US Murthy: gun owners are a disease - Spoiler: the Surgeon General didn't directly say that.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Authored by Mike McDaniel via American Thinker,

Until 1996, one of the primary tactics of anti-liberty/gun cracktivists was to treat criminal misuse of guns, as well as accidents and suicides as public health matters. There was, of course, no disease vector, no virus, bacteria or parasite. There could be no vaccine, no medication, no treatment. None of that was the point. If they couldn’t disarm law-abiding Americans any other way, they’d try to do it under the “public health” banner.

Fortunately for free Americans, in 1996 this language was inserted into a budget bill:

"None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control."
That simple sentence, that law, drove supposed medical scientists obsessed with gun control underground. They still did anti-gun advocacy and “research” with public funds, they were just quiet about it, funneling money and “research” through NGOs and anti-gun groups.

Take the link to see an NPR article about how, for more than a quarter century, they’ve done all they can to circumvent the law. And now, the Surgeon General, in what may be the dying days of the Mummified Meat Puppet Administration, is saying the quiet part out loud. Dr. Vivek Murthy, on June 25, released a report titled “U.S. Surgeon General Issues Advisory on the Public Health Crisis of Firearm Violence in the United States.”

Today, United States Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy released a landmark Surgeon General’s Advisory on Firearm Violence, declaring firearm violence in America a public health crisis. Firearm violence is pervasive, with more than half (54 percent) of U.S. adults or their family members having experienced a firearm-related incident in their lives. Over the last decade, the number of people who have died from firearm-related injuries, including suicides, homicides, and accidental deaths, has been rising, and firearm violence is now the leading cause of death among children and adolescents.

That 54% figure was derived from a telephone poll of 1271 English speakers and 73 Spanish speakers. Those doing the polling claim it is a “nationally representative sample,” but they publish nothing on the geographical distribution of the poll. Obviously, any poll that focused on blue state urban areas would produce different results than more broadly based polling. Oddly, the document is labeled “KFF Health Tracking Poll/ KFF Covid-19 Vaccine Monitor.” What that might have to do with gun issues is anyone’s guess.

The assertion “firearm violence is now the leading cause of death among children and adolescents” is likewise misleading. This is an old trick of anti-liberty/gun cracktivists. That assertion is only potentially accurate if one includes people 18+, suicides, accidents and gangs shooting each other. One would think, considering how the federal public health bureaucracy threw away its credibility over fraudulent Covid huckstering, they’d go overboard to be accurate and truthful, but they’ve obviously learned nothing.

Murthy’s report notes the “Black community endured the highest firearm homicide rates in every age group,” but doesn’t mention this is because Black criminals commit all manner of violent crimes in numbers far outstripping their numbers in the population. Nor does Murthy mention Democrats have done all they can to help those criminals, releasing them without bail, refusing to prosecute, decriminalizing crime in general, and in the rare cases where violent felons are prosecuted, imposing ridiculously light sentences.

As one might imagine, Murthy’s recommendations conform exactly to Joe Biden’s handler’s anti-liberty, unconstitutional, demands:

3. Firearm risk reduction strategies, such as:
a. Requiring safe and secure firearm storage, including child access prevention laws;
b. Implementing universal background checks and expanding purchaser licensing laws;
c. Banning assault weapons and large capacity magazines for civilian use;
d. Treating firearms like other consumer products, including requiring safety testing or safety features;
e. Implementing effective firearm removal policies when individuals are a danger to themselves or others; and
f. Creating safer conditions in public places related to firearm use and carry.
Every one of these anti-gun wish list fever dreams would violate the Bruen decision. For example “d” is an attempt to violate The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. And “f” is a stealth for establishing “gun free” zones that would encompass entire cities, even entire states. All are an attempt to directly infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans. Criminals—surprise!—don’t obey gun laws.

It should be no surprise the Surgeon General of a lawless administration should himself violate federal law. It reminds us of this quote attributed to Thomas Jefferson: “eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.”

We thought we had to keep a close eye on the health establishment over Covid and actual diseases. Now we have to keep an eye on them as they try to treat an unalienable, fundament right as a disease, and Americans exercising it, as a disease vector to be eradicated.

Mike McDaniel is a USAF veteran, classically trained musician, Japanese and European fencer, life-long athlete, firearm instructor, retired police officer and high school and college English teacher. He is a published author and blogger. His home blog is Stately McDaniel Manor.
 
One would think, considering how the federal public health bureaucracy threw away its credibility over fraudulent Covid huckstering, they’d go overboard to be accurate and truthful, but they’ve obviously learned nothing.
And they will learn nothing till they are fired, and stripped of their benefits. Punishment as to hurt.
 
For people not reading the article, the author is shitting on the statement made by the US Surgeon General.
Every one of these anti-gun wish list fever dreams would violate the Bruen decision. For example “d” is an attempt to violate The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. And “f” is a stealth for establishing “gun free” zones that would encompass entire cities, even entire states. All are an attempt to directly infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans.
I hate to break it to the author but like... Getting to violate the Constitution and the rights of American citizens is just fucking icing on the cake for these anti-gun types.
 
You think you hate leftoids, shitlibs, commies and anti-gun trannies enough. You think you do, but you don't.
 
Take the link to see an NPR article about how, for more than a quarter century, they’ve done all they can to circumvent the law. And now, the Surgeon General, in what may be the dying days of the Mummified Meat Puppet Administration, is saying the quiet part out loud. Dr. Vivek Murthy, on June 25, released a report titled “U.S. Surgeon General Issues Advisory on the Public Health Crisis of Firearm Violence in the United States.”
Shit like this is why I'm happy Chevron Deference is dead. Somehow OSHA had the right to step in and not only mandate vaccines, but force landlords to waive rent, while forcing them to maintain their properties, with no promise of compensation. Now imagine if some fucking "Doctor" decided guns are so dangerous, the Right to Bear Arms needs to be suspended until the gun violence epidemic is over.
 
This is the poo's statement on why Gun violence is a health epidemic. He looks like N&A Productions.


Hello, I'm U.S. Surgeon General, Doctor Vivek Murthy. Today, for the first time in the history of our office, I am issuing a Surgeon General's Advisory on firearm violence. It outlines the urgent threat firearm violence poses to the health and well-being of our country.

As a doctor, I've seen the consequences of firearm violence up close and the lives of the patients that cared for over the years. These are moms and dads, sons and daughters, all of whom were robbed of their physical and mental health by senseless acts of violence.

Unfortunately, the problem has continued to grow. Fifty-four percent of adults in America report that they or family member have experienced a firearm related incident, whether they've been personally threatened with or injured by a firearm, lost a family member, witnessed a shooting, or shot a firearm in self-defense.

Many of these harms are disproportionately felt in our communities. Black individuals endure the highest rates of firearm homicides, while suicide rates are highest among Veterans, older white individuals, and younger American Indian or Alaska Native people.

What is especially devastating is how this has affected our children. Firearm violence has become the number one cause of death among children and adolescents, more than car accidents or drug overdoses.

I've sat with parents who've lost their child to firearm violence. I've listened to their stories and felt their pain as they describe the holes in their hearts. As a father, I know a parent's worst nightmare is to lose a child, to feel like you can't protect your child from harm.

Beyond these precious lives that are lost to firearm violence, there are wider ripples of harm to those who are injured, who witnessed the incidents, who live in urban and rural communities where such violence takes place, and who constantly read and hear about firearm violence.

The collective trauma and fear that Americans are experiencing is contributing to the mental health challenges that we are facing today. Nearly 6 in 10 U.S. adults say they worry about a loved one being a victim of firearm violence.

Our children should not have to live in fear that they are going to get shot if they go to school. None of us should have to worry that going to the mall or concert, or house of worship means putting our lives at risk, or that we'll get a call that a loved one in a moment of crisis has taken their own life with a firearm.

All of us, regardless of our background or beliefs, want to live in a world that is safe for us and our children.

The Surgeon General's Advisory lays out the approach we can take to address firearm violence as the public health crisis that it is. This includes implementing community violence prevention programs and firearm risk reduction strategies, improving access to mental health care for those exposed to or at risk for firearm violence, and expanding research funding to inform and evaluate our prevention strategies.

Firearm violence is a public health crisis. Our failure to address it is a moral crisis. To protect the health and well-being of Americans, especially our children, we must now act with the clarity, courage and urgency that this moment demands.
 
Last edited:
I refuse to accept what this Dalit says as truth. He is an inferior being who handles shit. His spirit is full of shit. He is a dalit, cursed to revel in shit, speak shit, his very soul is shit. He is worth less then the dog shit I scrap off my shoe. He is not fit to speak. Dalits are less then human. There is no point in arguing with him, and his arguments are shit. Just like his soul and body.

Remind this Dalit that he is literally a shit scooper who mistakenly assumed he could come to a foreign land and hide his inferior caste. But pure eyes can see who he is. Excrement. He was born it, he will die in. Give him not the time of day. And when he dies, take a bag of your dogs shit, and spread it on his grave, so that his mortal body may revel in the purpose to which the Gods in heaven demanded he serve.
 
3. Firearm risk reduction strategies, such as:
a. Requiring safe and secure firearm storage, including child access prevention laws;
b. Implementing universal background checks and expanding purchaser licensing laws;
c. Banning assault weapons and large capacity magazines for civilian use;
d. Treating firearms like other consumer products, including requiring safety testing or safety features;
e. Implementing effective firearm removal policies when individuals are a danger to themselves or others; and
f. Creating safer conditions in public places related to firearm use and carry.

Oh boy, where do we start?

As the author said, these all violate Bruen at the least, but let's dig some more.

a. You don't need to create any safe storage laws, you just need to start prosecuting dumbass parents who leave loaded guns on their beds/kitchen tables that Junior then uses to shoot himself. But, since most of the instances of this happening occur with blacks? They'll NEVER prosecute for actual violations, but they'll prosecute YOU because even though your put your unloaded, trigger-locked, ammo-in-a-different-room gun in a locked safebox? Well, is it DRILL PROOF? No? NEGLEGENCE!!!!

b. There's that copy-paste claim again for "expanded background checks" when you already have to pass one to buy a gun..... and once again, it's never detailed how these will be any better than the ones we already have that are only supposed to check for criminal records and they STILL fail due to sloppily-kept databases. YOu just know the expansion will be into areas completely unrelated to anything about guns or your lack of criminal record.... like, problematic facebook posts or unacceptable levels of voting for Trump.

c. No sense in beating this dead horse argument.

d. As the author points out, this actually violates existing consumer based laws. Also, they already have safeties, anything beyond that is a user issue, not a product issue.

e. "Effective" removal. Not LEGAL removal. "Effective" Kiss my ass you miserable commie. BTW, Even before Bruen? New York State tried this with the ERPO loophole and lost. The courts pointed out it was illegal to subject a person to the loss of their 2A rights under penalty of being labeled a loon without even a hearing when you at least need a hearing with two doctors present to put a person in the actual loony bin. Red Flag laws were dubious before Bruen and Chevron, post? They're out of luck.

f. A sign that says "No Mass Shootings" will prevent them? You think a ban on public carry or designated gun free zones are all that's keeping a person who WANTS oh so bad to kill their fellow citizens at the first sign of disrespect from doing so? People who would do you harm in public with a gun will NOT be stopped by LAWS. Maybe you should put murderous career felons who've been caught breaking laws while armed behind bars instead of letting them out time and time and time again and calling it "restorative justice"?
 
Last edited:
They never say who exactly will come and take these guns away. Who are they going to send door to door to take guns away from the people? Is it going to be them? The police? The army? I'm curious. They might get the first few people to give up, but once the jig is up, and thanks to the internet it will be up pretty fucking quickly, that number is going to drop quickly and the number of bodies will increase as well.
 
So you think women who want to defend themselves from being raped/murdered are a disease?

1720407825397.png
oh right of course you think so
you're Indian
 
"Please sirs turn in your guns and ammo, you can totally trust the government! Wait, are you buying more guns? DO NOT REDEEM YOU DAMN BASTARDS! BITCH BASTARD!"
 
You know what causes the vast, vast majority of gun crime, gun deaths, etc.?

NIGGERS.

Seriously, if we just had Common Sense Nigger Control, gun violence and deaths would drop to levels even Europeans would be envious of.

#ItsYourSonsNotOurGuns
 
Back
Top Bottom