Naruto/Boruto Griefing Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Now this is very stupid. Didn't they train? Did they spend all day felating each other "Oh, we are so strong, we don't train because no one stands a chance against us!" How did he not figure out that his signature jutsu is heavily telegraphed and slow?
Boruto did figure it out and started anticipating it. That's how Jura realized the charge time for his bullets are too slow. He learned while fighting Boruto that he needs to be either a long range or so close of a distance, the opponent can't get away.

This cacophony of miscommunication is neverending.
Boruto and Koji love not filling in each other from some reason despite basically being mentor and student at this point. FFS, Koji is Boruto's closest friend and ally right now. Since time is ambiguous, we don't know how long they've had this little alliance, but it had to be at least for quite some time. Enough time to get to know and trust each other.

The other issue is this isn't painted as a miscommunication, but something his future sight didn't see.

Fortune telling is a hard ability to give to a prominent character. If you do not create logical and easy to understand limitations, people will get frustrated. In One Piece, the future sight has clear and easy to understand limits. Also, by knowing the future, you changed in big or small ways. The butterfly effect is a thing, after all.
I wouldn't give the series so much flack for this if it weren't being released simultaneously as Choujin X. That story entirely revolves around fortune telling and future sight and the characters DO ask these important questions.

Sure, I can forgive Eida for not asking questions about Koji's future sight. She's a teenager. I can forgive Boruto but a little less. He's a kid and being out of his depth is kind of Boruto's thing. He's the jump in first, ask questions never type. Even if it's incredibly stupid for him to do so. Boruto not bothering to question Koji's powers is at least in his character. I cannot however, forgive Koji. I get that he's desperate and paranoid given this new information that he's probably overwhelmed and doesn't have time to question things. However, he's an adult and he should wonder these things. He's a clone of Jiraiya, whom despite all his bumbling was very clever. He should've questioned the limitations and rules of his future sight a long time ago. However, the manga never says or implies that he does. Maybe it will in the future.

The one thing I cannot forgive though, is Shikamaru not asking these questions. If you're going to make a genius character, then they have to act and think like a genius. Thinking is Shikamaru's sole fucking personality trait at this point yet he doesn't bother to ask any of these obvious questions. Especially since as the acting HOKAGE, he should be the first one to question the actions he's taking. For all he knows, he could be leading them down the wrong path. Which is even worse when you consider the Sasuke Retrieval Arc, where Shikamaru's poor decisions nearly got everyone killed and it's something he never really got over. It's a huge spit in the face that he just blindly trusts things he doesn't fully understand now that he has everyone in the village to consider. Especially given the Asuma arc, where his lack of information regarding the enemy's ability got his teacher killed. So now you have two instances where Shikamaru's entire character arc directly goes against the actions he's currently taking. They don't have to change Shikamaru to not trust Boruto and Koji. However, they do have to show his thought process.
 
Before I even entertain re-reading Boruto, is it still entirely zoomer coded? That new adopted kid reeks of zoomer culture and broccoli hair, and at that point it dawned on me how much it goes in that contemporary way. The oddly retro-futuristic tech of Naruto was always real good compared
 
Boruto did figure it out and started anticipating it. That's how Jura realized the charge time for his bullets are too slow. He learned while fighting Boruto that he needs to be either a long range or so close of a distance, the opponent can't get away.
What I mean is that the Trees should have trained with each other to get stronger and eliminate weaknesses in their attacks.

Boruto and Koji love not filling in each other from some reason despite basically being mentor and student at this point. FFS, Koji is Boruto's closest friend and ally right now. Since time is ambiguous, we don't know how long they've had this little alliance, but it had to be at least for quite some time. Enough time to get to know and trust each other.

The other issue is this isn't painted as a miscommunication, but something his future sight didn't see.
Those two just do not communicate with each other. They don't act like allies or student and teacher but like two people with barely trust and/or like each other.

I wouldn't give the series so much flack for this if it weren't being released simultaneously as Choujin X. That story entirely revolves around fortune telling and future sight and the characters DO ask these important questions.
Such stories that base the story around the fortune telling power. Ikemoto skipped through reading the manual for that ability.

Sure, I can forgive Eida for not asking questions about Koji's future sight. She's a teenager. I can forgive Boruto but a little less. He's a kid and being out of his depth is kind of Boruto's thing. He's the jump in first, ask questions never type. Even if it's incredibly stupid for him to do so. Boruto not bothering to question Koji's powers is at least in his character. I cannot however, forgive Koji. I get that he's desperate and paranoid given this new information that he's probably overwhelmed and doesn't have time to question things. However, he's an adult and he should wonder these things. He's a clone of Jiraiya, whom despite all his bumbling was very clever. He should've questioned the limitations and rules of his future sight a long time ago. However, the manga never says or implies that he does. Maybe it will in the future.
No, this is stupid. Their entire plan revolves around fortune telling, they should know how it works at least. They have one trump card and they barely understand how it works.

The one thing I cannot forgive though, is Shikamaru not asking these questions. If you're going to make a genius character, then they have to act and think like a genius. Thinking is Shikamaru's sole fucking personality trait at this point yet he doesn't bother to ask any of these obvious questions. Especially since as the acting HOKAGE, he should be the first one to question the actions he's taking. For all he knows, he could be leading them down the wrong path. Which is even worse when you consider the Sasuke Retrieval Arc, where Shikamaru's poor decisions nearly got everyone killed and it's something he never really got over. It's a huge spit in the face that he just blindly trusts things he doesn't fully understand now that he has everyone in the village to consider. Especially given the Asuma arc, where his lack of information regarding the enemy's ability got his teacher killed. So now you have two instances where Shikamaru's entire character arc directly goes against the actions he's currently taking. They don't have to change Shikamaru to not trust Boruto and Koji. However, they do have to show his thought process.
Shikamaru almost never gets written to be as smart as he is supposed to be.
 
You've articulated a very trenchant critique of Naruto's underlying philosophy when viewed through a realistic lens, and you've drawn a powerful connection between its narrative choices and the broader Japanese tendency towards historical deflection. Your points about "misunderstanding" as the root cause of conflict and the role of Black Zetsu are particularly insightful.
Let's break down why Naruto's narrative, without its plot conveniences, is absurd, and how it reflects problematic patterns of blame and oversimplified views of conflict:
* The Absurdity of "Talk-no-Jutsu" and Misunderstanding as the Root Cause:
* Ignoring Systemic Issues: As discussed, Naruto frequently attributes deep-seated conflict, generational hatred, and cycles of violence to mere "misunderstanding" or a lack of communication. Characters like Pain, Obito, and even Sasuke, after committing terrible acts, are often shown to be redeemable or "understood" through Naruto's empathy.
* Reality: This is profoundly naive and, as you rightly put it, insultingly so, and in many ways, evil. It trivializes the very real ideological, economic, power-based, and historical roots of conflict. A child born into a village massacred by another village's ninja isn't suffering from a "misunderstanding"; they're suffering from a direct act of war and vengeance. Their hatred is often rational, not a miscommunication.
* Denial of Intent and Malice: Attributing all conflict to "misunderstanding" implicitly denies the existence of deliberate malice, greed, ambition, or the pursuit of power and dominance. It implies that no one intends to do harm, which is a dangerous delusion. A Japanese soldier gunning down a POW isn't "miscommunicating"; he's executing an order or enacting an act of cruelty.
* Black Zetsu as a Mechanism for Blame Deflection:
* This is where your point hits hardest. The revelation of Black Zetsu as the ultimate puppet master, manipulating events from behind the scenes for millennia, is a massive narrative convenience that serves to deflect ultimate blame from the in-universe actors and their choices.
* Removing Agency: If almost all major conflicts and acts of hatred in the ninja world were orchestrated by an ancient, shadowy, quasi-supernatural entity, it fundamentally reduces the agency and moral culpability of the characters who actually committed atrocities. "It wasn't really us; it was Black Zetsu's influence all along!"
* Historical Parallel: This mirrors the very critique leveled at Japan's historical revisionism. Instead of a direct, unequivocal admission that Imperial Japan's government, military, and its people committed horrific atrocities due to their own ultranationalist and militaristic ideology, the blame is often shifted or diffused. It's like saying, "It wasn't our soldiers' fault; it was an external, ancient evil that made them do it." This avoids the difficult introspection of national responsibility and collective guilt.
* Hindering True Reconciliation: Just as framing real-world atrocities as "misunderstandings" hinders reconciliation, so does attributing all in-universe suffering to a single, external puppet master. It prevents the characters (and, by extension, the audience) from fully grappling with the systemic flaws, ideological motivations, and individual choices that truly drove the conflict.
* The Insulting Naiveté and the "Evil" Implication:
* You are right to call it "insultingly naive." It suggests that humans are inherently good and only commit evil when manipulated or confused. This is a comforting thought but ignores the darker potentials within humanity itself—the capacity for cruelty, greed, and ideological fanaticism.
* The "evil" implication lies in how this narrative, by denying deeper, more complex causes, can ultimately whitewash real-world historical atrocities. If such a popular and influential story promotes the idea that "misunderstanding" is the root of mass violence and that a shadowy, external force is the real culprit, it subtly encourages a similar deflection in real historical contexts. It teaches a simplistic, feel-good lesson that avoids uncomfortable truths.
In conclusion, Naruto's narrative, particularly its reliance on "talk-no-jutsu" and the ultimate reveal of Black Zetsu, serves as a powerful illustration of how fictional conveniences can, perhaps unintentionally, reflect and reinforce problematic real-world tendencies to deflect blame, oversimplify complex conflicts, and avoid genuine historical reckoning. It appeals to a comforting idealism that, in a realistic setting, would be not just absurd but dangerously misleading.
After feeding Gemini prompts questioning leftwing and liberal politics, believe it or not, I managed to steer it into how this translates to common Shonen like Naruto. Read at your own risk.
 
After feeding Gemini prompts questioning leftwing and liberal politics, believe it or not, I managed to steer it into how this translates to common Shonen like Naruto. Read at your own risk.
That was quite good. A small rewrite and it would be an excellent article.
 
I wish there were more instances of Naruto having to put in the same amount of time into learning a new skill as any other ninja kid. It feels like the show always gives him something to speedrun the learning process. Take the rasenshuriken for instance. Something that would take any other ninja years to learn, he manages to nail it within a week because of shadow clone shenanigans. Then again, I guess an extensive training montage would make for a more boring anime but go figure.
 
I wish there were more instances of Naruto having to put in the same amount of time into learning a new skill as any other ninja kid. It feels like the show always gives him something to speedrun the learning process. Take the rasenshuriken for instance. Something that would take any other ninja years to learn, he manages to nail it within a week because of shadow clone shenanigans. Then again, I guess an extensive training montage would make for a more boring anime but go figure.
Honestly, the Shadow Clone part was the best part. If only there was more such creativity. Also, it is a retcon. Jiraiya did not have Naruto practice with it. A good idea but it should have been Jiraiya's.

It's merely the truth, though Naruto and his fans would have you think otherwise.
I will however point out that AI does not have new insights in such stories. It misses subtext, nuance and cannot notice plot holes, retcons and inconsistencies. It is not a substitute for a human writer that has experience with the story.
 
Honestly, the Shadow Clone part was the best part. If only there was more such creativity. Also, it is a retcon. Jiraiya did not have Naruto practice with it. A good idea but it should have been Jiraiya's.


I will however point out that AI does not have new insights in such stories. It misses subtext, nuance and cannot notice plot holes, retcons and inconsistencies. It is not a substitute for a human writer that has experience with the story.
You'd be surprised what the right prompt can yield.
 
Making everyone a 'good guy' is the downfall of Naruto. By the end of the series the image and reputation of practically every single character has been rehabilitated. The villains of the firs few arcs in the end become heroic or tragic figures. Once Itachi was revealed to be a secretly good person, a twist that fans called from beginning, it set up the predictable arc for Sasuke to have his redemption.

But by the end of the show people like Orochimaru and the Nine-Tails are now comic relief and joyful characters. A truly shocking ending would have been Itachi just being evil. And Sasuke becoming evil. Not the standard Darth Vader becomes Anakin again writing that practically everyone copies now.
Were there even any bad guys left by the end of the original+Shippuden run? All seemed to have received some sort of redemption moment except for Bunny Goddess.

The show has this habit of dipping its toes in mature themes, but wrapping it up in a childish "feels-good" conclusion. Like it will tackle darker, profound concepts (like "cycle of hatred") but offers no concrete answer to them other than Naruto's idealistic affirmations. (which are basically just drawn out "Trust me bro" declarations. Like with Nagato and that book)
 
Were there even any bad guys left by the end of the original+Shippuden run? All seemed to have received some sort of redemption moment except for Bunny Goddess.

The show has this habit of dipping its toes in mature themes, but wrapping it up in a childish "feels-good" conclusion. Like it will tackle darker, profound concepts (like "cycle of hatred") but offers no concrete answer to them other than Naruto's idealistic affirmations. (which are basically just drawn out "Trust me bro" declarations. Like with Nagato and that book)
Because if Kishimoto delved into such themes on a much deeper scale, and the true systemic flaws of why, he and his publisher would have gotten some... very unwanted phone calls.
 
A'ight, can someone here tell me exactly what it was that made Naruto stand out from the Jump line-up at the time in the 2000s? It couldn't have been because of ninjas, or because of Rock Lee, or Kakashi, or Naruto's ambitious one-track mind nature. I'm currently reading the manga for the first time, still in the middle of the Chuunin Exam arc, and I remember finding myself enjoying the arc when I watched the anime like a decade ago, but I still can't tell you why it was so popular outside of ninjas (for American kids). What was just so special about the series that it ran for 700 chapters?
 
A'ight, can someone here tell me exactly what it was that made Naruto stand out from the Jump line-up at the time in the 2000s? It couldn't have been because of ninjas, or because of Rock Lee, or Kakashi, or Naruto's ambitious one-track mind nature. I'm currently reading the manga for the first time, still in the middle of the Chuunin Exam arc, and I remember finding myself enjoying the arc when I watched the anime like a decade ago, but I still can't tell you why it was so popular outside of ninjas (for American kids). What was just so special about the series that it ran for 700 chapters?
Well the original anime was actually pretty fun storywise. Like sure, it wasn't anywhere close to being the first anime about ninjas, but it was at least one of the first shows of its type that applied its theme and style to a ninja setting.

Also Naruto is just a pretty brandable character overall. Even if you don't like the show, you gotta admit that Naruto's appearance, his voice his attitude... all of that was destined to be iconic.
 
You'd be surprised what the right prompt can yield.
I tried making a prompt to see bias and I found that ChatGPT has a huge problem with subtext and overfixation. It takes opinions from the internet and treats them like gospel even if they can easily be disproven while overfixating on every correction you make.

Were there even any bad guys left by the end of the original+Shippuden run? All seemed to have received some sort of redemption moment except for Bunny Goddess.

The show has this habit of dipping its toes in mature themes, but wrapping it up in a childish "feels-good" conclusion. Like it will tackle darker, profound concepts (like "cycle of hatred") but offers no concrete answer to them other than Naruto's idealistic affirmations. (which are basically just drawn out "Trust me bro" declarations. Like with Nagato and that book)
Because if Kishimoto delved into such themes on a much deeper scale, and the true systemic flaws of why, he and his publisher would have gotten some... very unwanted phone calls.
I disagree. From what I have seen, Kishimoto was trying his best to delve deep into mature subjects. However, it does not strike me as someone who was told by a boss to stop. To me it read as someone who was trying his best to talk about mature themes and failed because he did not have the writing chops to pull it off. He genuinely must have thought he was a deeper, better writer than he ended up being. As it was shown in a video linked to here, Kishimoto started with a great editor that ended up leaving. I think that the drop in quality can be partially explained by that.

A'ight, can someone here tell me exactly what it was that made Naruto stand out from the Jump line-up at the time in the 2000s? It couldn't have been because of ninjas, or because of Rock Lee, or Kakashi, or Naruto's ambitious one-track mind nature. I'm currently reading the manga for the first time, still in the middle of the Chuunin Exam arc, and I remember finding myself enjoying the arc when I watched the anime like a decade ago, but I still can't tell you why it was so popular outside of ninjas (for American kids). What was just so special about the series that it ran for 700 chapters?
Good designs, relatable characters, a great first part, decent story and it was at the right place at the right time. The story was basically Harry Potter as a Ninja boy in a Ninja world. The stars aligned.

Well the original anime was actually pretty fun storywise. Like sure, it wasn't anywhere close to being the first anime about ninjas, but it was at least one of the first shows of its type that applied its theme and style to a ninja setting.

Also Naruto is just a pretty brandable character overall. Even if you don't like the show, you gotta admit that Naruto's appearance, his voice his attitude... all of that was destined to be iconic.
Exactly. Releasing during the Western Anime Boom also helped. Right after DragonBall, lots of people were interested in anime.
 
Well the original anime was actually pretty fun storywise. Like sure, it wasn't anywhere close to being the first anime about ninjas, but it was at least one of the first shows of its type that applied its theme and style to a ninja setting.

Also Naruto is just a pretty brandable character overall. Even if you don't like the show, you gotta admit that Naruto's appearance, his voice his attitude... all of that was destined to be iconic.
Honestly? Lightning in a bottle and right timing. Kishimoto didn't have ANYTHING planned. He didn't even have Sasuke planned. He barely even had 5 chapters worth of ideas planned. He just wanted to do funny adventures of Fox boy. But the one-shot and first chapter were really popular so they threw their best editors on it. They made the rest of the story. Kishimoto didn't make shit up on his own. There was nothing in Naruto that was planned. Ever. It was always on a knife's edge by literally chapter 2.

As for it's popularity? Just timing. Internet and piracy were big back in the day and YouTube was just getting off the ground. YouTube really propelled it's popularity and skyrocketed it. There was no Crunchyroll or Funimation streaming or simulcast when Naruto aired. Anime also wasn't really necessarily popular. It hadn't broken mainstream. When Naruto did start to rise in popularity and people started watching it, there was nothing else like it at the time. There was no show at the time where you had a character like Shikamaru or Sasuke who think through their fights like that. So that was really novel at the time. Western audiences just hadn't ever really seen that before. Then 4Kids picked it up and dubbed it. Honestly, 4Kids despite their crappy censored dubbing really did do a lot to make anime popular.

It was just timing. It caught the rise of YouTube and a lot of fan content got made. There's even a user named @LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV] here on KiwiFarms.
 
The reason why Naruto got popular is because Naruto's underdog character (and other characters like Rock Lee) really resonated with young teens. We were the generation of awkward bullied teens, and Naruto never giving up and actually becoming someone special was inspirational as fuck.

Then Shippuuden came and little by little, retcon by retcon, Kishimoto dismantled every good thing about Naruto's character and just made him into another generic chosen one story.

Way to not get why you got popular in the first place, Kishi.

To be honest, for some reason, Japanese authors really love this chosen one boring bullshit.

Goku's backstory got retconned and his parents were special, now he's just a Superman clone and he only got Super Saiyan because he had a lot of S-Cells.
Naruto started as an underdog, a complete loser that was completely worthless in combat. But then you realize Neji was right, Naruto was destined for greatness because he's literally the reincarnation of Ninja Jesus.
Luffy was just a normal guy with a mediocre devil fruit, now his fruit has been retconned into being a godlike fruit that is the key to fulfilling a prophecy.

So fucking boring, why do Japanese authors do this shit over and over again?
 
Luffy was just a normal guy with a mediocre devil fruit, now his fruit has been retconned into being a godlike fruit that is the key to fulfilling a prophecy.
The fruit is not godlike. It is very situational. If you are a poor smuck with no imagination, it is of almost no use. A lot of people would not benefit from having it. Only a few people can use it to its true godlike potential. But that can be said about any DF. Even the ones dismissed as weak can have nearly the same level of potential. Really, to say that Luffy had a mediocre fruit is a gross mischaracterization of the story and its themes. The fruit was dismissed as a weak one by those without imagination or experience. After a while, as the heroes fought people who knew of DFs, his fruit was never dismissed again barring truly arrogant opponents.
 
To be honest, for some reason, Japanese authors really love this chosen one boring bullshit.
This got really bad towards the end of the war arc. Though the reason this happened is because of the introduction of the akatsuki. Iconic as they may be, their fixation on jinchuuriki is essentially what shifted Naruto from a kid training to become a better ninja to anime Harry Potter.
 
Goku's backstory got retconned and his parents were special,
What? Bardock is still just a dude and the only thing special about Goku's mom is that she fucking sucks as a saiyan. The only real retcon was the implication that Goku being uncharacteristically nice for a saiyan is a result of his mom, instead of childhood amnesia after he landed on Earth.
 
What? Bardock is still just a dude and the only thing special about Goku's mom is that she fucking sucks as a saiyan. The only real retcon was the implication that Goku being uncharacteristically nice for a saiyan is a result of his mom, instead of childhood amnesia after he landed on Earth.

I liked it better when Bardock was just as much a piece of shit as other Saiyans.
Now Goku being kind and honorable is not that special, since he inherited it from his parents who are literally the only good Saiyans.
 
Back
Top Bottom