tyrannical. People only apply these terms to other groups whose actions they claim hurt society and never to their actions which build society, that's viewed as progress. So one man's authoritarian is another person's progress.

So I'm disappointed that you're unironically using these post-modern neo-liberal trash nomenclature. I thought you were smart enough to see through this BS. I guess not. feelsbadman.jpg
Click to expand...
Everything you're saying is rubbish - totalitarian is a word for a tyrannical form of government and has a specific definition (one in which the ruler has unlimited power not restrained by constitution or law) - so yes, this distinguishes totalitarianism or tyranny from other forms of government. (Other words used to refer to it might include despotism, dictatorship, etc).

Totalitarianism is not equatable with "leadership". (Every country, including a country which has a democratic, Constitutional, or Republican form of government has "leadership", but this isn't "totalitarianism" - the governments are predicated on systems of checks and balances, as well as laws to prevent totalitarianism, or power being entirely consolidated in the hands of a single individual or entity).

Fascism is considered a form of totalitarianism, as are other historical governments such as Stalinism, Maoism, etc.

Tyrannical governments have been discussed as far back as ancient Greece (which Aristotle referred to as the worst form of government alongside anarchy) or the formation of Maga Carta (which abolished absolute monarchy and declared that no king was above the law).

In day to day speak by illiterate or intellectually dishonest folk, terms like "fascism/Nazism/totalitarian/authoritarian" just mean "anything someone doesn't like" rather than what they actually mean in serious political science/philosophy, for example:

*When Trump legally wins an election, the left screams "fascism/Nazism/tyranny!"

*When Biden legally wins an election, the right screams "fascism/Communism/socialism/tyranny!"

And so on and so on.


BoxerShorts47 said:
You mean like the United States and Great Britain before ~1880-1900?
Click to expand...
Wrong, even as far back as the days of ancient Athens, age of consent tended to be around 16 for girls regardless of whether or not there was any codified age of consent:

In Athens, a girl generally got married at about 16 – typically to a man twice her age, often a paternal uncle or an associate of her father’s.​

There are also plenty of historical anodes about blood feuds or vendettas being started by a brother or father who believed his sister or daughter had been raped or taken sexually advantage of (the philosophy behind modern Common Law acknowledges the role which private retribution played in more primitive times or circumstances, and that modern systems of law and justice evolved out of this).


Not to mention in the 1800s, it was legal to cut your prepubescent son's balls off so that his voice wouldn't deepen and that he'd have a higher vocal range for singing opera - what's your point?

Castrato - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
Last edited:
StraightShooter2 said:
Everything you're saying is rubbish - totalitarian is a word for a tyrannical form of government and has a specific definition (one in which the ruler has unlimited power not restrained by constitution or law) - so yes, this distinguishes totalitarianism or tyranny from other forms of government. (Other words used to refer to it might include despotism, dictatorship, etc).

Totalitarianism is not equatable with "leadership". (Every country, including a country which has a democratic, Constitutional, or Republican form of government has "leadership", but this isn't "totalitarianism" - the governments are predicated on systems of checks and balances, as well as laws to prevent totalitarianism, or power being entirely consolidated in the hands of a single individual or entity).

Fascism is considered a form of totalitarianism, as are other historical governments such as Stalinism, Maoism, etc.

Tyrannical governments have been discussed as far back as ancient Greece (which Aristotle referred to as the worst form of government alongside anarchy) or the formation of Maga Carta (which abolished absolute monarchy and declared that no king was above the law).

In day to day speak by illiterate or intellectually dishonest folk, terms like "fascism/Nazism/totalitarian/authoritarian" just mean "anything someone doesn't like" rather than what they actually mean in serious political science/philosophy, for example:

*When Trump legally wins an election, the left screams "fascism/Nazism/tyranny!"

*When Biden legally wins an election, the right screams "fascism/Communism/socialism/tyranny!"

And so on and so on.
Click to expand...
This is all just abstract garbage.

1. Most obvious real world contradiction is that every "constitutional" nation throws out their constitutions during times of crisis. Right now we're essentially under Marshall Law with COVID. Don't like the lockdown? Too bad. Where in the US Const. does it give the govt the power to do this?
2. This leads to the 2nd big picture. What is and is not constitutional is 100% arbitrary. It has to be determined by the courts or Congress.
3. Constitutions can be used to CREATE tyranny, to create a totalitarian state. Don't like your state becoming an Illegal magnet? Vote to stop free handouts to illegals? Too bad, courts overrule you (CA: Prop 187). Don't like gay marriage? Vote to stop homosexuals from culturally appropriating marriage? Too bad courts rule you (CA: Prop 8). You're living under a neo-liberal totalitarian state right now and it's being created though the courts interpreting constitutionalism. Your shield is being used as a sword against you.

It's clear you're a midwit who thinks he is soo smart because he is repeating the propaganda he learned in High School. Here is the truth, constitution or no constitution, there will always be a vision. That vision will be enforced by the state. If you like that vision, then you don't see any totalitarian control. This is why the neo-liberals and the social liberals don't view their actions as creating a totalitarian nation. In fact they view their actions as creating a more free society.

StraightShooter2 said:
Wrong, even as far back as the days of ancient Athens, age of consent tended to be around 16 for girls regardless of whether or not there was any codified age of consent:

In Athens, a girl generally got married at about 16 – typically to a man twice her age, often a paternal uncle or an associate of her father’s.​

There are also plenty of historical anodes about blood feuds or vendettas being started by a brother or father who believed his sister or daughter had been raped or taken sexually advantage of (the philosophy behind modern Common Law acknowledges the role which private retribution played in more primitive times or circumstances, and that modern systems of law and justice evolved out of this).


Not to mention in the 1800s, it was legal to cut your prepubescent son's balls off so that his voice wouldn't deepen and that he'd have a higher vocal range for singing opera - what's your point?

Castrato - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
1. US Age of Consent was 12 in most states before 1st wave feminism. It was also 12 in Great Britain and the Roman Empire.
2. Age of Marriage is not necessary the same as age of consent.
3. Does "generally" mean on avg? if so that means women could have gotten married younger. And 16 would still be wrongly considered "pedophilia" by the 18 yrs or older crowd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom