US Musk Twitter Leak Raises Concern About Outside Data Access - They're going to end up killing Elon before this is all over with

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Musk Twitter Leak Raises Concern About Outside Data Access
Bloomberg (archive.vn)
By Kurt Wagner
2022-12-09 06:41:30GMT

Elon Musk is giving outside writers unprecedented access to internal Twitter Inc. information, instructing the current head of trust and safety to provide screenshots of users’ accounts.

Screenshots showing internal systems restricted to a relatively small number of people in charge of moderating content were shared by journalist Bari Weiss on Thursday. The images carry a watermark — a translucent label — indicating they were taken from the employee view of Twitter’s trust and safety head, Ella Irwin.

The watermarked screenshots, taken since December 7, 2022, raised concerns about whether Weiss had access to Irwin’s internal account, which would also mean access to sensitive information like a user’s private messages, according to people with knowledge of Twitter’s systems.

Irwin later clarified that she took the screenshots herself to prevent such a scenario. “For security purposes, the screenshots requested came from me so we could ensure no PII,” or personally identifiable information, “was exposed,” Irwin said on Twitter. “We did not give this access to reporters and no, reporters were not accessing user DMs,” or direct messages.

The watermarks were added to employee accounts after Twitter was hacked in 2020, the people said, a move intended to make it easier for Twitter to know where screenshots of internal systems were coming from.

Weiss didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The screenshots were shared as part of the “Twitter Files,” a collection of internal documents and emails from former Twitter employees that Musk handed over to outside reporters who are now publishing them.

Musk said earlier this month that Weiss and another writer, Matt Taibbi, have unfettered access to the Twitter Files. People with knowledge of Twitter’s systems are concerned that such broad access could leave Twitter in violation of its 2022 privacy agreement with the Federal Trade Commission.

“Feels like Weiss’ thread should be enough for the FTC to open an investigation into a violation of the consent decree and perhaps get a subpoena for Twitter’s internal access logs,” tweeted Alex Stamos, who formerly ran security at Meta Platforms Inc. and is now at the Stanford Internet Observatory.

Part of Twitter’s FTC agreement stipulates that employee access to sensitive user account data is only granted to people with a valid business justification for accessing said data. The executives who would have approved that access, or would have investigated its misuse, have left the company.

“The authors have broad and expanding access to Twitter’s files,” Weiss tweeted Thursday. “The only condition we agreed to was that the material would first be published on Twitter.”
 
I wonder how many high-level government people were DM'ing back and forth classified material. I'm going to guess a ton.

I am always shocked when people think that their 'private messages' on social media aren't read by every admin that wants to, much less all the keyword bots. People that should really know better too.
 
Last edited:
Is it a leak if it's authorized by the owner of the company?

If these systems are only accessible to a small number of people, why panic so much when all the jannies were locked out? It only takes a handful to really keep the operation going.

Why be worried that admin accounts can read DMs now, but not be worried about it before?

What do the watermarks look like and how do they work? Can they be faked with Inspect Element?
 
Screenshots showing internal systems restricted to a relatively small number of people in charge of moderating content were shared by journalist Bari Weiss on Thursday. The images carry a watermark — a translucent label — indicating they were taken from the employee view of Twitter’s trust and safety head, Ella Irwin.

The watermarked screenshots, taken since December 7, 2022, raised concerns about whether Weiss had access to Irwin’s internal account, which would also mean access to sensitive information like a user’s private messages, according to people with knowledge of Twitter’s systems.

Irwin later clarified that she took the screenshots herself to prevent such a scenario. “For security purposes, the screenshots requested came from me so we could ensure no PII,” or personally identifiable information, “was exposed,” Irwin said on Twitter. “We did not give this access to reporters and no, reporters were not accessing user DMs,” or direct messages.

In other words, this is a big nothingburger. An employee with access to internal Twitter data accessed and released some of that data at the request of the CEO and sole owner of Twitter.

To the best of my knowledge, anything you post to your company's network on company time while working for your company belongs to your company and can be used as the company sees fit.
 
This is a talking point that's currently being spread on Mastodon by certain known far-left accounts that are known to have deliberately infiltrated conservative spaces:

BardfinnNeverHaveAShitAboutPrivacy.jpg

Bardfinn, a notorious Reddit censor - who is long suspected of implementing at Reddit what has now been exposed to be actually the case Twatter - has been purging his Twatter DMs, openly stating he's doing this because he fears Bari Weiss, Greenwald & Co gaining access to his account to expose nepotism and Twatter and other platforms:

BardfinnBariWeissIHaveToTry.jpg
source: https://archive.vn/963u5#selection-587.0-591.157

He apparently doesn't know that "deleting" a DM at Twatter merely makes it invisible to the account itself, with Twatter themselves still having access to it.

Bardfinn admitted he has been losing sleep over #Twitterfiles because he fears that his DMs will reveal the nepotism at Reddit besides Twitter:

BardfinnLosingSleepOverTwitterfilesLMAO.jpg

That's why they're doing this "we didn't consent to this! this is a privacy violation!" song and dance right now. They never gave a fuck about privacy. Bardfinn openly admitted he used sockpuppet accounts to infiltrate conservative spaces and feminists spaces on Reddit to target them. Talia Lavin literally wrote a book instructing far leftists who to violate other people's privacy by infiltrating conservative spaces under false pretenses. She never gave a fuck about whose privacy was being violated when she was infiltrating those spaces herself.
 

Attachments

  • BardfinnLosingSleepOverTwitterfilesLMAO.jpg
    BardfinnLosingSleepOverTwitterfilesLMAO.jpg
    158.3 KB · Views: 5
Bardfinn admitted he has been losing sleep over #Twitterfiles because he fears that his DMs will reveal the nepotism at Reddit besides Twitter:
Good God the only thing dumber than thinking your Twitter DMs are private and deleting them will help is to go on another social media platform and openly announce that you're doing it. This person is too stupid to live. You can imagine the depravity that must be in those DMs.
 
Part of Twitter’s FTC agreement stipulates that employee access to sensitive user account data is only granted to people with a valid business justification for accessing said data.
I dunno it feels like one could make a compelling argument for a transparent investigation being necessary after all of the admitted fuckery in the acquisition. Even that notwithstanding "the board/ownership demands this" is generally a very valid reason to do something.
 
God I hope he doesn't make public officials "private messages" public information despite the fact that they're on the public payroll and shouldn't be able to obscure their use of a public platform as representatives of us as constituents.
 
Back
Top Bottom